Invisible Labor: The Backbone of Open Source Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13405v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:34:45 GMT
• Title: Invisible Labor: The Backbone of Open Source Software
• Abstract summary: Open source software (OSS) is software that is viewable, editable and shareable by anyone with internet access.<n>We interviewed OSS contributors and asked them about their invisible labor contributions, leadership departure, membership turnover and sustainability.<n>We found that invisible labor is responsible for good leadership, reducing contributor turnover, and creating legitimacy for the project as an organization.
• Score: 0.9374652839580183
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Invisible labor is an intrinsic part of the modern workplace, and includes labor that is undervalued or unrecognized such as creating collaborative atmospheres. Open source software (OSS) is software that is viewable, editable and shareable by anyone with internet access. Contributors are mostly volunteers, who participate for personal edification and because they believe in the spirit of OSS rather than for employment. Volunteerism often leads to high personnel turnover, poor maintenance and inconsistent project management. This in turn, leads to a difficulty with sustainability long term. We believe that the key to sustainable management is the invisible labor that occurs behind the scenes. It is unclear how OSS contributors think about the invisible labor they perform or how that affects OSS sustainability. We interviewed OSS contributors and asked them about their invisible labor contributions, leadership departure, membership turnover and sustainability. We found that invisible labor is responsible for good leadership, reducing contributor turnover, and creating legitimacy for the project as an organization.

Related papers

• Scaling Large Reasoning Models beyond Human Supervision: A Path toward Superintelligence [77.303673110294]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can substantially improve reasoning in mathematics and code.<n>But direct human supervision cannot keep pace with the scale and complexity of model-generated experience.<n>This paper studies how LRMs can continue to improve as human supervision gradually recedes from the learning loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T16:48:48Z)
• The Fabricated Front: Generative AI and the Opacity of Workplace Performance [0.0]
  We show that effort opacity is the systematic decoupling of observable output from human engagement.<n>We identify five opacity mechanisms through which workplace fronts are reorganized.<n>We show that professionals defend the identity mechanisms while freely producing opacity around the labor mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T22:52:13Z)
• Knowing When to Quit: Diagnosing and Training LLMs to Abort Futile Reasoning [109.33717747526583]
  Large language models generate computationally expensive yet semantically void reasoning on beyond-capability tasks.<n>We introduce textbfCaRL (textbfCapability-textbfaligned textbfReinforcement textbfL) to align behavior with capability boundaries.<n>Experiments demonstrate a substantial reduction in futile reasoning while preserving performance across task difficulties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T09:30:33Z)
• Skill Self-Play: Pushing the Frontier of LLM Capability with Co-Evolving Skills [53.15216425100295]
  We introduce Skill Self-Play (Skill-SP), a co-evolutionary framework comprising a proposer, a solver, and a skill controller.<n>The proposer generates challenging tasks conditioned on dynamically sampled skills; the solver explores candidate solutions to push its capability boundaries; and the skill controller collects execution feedback to update and expand the skill library.<n>This interactive co-evolution effectively bridges the gap between structured verification and open-ended exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T17:59:22Z)
• Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI [49.05972944310475]
  We show that when contracts cannot distinguish all relevant future contingencies, there is a strictly positive welfare loss that no realistic mechanism can eliminate.<n>We show that prosocial agents, who weigh others' welfare alongside their own, can close this gap and achieve outcomes that are socially superior and individually beneficial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T19:37:07Z)
• Impostor Phenomenon as Human Debt: A Challenge to the Future of Software Engineering [46.44607910934403]
  The Impostor Phenomenon (IP) impacts a significant portion of the Software Engineering workforce.<n>Similar to technical debt, Human Debt accumulates due to gaps in psychological safety and inclusive support within socio-technical ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T13:26:38Z)
• Perspectives, Needs and Challenges for Sustainable Software Engineering Teams: A FinServ Case Study [0.5097809301149341]
  This research focuses on a financial services company (FinServCo) that invited us to investigate perceptions of sustainability in their IT function.<n>We conducted an exploratory qualitative case study using interviews and a focus group with six higher management employees and 16 software engineers.<n>Our study found a clear divergence in how sustainability is perceived between organisational levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T21:21:02Z)
• Non Technical Debt in Agile Software Development [2.162858608768008]
  NODLA project is a collaboration between Karlstad University and four leading Swedish industrial partners.<n>We identified key drivers of NTD and their impacts.<n>By implementing these strategies, organizations can reduce NTD, reclaim agility, and unlock their teams full potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T13:00:45Z)
• Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games [87.5673042805229]
  How large language models balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment.<n>We adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from behavioral economics, allowing us to observe how different LLMs navigate social dilemmas.<n>Surprisingly, we find that reasoning LLMs, such as the o1 series, struggle significantly with cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:02:47Z)
• Effort-aware Fairness: Incorporating a Philosophy-informed, Human-centered Notion of Effort into Algorithmic Fairness Metrics [44.14690069232159]
  We propose a philosophy-informed approach to conceptualize and evaluate Effort-aware Fairness (EaF)<n>Our work may enable AI model auditors to uncover and potentially correct unfair decisions against individuals who have spent significant efforts to improve but are still stuck with systemic disadvantages outside their control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T21:07:13Z)
• "Ohhh, He's the Boss!": Unpacking Power Dynamics Among Developers, Designers, and End-Users in FLOSS Usability [15.427821536893108]
  We explore how power of different FLOSS stakeholders manifests and can be mediated during collaboration. We conducted eight design workshops with different combinations of key FLOSS stakeholders. Our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the power dynamics among FLOSS stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:52:03Z)
• Sustaining Maintenance Labor for Healthy Open Source Software Projects through Human Infrastructure: A Maintainer Perspective [0.5188841610098436]
  Open Source Software (OSS) fuels our global digital infrastructure but is commonly maintained by small groups of people. Our study aims to investigate how maintenance labor can be supported and secured to enable the creation and maintenance of sustainable OSS projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T08:30:52Z)
• Unleashing Excellence through Inclusion: Navigating the Engagement-Performance Paradox [0.0]
  People who feel that they do not belong (or their voice is not heard at work) commonly become disengaged, unproductive, and pessimistic. This paper contributes to the literature on quality and performance management by developing a conceptual model of inclusion that directly impacts performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-13T19:30:01Z)
• WorkArena++: Towards Compositional Planning and Reasoning-based Common Knowledge Work Tasks [85.95607119635102]
  Large language models (LLMs) can mimic human-like intelligence.<n>WorkArena++ is designed to evaluate the planning, problem-solving, logical/arithmetic reasoning, retrieval, and contextual understanding abilities of web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T07:15:49Z)
• GoEX: Perspectives and Designs Towards a Runtime for Autonomous LLM Applications [46.85306320942487]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving to actively engage with tools and performing actions on real-world applications and services. Today, humans verify the correctness and appropriateness of the LLM-generated outputs before putting them into real-world execution. This poses significant challenges as code comprehension is well known to be notoriously difficult. In this paper, we study how humans can efficiently collaborate with, delegate to, and supervise autonomous LLMs in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T11:17:33Z)
• Co-Supervised Learning: Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Hierarchical Mixture of Experts [81.37287967870589]
  We propose to harness a diverse set of specialized teachers, instead of a single generalist one, that collectively supervises the strong student. Our approach resembles the classical hierarchical mixture of experts, with two components tailored for co-supervision. We validate the proposed method through visual recognition tasks on the OpenAI weak-to-strong benchmark and additional multi-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:56:11Z)
• Invisible Labor in Open Source Software Ecosystems [0.0]
  Invisible labor is work that is either not fully visible or not appropriately compensated.<n>Our study shows that roughly half of open source software (OSS) work is invisible.<n>This could improve fairness in software development while providing greater transparency into work designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T20:52:56Z)
• Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration [116.09561564489799]
  Solo Performance Prompting transforms a single LLM into a cognitive synergist by engaging in multi-turn self-collaboration with multiple personas. A cognitive synergist is an intelligent agent that collaboratively combines multiple minds' strengths and knowledge to enhance problem-solving in complex tasks. Our in-depth analysis shows that assigning multiple fine-grained personas in LLMs improves problem-solving abilities compared to using a single or fixed number of personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:45:19Z)
• Rethinking People Analytics With Inverse Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
  We propose a new design approach for workforce analytics we refer to as inverse transparency by design. We find that architectural changes are made without inhibiting core functionality. We conclude that inverse transparency by design is a promising approach to realize accepted and responsible people analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T21:37:35Z)
• Can Workers Meaningfully Consent to Workplace Wellbeing Technologies? [65.15780777033109]
  This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies. We show how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless" consent as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability to withhold consent. To meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the policies and practices surrounding the technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:15:07Z)
• Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social Good [17.145094780239564]
  We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with OSS for Social Good contributors. We find that the majority of contributors demonstrate a distinction between OSS4SG and OSS. OSS4SG contributors evaluate the owners of the project significantly more than OSS contributors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T21:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.