Diagnosing and Remedying Knowledge Deficiencies in LLMs via Label-free Curricular Meaningful Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11431v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:39:49 GMT
• Title: Diagnosing and Remedying Knowledge Deficiencies in LLMs via Label-free Curricular Meaningful Learning
• Authors: Kai Xiong, Xiao Ding, Li Du, Jiahao Ying, Ting Liu, Bing Qin, Yixin Cao,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are versatile and demonstrate impressive generalization ability. They still exhibit reasoning mistakes, often stemming from knowledge deficiencies. We propose a label-free curricular meaningful learning framework (LaMer) to diagnose and remedy the knowledge deficiencies of LLMs.
• Score: 42.38865072597821
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are versatile and demonstrate impressive generalization ability by mining and learning information from extensive unlabeled text. However, they still exhibit reasoning mistakes, often stemming from knowledge deficiencies, which can affect their trustworthiness and reliability. Although users can provide diverse and comprehensive queries, obtaining sufficient and effective feedback is demanding. Furthermore, evaluating LLMs comprehensively with limited labeled samples is difficult. This makes it a challenge to diagnose and remedy the deficiencies of LLMs through rich label-free user queries. To tackle this challenge, we propose a label-free curricular meaningful learning framework (LaMer). LaMer first employs relative entropy to automatically diagnose and quantify the knowledge deficiencies of LLMs in a label-free setting. Next, to remedy the diagnosed knowledge deficiencies, we apply curricular meaningful learning: first, we adopt meaningful learning to adaptively synthesize augmentation data according to the severity of the deficiencies, and then design a curricular deficiency remedy strategy to remedy the knowledge deficiencies of LLMs progressively. Experiments show that LaMer efficiently and effectively diagnoses and remedies knowledge deficiencies in LLMs, improving various LLMs across seven out-of-distribution (OOD) reasoning and language understanding benchmarks, achieving comparable results to baselines with just 40\% training data. LaMer even surpasses methods that rely on labeled datasets for deficiency diagnosis. In application, our label-free method can offer an effective knowledge deficiency diagnostic tool for efficient LLM development.

Related papers

• Effective LLM Knowledge Learning via Model Generalization [73.16975077770765]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on enormous documents that contain extensive world knowledge. It is still not well-understood how knowledge is acquired via autoregressive pre-training. In this paper, we focus on understanding and improving LLM knowledge learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T17:56:20Z)
• Fact or Guesswork? Evaluating Large Language Model's Medical Knowledge with Structured One-Hop Judgment [108.55277188617035]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in various downstream task domains, but their ability to directly recall and apply factual medical knowledge remains under-explored. Most existing medical QA benchmarks assess complex reasoning or multi-hop inference, making it difficult to isolate LLMs' inherent medical knowledge from their reasoning capabilities. We introduce the Medical Knowledge Judgment, a dataset specifically designed to measure LLMs' one-hop factual medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T05:27:51Z)
• Beyond Single-Value Metrics: Evaluating and Enhancing LLM Unlearning with Cognitive Diagnosis [34.62178125699054]
  UNCD (UNlearning evaluation via Cognitive Diagnosis) is a novel framework for fine-grained evaluation of LLM unlearning. Our benchmark, UNCD-Cyber, provides a detailed assessment of the removal of dangerous capabilities. Our dedicated benchmark, UNCD-Cyber, provides a detailed assessment of the removal of dangerous capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:56:59Z)
• Large language models enabled multiagent ensemble method for efficient EHR data labeling [9.481473827205159]
  This study introduces a novel multiagent ensemble method powered by LLMs to address a key challenge in ML - data labeling. By using the ensemble LLMs and natural language processing, we labeled MIMIC-IV ECG dataset of 623,566 ECG reports with an estimated accuracy of 98.2%. We applied the ensemble LLMs method to identify SDOH from social history sections of 1,405 EHR clinical notes, also achieving competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:12:00Z)
• Reliable and diverse evaluation of LLM medical knowledge mastery [6.825565574784612]
  We propose a novel framework that generates reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate medical-specific LLMs. We use our proposed framework to systematically investigate the mastery of medical factual knowledge of 12 well-known LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T03:13:38Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Models [83.5849717262019]
  We propose a knowledge-aware fine-tuning (KnowTuning) method to improve fine-grained and coarse-grained knowledge awareness of LLMs. KnowTuning generates more facts with less factual error rate under fine-grained facts evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:54:32Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• HyKGE: A Hypothesis Knowledge Graph Enhanced Framework for Accurate and Reliable Medical LLMs Responses [20.635793525894872]
  We develop a Hypothesis Knowledge Graph Enhanced (HyKGE) framework to improve the accuracy and reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) Specifically, HyKGE explores the zero-shot capability and the rich knowledge of LLMs with Hypothesis Outputs to extend feasible exploration directions in the KGs. Experiments on two Chinese medical multiple-choice question datasets and one Chinese open-domain medical Q&A dataset with two LLM turbos demonstrate the superiority of HyKGE in terms of accuracy and explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T04:49:56Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.