Automated Detection of Algorithm Debt in Deep Learning Frameworks: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10529v3
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:40:50 GMT
• Title: Automated Detection of Algorithm Debt in Deep Learning Frameworks: An Empirical Study
• Authors: Emmanuel Iko-Ojo Simon, Chirath Hettiarachchi, Alex Potanin, Hanna Suominen, Fatemeh Fard,
• Abstract summary: Previous studies demonstrate that Machine or Deep Learning (ML/DL) models can detect Technical Debt from source code comments called Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) Our goal is to improve AD detection performance of various ML/DL models.
• Score: 5.6340045820686155
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Previous studies demonstrate that Machine or Deep Learning (ML/DL) models can detect Technical Debt from source code comments called Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD). Despite the importance of ML/DL in software development, limited studies focus on automated detection for new SATD types: Algorithm Debt (AD). AD detection is important because it helps to identify TD early, facilitating research, learning, and preventing the accumulation of issues related to model degradation and lack of scalability. Aim: Our goal is to improve AD detection performance of various ML/DL models. Method: We will perform empirical studies using approaches: TF-IDF, Count Vectorizer, Hash Vectorizer, and TD-indicative words to identify features that improve AD detection, using ML/DL classifiers with different data featurisations. We will use an existing dataset curated from seven DL frameworks where comments were manually classified as AD, Compatibility, Defect, Design, Documentation, Requirement, and Test Debt. We will explore various word embedding methods to further enrich features for ML models. These embeddings will be from models founded in DL such as ROBERTA, ALBERTv2, and large language models (LLMs): INSTRUCTOR and VOYAGE AI. We will enrich the dataset by incorporating AD-related terms, then train various ML/DL classifiers, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, ROBERTA, and ALBERTv2.

Related papers

• Analysis of Zero Day Attack Detection Using MLP and XAI [0.0]
  This paper analyzes Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) based approaches to create Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) The focus is on using the KDD99 dataset, which has the most research done among all the datasets for detecting zero-day attacks. We evaluate the performance of four multilayer perceptron (MLP) trained on the KDD99 dataset, including baseline ML models, weighted ML models, truncated ML models, and weighted truncated ML models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T02:20:34Z)
• AD-LLM: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Anomaly Detection [50.57641458208208]
  This paper introduces AD-LLM, the first benchmark that evaluates how large language models can help with anomaly detection. We examine three key tasks: zero-shot detection, using LLMs' pre-trained knowledge to perform AD without tasks-specific training; data augmentation, generating synthetic data and category descriptions to improve AD models; and model selection, using LLMs to suggest unsupervised AD models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T10:22:14Z)
• Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
  This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance. Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z)
• Long-Tailed Anomaly Detection with Learnable Class Names [64.79139468331807]
  We introduce several datasets with different levels of class imbalance and metrics for performance evaluation. We then propose a novel method, LTAD, to detect defects from multiple and long-tailed classes, without relying on dataset class names. LTAD substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for most forms of dataset imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T15:26:44Z)
• Self-Admitted Technical Debt Detection Approaches: A Decade Systematic Review [5.670597842524448]
  Technical debt (TD) represents the long-term costs associated with suboptimal design or code decisions in software development. Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) occurs when developers explicitly acknowledge these trade-offs. automated detection of SATD has become an increasingly important research area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T12:01:13Z)
• Interpretability at Scale: Identifying Causal Mechanisms in Alpaca [62.65877150123775]
  We use Boundless DAS to efficiently search for interpretable causal structure in large language models while they follow instructions. Our findings mark a first step toward faithfully understanding the inner-workings of our ever-growing and most widely deployed language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:15:40Z)
• Data-Efficient and Interpretable Tabular Anomaly Detection [54.15249463477813]
  We propose a novel framework that adapts a white-box model class, Generalized Additive Models, to detect anomalies. In addition, the proposed framework, DIAD, can incorporate a small amount of labeled data to further boost anomaly detection performances in semi-supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T22:02:56Z)
• From Model-driven to Data-driven: A Survey on Active Deep Learning [8.75286974962136]
  Active Deep Learning (ADL) only if theirpredictor is deep model, where the basic learner is called as predictor and the labeling schemes iscalled selector. Wecategory ADL into model-driven ADL and data-driven ADL, by whether its selector is model-driven or data-driven. The advantages and disadvantages between data-driven ADLand model-driven ADL are thoroughly analyzed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T07:49:41Z)
• Stance Detection Benchmark: How Robust Is Your Stance Detection? [65.91772010586605]
  Stance Detection (StD) aims to detect an author's stance towards a certain topic or claim. We introduce a StD benchmark that learns from ten StD datasets of various domains in a multi-dataset learning setting. Within this benchmark setup, we are able to present new state-of-the-art results on five of the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T13:37:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.