Sustaining Maintenance Labor for Healthy Open Source Software Projects through Human Infrastructure: A Maintainer Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06723v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 08:30:52 GMT
• Title: Sustaining Maintenance Labor for Healthy Open Source Software Projects through Human Infrastructure: A Maintainer Perspective
• Authors: Johan Linåker, Georg J. P. Link, Kevin Lumbard,
• Abstract summary: Open Source Software (OSS) fuels our global digital infrastructure but is commonly maintained by small groups of people. Our study aims to investigate how maintenance labor can be supported and secured to enable the creation and maintenance of sustainable OSS projects.
• Score: 0.5188841610098436
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: Open Source Software (OSS) fuels our global digital infrastructure but is commonly maintained by small groups of people whose time and labor represent a depletable resource. For the OSS projects to stay sustainable, i.e., viable and maintained over time without interruption or weakening, maintenance labor requires an underlying infrastructure to be supported and secured. Aims: Using the construct of human infrastructure, our study aims to investigate how maintenance labor can be supported and secured to enable the creation and maintenance of sustainable OSS projects, viewed from the maintainers' perspective. Method: In our exploration, we interviewed ten maintainers from nine well-adopted OSS projects. We coded the data in two steps using investigator-triangulation. Results: We constructed a framework of infrastructure design that provide insight for OSS projects in the design of their human infrastructure. The framework specifically highlight the importance of human factors, e.g., securing a work-life balance and proactively managing social pressure, toxicity, and diversity. We also note both differences and overlaps in how the infrastructure needs to support and secure maintenance labor from maintainers and the wider OSS community, respectively. Funding is specifically highlighted as an important enabler for both types of resources. Conclusions: The study contributes to the qualitative understanding of the importance, sensitivity, and risk for depletion of the maintenance labor required to build and maintain healthy OSS projects. Human infrastructure is pivotal in ensuring that maintenance labor is sustainable, and by extension the OSS projects on which we all depend.

Related papers

• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features [6.814841205623832]
  This paper investigates the perspectives of OSS maintainers on vulnerability management and platform security features. We find that supply chain mistrust and lack of automation for vulnerability management are the most challenging. barriers to adopting platform security features include a lack of awareness and the perception that they are not necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T00:15:03Z)
• WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
  Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence. WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z)
• The Responsible Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet: A Review of Tools & Resources [100.23208165760114]
  Foundation model development attracts a rapidly expanding body of contributors, scientists, and applications. To help shape responsible development practices, we introduce the Foundation Model Development Cheatsheet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:55:49Z)
• Service Level Agreements and Security SLA: A Comprehensive Survey [51.000851088730684]
  This survey paper identifies state of the art covering concepts, approaches, and open problems of SLA management. It contributes by carrying out a comprehensive review and covering the gap between the analyses proposed in existing surveys and the most recent literature on this topic. It proposes a novel classification criterium to organize the analysis based on SLA life cycle phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T12:33:41Z)
• Individual context-free online community health indicators fail to identify open source software sustainability [3.192308005611312]
  We monitored thirty-eight open source projects over the period of a year. None of the projects were abandoned during this period, and only one project entered a planned shutdown. Results were highly heterogeneous, showing little commonality across documentation, mean response times for issues and code contributions, and available funding/staffing resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T14:41:41Z)
• Nip it in the Bud: Moderation Strategies in Open Source Software Projects and the Role of Bots [17.02726827353919]
  This study examines the various structures and norms that support community moderation in open source software projects. We interviewed 14 practitioners to uncover existing moderation practices and ways that automation can provide assistance. Our main contributions include a characterization of moderated content in OSS projects, moderation techniques, as well as perceptions of and recommendations for improving the automation of moderation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T19:42:51Z)
• Towards a Critical Open-Source Software Database [0.0]
  CrOSSD project aims to build a database of OSS projects and measure their current project "health" status. quantitative metrics will be gathered through automated crawling of meta information such as the number of contributors, commits and lines of code. qualitative metrics will be gathered for selected "critical" projects through manual analysis and automated tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T10:43:21Z)
• GreenDB -- A Dataset and Benchmark for Extraction of Sustainability Information of Consumer Goods [58.31888171187044]
  We present GreenDB, a database that collects products from European online shops on a weekly basis. As proxy for the products' sustainability, it relies on sustainability labels, which are evaluated by experts. We present initial results demonstrating that ML models trained with our data can reliably predict the sustainability label of products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T19:59:42Z)
• On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models [256.61956234436553]
  We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T17:50:08Z)
• Knowledge Integration of Collaborative Product Design Using Cloud Computing Infrastructure [65.2157099438235]
  The main focus of this paper is the concept of ongoing research in providing the knowledge integration service for collaborative product design and development using cloud computing infrastructure. Proposed knowledge integration services support users by giving real-time access to knowledge resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T18:44:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.