Reliable and diverse evaluation of LLM medical knowledge mastery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14302v2
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:17:35 GMT
• Title: Reliable and diverse evaluation of LLM medical knowledge mastery
• Authors: Yuxuan Zhou, Xien Liu, Chen Ning, Xiao Zhang, Ji Wu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework that generates reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate medical-specific LLMs. We use our proposed framework to systematically investigate the mastery of medical factual knowledge of 12 well-known LLMs.
• Score: 6.825565574784612
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mastering medical knowledge is crucial for medical-specific LLMs. However, despite the existence of medical benchmarks like MedQA, a unified framework that fully leverages existing knowledge bases to evaluate LLMs' mastery of medical knowledge is still lacking. In the study, we propose a novel framework PretexEval that dynamically generates reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate LLMs for any given medical knowledge base. We notice that test samples produced directly from knowledge bases by templates or LLMs may introduce factual errors and also lack diversity. To address these issues, we introduce a novel schema into our proposed evaluation framework that employs predicate equivalence transformations to produce a series of variants for any given medical knowledge point. Finally, these produced predicate variants are converted into textual language, resulting in a series of reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate whether LLMs fully master the given medical factual knowledge point. Here, we use our proposed framework to systematically investigate the mastery of medical factual knowledge of 12 well-known LLMs, based on two knowledge bases that are crucial for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The evaluation results illustrate that current LLMs still exhibit significant deficiencies in fully mastering medical knowledge, despite achieving considerable success on some famous public benchmarks. These new findings provide valuable insights for developing medical-specific LLMs, highlighting that current LLMs urgently need to strengthen their comprehensive and in-depth mastery of medical knowledge before being applied to real-world medical scenarios.

Related papers

• CliMedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models in Clinical Scenarios [50.032101237019205]
  CliMedBench is a comprehensive benchmark with 14 expert-guided core clinical scenarios. The reliability of this benchmark has been confirmed in several ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:15:36Z)
• MedREQAL: Examining Medical Knowledge Recall of Large Language Models via Question Answering [5.065947993017158]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated an impressive ability to encode knowledge during pre-training on large text corpora. We examine the capability of LLMs to exhibit medical knowledge recall by constructing a novel dataset derived from systematic reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T16:33:28Z)
• MultifacetEval: Multifaceted Evaluation to Probe LLMs in Mastering Medical Knowledge [4.8004472307210255]
  Large language models (LLMs) have excelled across domains, delivering notable performance on medical evaluation benchmarks. However, there still exists a significant gap between the reported performance and the practical effectiveness in real-world medical scenarios. We develop a novel evaluation framework MultifacetEval to examine the degree and coverage of LLMs in encoding and mastering medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T04:15:07Z)
• Asclepius: A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models [59.60384461302662]
  We introduce Asclepius, a novel benchmark for evaluating Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) Asclepius rigorously and comprehensively assesses model capability in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities. We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 5 human specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z)
• MedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models [56.36916128631784]
  We introduce MedBench, a comprehensive benchmark for the Chinese medical domain. This benchmark is composed of four key components: the Chinese Medical Licensing Examination, the Resident Standardization Training Examination, and real-world clinic cases. We perform extensive experiments and conduct an in-depth analysis from diverse perspectives, which culminate in the following findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T07:01:49Z)
• A Survey of Large Language Models in Medicine: Progress, Application, and Challenge [85.09998659355038]
  Large language models (LLMs) have received substantial attention due to their capabilities for understanding and generating human language. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the development and deployment of LLMs in medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T02:55:58Z)
• Large Language Models Illuminate a Progressive Pathway to Artificial Healthcare Assistant: A Review [16.008511195589925]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in mimicking human-level language comprehension and reasoning. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the applications and implications of LLMs in medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:51:36Z)
• Knowledge-tuning Large Language Models with Structured Medical Knowledge Bases for Reliable Response Generation in Chinese [29.389119917322102]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in diverse natural language processing (NLP) tasks in general domains. We propose knowledge-tuning, which leverages structured medical knowledge bases for the LLMs to grasp domain knowledge efficiently. We also release cMedKnowQA, a Chinese medical knowledge question-answering dataset constructed from medical knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T07:42:57Z)
• Eva-KELLM: A New Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Editing of LLMs [54.22416829200613]
  Eva-KELLM is a new benchmark for evaluating knowledge editing of large language models. Experimental results indicate that the current methods for knowledge editing using raw documents are not effective in yielding satisfactory results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T09:17:19Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.