LLM-Enhanced Static Analysis for Precise Identification of Vulnerable OSS Versions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07321v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:43:06 GMT
• Title: LLM-Enhanced Static Analysis for Precise Identification of Vulnerable OSS Versions
• Authors: Yiran Cheng, Lwin Khin Shar, Ting Zhang, Shouguo Yang, Chaopeng Dong, David Lo, Shichao Lv, Zhiqiang Shi, Limin Sun,
• Abstract summary: Open-source software (OSS) has experienced a surge in popularity, attributed to its collaborative development model and cost-effective nature. The adoption of specific software versions in development projects may introduce security risks when these versions bring along vulnerabilities. Current methods of identifying vulnerable versions typically analyze and trace the code involved in vulnerability patches using static analysis with pre-defined rules. This paper presents Vercation, an approach designed to identify vulnerable versions of OSS written in C/C++.
• Score: 12.706661324384319
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Open-source software (OSS) has experienced a surge in popularity, attributed to its collaborative development model and cost-effective nature. However, the adoption of specific software versions in development projects may introduce security risks when these versions bring along vulnerabilities. Current methods of identifying vulnerable versions typically analyze and trace the code involved in vulnerability patches using static analysis with pre-defined rules. They then use syntactic-level code clone detection to identify the vulnerable versions. These methods are hindered by imprecisions due to (1) the inclusion of vulnerability-irrelevant code in the analysis and (2) the inadequacy of syntactic-level code clone detection. This paper presents Vercation, an approach designed to identify vulnerable versions of OSS written in C/C++. Vercation combines program slicing with a Large Language Model (LLM) to identify vulnerability-relevant code from vulnerability patches. It then backtraces historical commits to gather previous modifications of identified vulnerability-relevant code. We propose semantic-level code clone detection to compare the differences between pre-modification and post-modification code, thereby locating the vulnerability-introducing commit (vic) and enabling to identify the vulnerable versions between the patch commit and the vic. We curate a dataset linking 74 OSS vulnerabilities and 1013 versions to evaluate Vercation. On this dataset, our approach achieves the F1 score of 92.4%, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods. More importantly, Vercation detected 134 incorrect vulnerable OSS versions in NVD reports.

Related papers

• SecCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [47.11178028457252]
  We develop SecCodePLT, a unified and comprehensive evaluation platform for code GenAIs' risks. For insecure code, we introduce a new methodology for data creation that combines experts with automatic generation. For cyberattack helpfulness, we construct samples to prompt a model to generate actual attacks, along with dynamic metrics in our environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z)
• M2CVD: Enhancing Vulnerability Semantic through Multi-Model Collaboration for Code Vulnerability Detection [52.4455893010468]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong capabilities in code comprehension, but fine-tuning costs and semantic alignment issues limit their project-specific optimization. Code models such CodeBERT are easy to fine-tune, but it is often difficult to learn vulnerability semantics from complex code languages. This paper introduces the Multi-Model Collaborative Vulnerability Detection approach (M2CVD) to improve the detection accuracy of code models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T00:05:49Z)
• Predicting Likely-Vulnerable Code Changes: Machine Learning-based Vulnerability Protections for Android Open Source Project [0.0]
  This paper presents a framework that selectively triggers security reviews for incoming source code changes. The framework can automatically request additional security reviews at pre-submit time before the code changes are submitted to a source code repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T18:17:46Z)
• Patch2QL: Discover Cognate Defects in Open Source Software Supply Chain With Auto-generated Static Analysis Rules [1.9591497166224197]
  We propose a novel technique for detecting cognate defects in OSS through the automatic generation of SAST rules. Specifically, it extracts key syntax and semantic information from pre- and post-patch versions of code. We have implemented a prototype tool called Patch2QL and applied it to fundamental OSS in C/C++.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T02:23:11Z)
• Game Rewards Vulnerabilities: Software Vulnerability Detection with Zero-Sum Game and Prototype Learning [17.787508315322906]
  We propose a software vulneRability dEteCtion framework with zerO-sum game and prototype learNing, named RECON. We show that RECON outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline by 6.29% in F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T05:50:42Z)
• Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Codes [83.0342513054389]
  This work proposes a training-free approach for the detection of LLMs-generated codes. We find that existing training-based or zero-shot text detectors are ineffective in detecting code. Our method exhibits robustness against revision attacks and generalizes well to Java codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T10:08:21Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• Transformer-based Vulnerability Detection in Code at EditTime: Zero-shot, Few-shot, or Fine-tuning? [5.603751223376071]
  We present a practical system that leverages deep learning on a large-scale data set of vulnerable code patterns. We show that in comparison with state of the art vulnerability detection models our approach improves the state of the art by 10%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T01:21:55Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• Multi-context Attention Fusion Neural Network for Software Vulnerability Identification [4.05739885420409]
  We propose a deep learning model that learns to detect some of the common categories of security vulnerabilities in source code efficiently. The model builds an accurate understanding of code semantics with a lot less learnable parameters. The proposed AI achieves 98.40% F1-score on specific CWEs from the benchmarked NIST SARD dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T11:50:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.