S-RAF: A Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework for Responsible Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08584v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:37:05 GMT
• Title: S-RAF: A Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework for Responsible Autonomous Driving
• Authors: Daniel Omeiza, Pratik Somaiya, Jo-Ann Pattinson, Carolyn Ten-Holter, Jack Stilgoe, Marina Jirotka, Lars Kunze,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework (S-RAF) for autonomous driving. By quantifying robustness, S-RAF aids developers and stakeholders in building safe and responsible driving agents. S-RAF offers significant advantages, such as reduced testing costs, and the ability to explore edge cases that may be unsafe to test in the real world.
• Score: 6.559634434583204
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) technology advances, ensuring the robustness and safety of AI-driven systems has become paramount. However, varying perceptions of robustness among AI developers create misaligned evaluation metrics, complicating the assessment and certification of safety-critical and complex AI systems such as autonomous driving (AD) agents. To address this challenge, we introduce Simulation-Based Robustness Assessment Framework (S-RAF) for autonomous driving. S-RAF leverages the CARLA Driving simulator to rigorously assess AD agents across diverse conditions, including faulty sensors, environmental changes, and complex traffic situations. By quantifying robustness and its relationship with other safety-critical factors, such as carbon emissions, S-RAF aids developers and stakeholders in building safe and responsible driving agents, and streamlining safety certification processes. Furthermore, S-RAF offers significant advantages, such as reduced testing costs, and the ability to explore edge cases that may be unsafe to test in the real world. The code for this framework is available here: https://github.com/cognitive-robots/rai-leaderboard

Related papers

• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• On STPA for Distributed Development of Safe Autonomous Driving: An Interview Study [0.7851536646859475]
  System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a novel method applied in safety-related fields like defense and aerospace. STPA assumes prerequisites that are not fully valid in the automotive system engineering with distributed system development and multi-abstraction design levels. This can be seen as a maintainability challenge in continuous development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:56:02Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Inherent Diverse Redundant Safety Mechanisms for AI-based Software Elements in Automotive Applications [1.6495054381576084]
  This paper explores the role and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms in autonomous driving systems. A primary concern relates to the ability (and necessity) of AI models to generalize beyond their initial training data. This paper investigates the risk associated with overconfident AI models in safety-critical applications like autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T04:15:26Z)
• Simulation-based Safety Assurance for an AVP System incorporating Learning-Enabled Components [0.6526824510982802]
  Testing, verification and validation AD/ADAS safety-critical applications remain as one the main challenges. We explain the simulation-based development platform that is designed to verify and validate safety-critical learning-enabled systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T09:00:31Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Towards Safe, Explainable, and Regulated Autonomous Driving [11.043966021881426]
  We propose a framework that integrates autonomous control, explainable AI (XAI), and regulatory compliance. We describe relevant XAI approaches that can help achieve the goals of the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-20T05:06:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.