Icing on the Cake: Automatic Code Summarization at Ericsson

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09735v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:49:04 GMT
• Title: Icing on the Cake: Automatic Code Summarization at Ericsson
• Authors: Giriprasad Sridhara, Sujoy Roychowdhury, Sumit Soman, Ranjani H G, Ricardo Britto,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the performance of an approach called Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Prompts (ASAP) We compare the performance of four simpler approaches that do not require static program analysis, information retrieval, or the presence of exemplars.
• Score: 4.145468342589189
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents our findings on the automatic summarization of Java methods within Ericsson, a global telecommunications company. We evaluate the performance of an approach called Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Prompts (ASAP), which uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate leading summary comments for Java methods. ASAP enhances the $LLM's$ prompt context by integrating static program analysis and information retrieval techniques to identify similar exemplar methods along with their developer-written Javadocs, and serves as the baseline in our study. In contrast, we explore and compare the performance of four simpler approaches that do not require static program analysis, information retrieval, or the presence of exemplars as in the ASAP method. Our methods rely solely on the Java method body as input, making them lightweight and more suitable for rapid deployment in commercial software development environments. We conducted experiments on an Ericsson software project and replicated the study using two widely-used open-source Java projects, Guava and Elasticsearch, to ensure the reliability of our results. Performance was measured across eight metrics that capture various aspects of similarity. Notably, one of our simpler approaches performed as well as or better than the ASAP method on both the Ericsson project and the open-source projects. Additionally, we performed an ablation study to examine the impact of method names on Javadoc summary generation across our four proposed approaches and the ASAP method. By masking the method names and observing the generated summaries, we found that our approaches were statistically significantly less influenced by the absence of method names compared to the baseline. This suggests that our methods are more robust to variations in method names and may derive summaries more comprehensively from the method body than the ASAP approach.

Related papers

• Embracing Objects Over Statics: An Analysis of Method Preferences in Open Source Java Frameworks [0.0]
  This study scrutinizes the runtime behavior of 28 open-source Java frameworks using the YourKit profiler. Contrary to expectations, our findings reveal a predominant use of instance methods and constructors over static methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T02:30:20Z)
• Automating Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Literature via LLMs: A Dual-Agent Approach with Progressive Ontology Prompting [59.97247234955861]
  We introduce a novel framework based on large language models (LLMs) that combines a progressive prompting algorithm with a dual-agent system, named LLM-Duo. Our method identifies 2,421 interventions from 64,177 research articles in the speech-language therapy domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:42:23Z)
• Efficient Prompting Methods for Large Language Models: A Survey [50.171011917404485]
  Prompting has become a mainstream paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific natural language processing tasks. This approach brings the additional computational burden of model inference and human effort to guide and control the behavior of LLMs. We present the basic concepts of prompting, review the advances for efficient prompting, and highlight future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T12:19:08Z)
• Generating Java Methods: An Empirical Assessment of Four AI-Based Code Assistants [5.32539007352208]
  We assess the effectiveness of four popular AI-based code assistants, namely GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, ChatGPT, and Google Bard. Results show that Copilot is often more accurate than other techniques, yet none of the assistants is completely subsumed by the rest of the approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T12:59:20Z)
• Relation-aware Ensemble Learning for Knowledge Graph Embedding [68.94900786314666]
  We propose to learn an ensemble by leveraging existing methods in a relation-aware manner. exploring these semantics using relation-aware ensemble leads to a much larger search space than general ensemble methods. We propose a divide-search-combine algorithm RelEns-DSC that searches the relation-wise ensemble weights independently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:40:12Z)
• Pushing the Limits of Learning-based Traversability Analysis for Autonomous Driving on CPU [1.841057463340778]
  This paper proposes and evaluates a real-time machine learning-based Traversability Analysis method. We show that integrating a new set of geometric and visual features and focusing on important implementation details enables a noticeable boost in performance and reliability. The proposed approach has been compared with state-of-the-art Deep Learning approaches on a public dataset of outdoor driving scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T07:57:34Z)
• FewNLU: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Methods for Few-Shot Natural Language Understanding [89.92513889132825]
  We introduce an evaluation framework that improves previous evaluation procedures in three key aspects, i.e., test performance, dev-test correlation, and stability. We open-source our toolkit, FewNLU, that implements our evaluation framework along with a number of state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T00:57:30Z)
• Exploiting Method Names to Improve Code Summarization: A Deliberation Multi-Task Learning Approach [5.577102440028882]
  We design a novel multi-task learning (MTL) approach for code summarization. We first introduce the tasks of generation and informativeness prediction of method names. A novel two-pass deliberation mechanism is then incorporated into our MTL architecture to generate more consistent intermediate states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T17:52:21Z)
• SAMBA: Safe Model-Based & Active Reinforcement Learning [59.01424351231993]
  SAMBA is a framework for safe reinforcement learning that combines aspects from probabilistic modelling, information theory, and statistics. We evaluate our algorithm on a variety of safe dynamical system benchmarks involving both low and high-dimensional state representations. We provide intuition as to the effectiveness of the framework by a detailed analysis of our active metrics and safety constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T10:40:46Z)
• Guided Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization: Combining Learning and Model-Based Strategies for Sample-Efficient Policy Learning [75.56839075060819]
  Traditional robotic approaches rely on an accurate model of the environment, a detailed description of how to perform the task, and a robust perception system to keep track of the current state. reinforcement learning approaches can operate directly from raw sensory inputs with only a reward signal to describe the task, but are extremely sample-inefficient and brittle. In this work, we combine the strengths of model-based methods with the flexibility of learning-based methods to obtain a general method that is able to overcome inaccuracies in the robotics perception/actuation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T19:47:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.