Reconciling Methodological Paradigms: Employing Large Language Models as Novice Qualitative Research Assistants in Talent Management Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11043v1
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:49:51 GMT
- Title: Reconciling Methodological Paradigms: Employing Large Language Models as Novice Qualitative Research Assistants in Talent Management Research
- Authors: Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Satya Kapoor, Alex Gil, Anshul Mittal, Rutu Mulkar,
- Abstract summary: This study proposes a novel approach by leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Large Language Models (LLMs) for analyzing interview transcripts.
The novelty of this work lies in strategizing the research inquiry as one that is augmented by an LLM that serves as a novice research assistant.
Our findings demonstrate that the LLM-augmented RAG approach can successfully extract topics of interest, with significant coverage compared to manually generated topics.
- Score: 1.0949553365997655
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Qualitative data collection and analysis approaches, such as those employing interviews and focus groups, provide rich insights into customer attitudes, sentiment, and behavior. However, manually analyzing qualitative data requires extensive time and effort to identify relevant topics and thematic insights. This study proposes a novel approach to address this challenge by leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Large Language Models (LLMs) for analyzing interview transcripts. The novelty of this work lies in strategizing the research inquiry as one that is augmented by an LLM that serves as a novice research assistant. This research explores the mental model of LLMs to serve as novice qualitative research assistants for researchers in the talent management space. A RAG-based LLM approach is extended to enable topic modeling of semi-structured interview data, showcasing the versatility of these models beyond their traditional use in information retrieval and search. Our findings demonstrate that the LLM-augmented RAG approach can successfully extract topics of interest, with significant coverage compared to manually generated topics from the same dataset. This establishes the viability of employing LLMs as novice qualitative research assistants. Additionally, the study recommends that researchers leveraging such models lean heavily on quality criteria used in traditional qualitative research to ensure rigor and trustworthiness of their approach. Finally, the paper presents key recommendations for industry practitioners seeking to reconcile the use of LLMs with established qualitative research paradigms, providing a roadmap for the effective integration of these powerful, albeit novice, AI tools in the analysis of qualitative datasets within talent
Related papers
- 'Simulacrum of Stories': Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research Participants [13.693069737188859]
Recent excitement around generative models has sparked a wave of proposals suggesting the replacement of human participation and labor in research and development.
We conducted interviews with 19 qualitative researchers to understand their perspectives on this paradigm shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-28T18:28:47Z) - From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems.
The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness.
This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z) - Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation [63.50597360948099]
Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks.
We propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement.
We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T16:41:08Z) - Data-Centric AI in the Age of Large Language Models [51.20451986068925]
This position paper proposes a data-centric viewpoint of AI research, focusing on large language models (LLMs)
We make the key observation that data is instrumental in the developmental (e.g., pretraining and fine-tuning) and inferential stages (e.g., in-context learning) of LLMs.
We identify four specific scenarios centered around data, covering data-centric benchmarks and data curation, data attribution, knowledge transfer, and inference contextualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T16:34:07Z) - Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in various research domains.
This article examines their potential through a literature review and firsthand experimentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T15:53:06Z) - Automating Research Synthesis with Domain-Specific Large Language Model Fine-Tuning [0.9110413356918055]
This research pioneers the use of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate Systematic Literature Reviews ( SLRs)
Our study employed the latest fine-tuning methodologies together with open-sourced LLMs, and demonstrated a practical and efficient approach to automating the final execution stages of an SLR process.
The results maintained high fidelity in factual accuracy in LLM responses, and were validated through the replication of an existing PRISMA-conforming SLR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T00:08:29Z) - LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges.
Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model.
This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z) - Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted
Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis [6.592797748561459]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled collaborative human-bot interactions in Software Engineering (SE)
We introduce a new dimension of scalability and accuracy in qualitative research, potentially transforming data interpretation methodologies in SE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T13:10:46Z) - Expanding Horizons in HCI Research Through LLM-Driven Qualitative
Analysis [3.5253513747455303]
We introduce a new approach to qualitative analysis in HCI using Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our findings indicate that LLMs not only match the efficacy of traditional analysis methods but also offer unique insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T12:39:31Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation [77.91673633328148]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This survey presents a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms, respectively Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T13:51:26Z) - Information Extraction in Low-Resource Scenarios: Survey and Perspective [56.5556523013924]
Information Extraction seeks to derive structured information from unstructured texts.
This paper presents a review of neural approaches to low-resource IE from emphtraditional and emphLLM-based perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-16T13:44:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.