Evaluating Text Classification Robustness to Part-of-Speech Adversarial Examples

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08374v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:33:54 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Text Classification Robustness to Part-of-Speech Adversarial Examples
• Authors: Anahita Samadi, Allison Sullivan,
• Abstract summary: Adversarial examples are inputs that are designed to trick the decision making process, and are intended to be imperceptible to humans. For text-based classification systems, changes to the input, a string of text, are always perceptible. To improve the quality of text-based adversarial examples, we need to know what elements of the input text are worth focusing on.
• Score: 0.6445605125467574
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As machine learning systems become more widely used, especially for safety critical applications, there is a growing need to ensure that these systems behave as intended, even in the face of adversarial examples. Adversarial examples are inputs that are designed to trick the decision making process, and are intended to be imperceptible to humans. However, for text-based classification systems, changes to the input, a string of text, are always perceptible. Therefore, text-based adversarial examples instead focus on trying to preserve semantics. Unfortunately, recent work has shown this goal is often not met. To improve the quality of text-based adversarial examples, we need to know what elements of the input text are worth focusing on. To address this, in this paper, we explore what parts of speech have the highest impact of text-based classifiers. Our experiments highlight a distinct bias in CNN algorithms against certain parts of speech tokens within review datasets. This finding underscores a critical vulnerability in the linguistic processing capabilities of CNNs.

Related papers

• Enhancing Multilingual Voice Toxicity Detection with Speech-Text Alignment [4.2936749846785345]
  Toxicity classification for voice heavily relies on semantic content of speech. We propose a novel framework that utilizes cross-modal learning to integrate the semantic embedding of text into a multilabel speech toxicity classifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:56:53Z)
• On Adversarial Examples for Text Classification by Perturbing Latent Representations [0.0]
  We show that deep learning is vulnerable to adversarial examples in text classification. This weakness indicates that deep learning is not very robust. We create a framework that measures the robustness of a text classifier by using the gradients of the classifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T18:45:18Z)
• Efficiently Leveraging Linguistic Priors for Scene Text Spotting [63.22351047545888]
  This paper proposes a method that leverages linguistic knowledge from a large text corpus to replace the traditional one-hot encoding used in auto-regressive scene text spotting and recognition models. We generate text distributions that align well with scene text datasets, removing the need for in-domain fine-tuning. Experimental results show that our method not only improves recognition accuracy but also enables more accurate localization of words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T01:57:09Z)
• Context Unlocks Emotions: Text-based Emotion Classification Dataset Auditing with Large Language Models [23.670143829183104]
  The lack of contextual information in text data can make the annotation process of text-based emotion classification datasets challenging. We propose a formal definition of textual context to motivate a prompting strategy to enhance such contextual information. Our method improves alignment between inputs and their human-annotated labels from both an empirical and human-evaluated standpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T21:34:49Z)
• Verifying the Robustness of Automatic Credibility Assessment [50.55687778699995]
  We show that meaning-preserving changes in input text can mislead the models. We also introduce BODEGA: a benchmark for testing both victim models and attack methods on misinformation detection tasks. Our experimental results show that modern large language models are often more vulnerable to attacks than previous, smaller solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T16:11:47Z)
• Classifying text using machine learning models and determining conversation drift [4.785406121053965]
  An analysis of various types of texts is invaluable to understanding both their semantic meaning, as well as their relevance. Text classification is a method of categorising documents. It combines computer text classification and natural language processing to analyse text in aggregate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T18:09:45Z)
• Textual Entailment Recognition with Semantic Features from Empirical Text Representation [60.31047947815282]
  A text entails a hypothesis if and only if the true value of the hypothesis follows the text. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to identifying the textual entailment relationship between text and hypothesis. We employ an element-wise Manhattan distance vector-based feature that can identify the semantic entailment relationship between the text-hypothesis pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T10:03:51Z)
• Span Classification with Structured Information for Disfluency Detection in Spoken Utterances [47.05113261111054]
  We propose a novel architecture for detecting disfluencies in transcripts from spoken utterances. Our proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results on the widely used English Switchboard for disfluency detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T03:22:29Z)
• AES Systems Are Both Overstable And Oversensitive: Explaining Why And Proposing Defenses [66.49753193098356]
  We investigate the reason behind the surprising adversarial brittleness of scoring models. Our results indicate that autoscoring models, despite getting trained as "end-to-end" models, behave like bag-of-words models. We propose detection-based protection models that can detect oversensitivity and overstability causing samples with high accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T03:49:38Z)
• Narrative Incoherence Detection [76.43894977558811]
  We propose the task of narrative incoherence detection as a new arena for inter-sentential semantic understanding. Given a multi-sentence narrative, decide whether there exist any semantic discrepancies in the narrative flow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T07:18:08Z)
• TextScanner: Reading Characters in Order for Robust Scene Text Recognition [60.04267660533966]
  TextScanner is an alternative approach for scene text recognition. It generates pixel-wise, multi-channel segmentation maps for character class, position and order. It also adopts RNN for context modeling and performs paralleled prediction for character position and class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-28T07:52:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.