VE-Bench: Subjective-Aligned Benchmark Suite for Text-Driven Video Editing Quality Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11481v2
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:55:40 GMT
• Title: VE-Bench: Subjective-Aligned Benchmark Suite for Text-Driven Video Editing Quality Assessment
• Authors: Shangkun Sun, Xiaoyu Liang, Songlin Fan, Wenxu Gao, Wei Gao,
• Abstract summary: We introduce VE-Bench, a benchmark suite tailored to the assessment of text-driven video editing. This suite includes VE-Bench DB, a video quality assessment (VQA) database for video editing. VE-Bench QA focuses on the text-video alignment and the relevance modeling between source and edited videos.
• Score: 6.627422081288281
• License:
• Abstract: Text-driven video editing has recently experienced rapid development. Despite this, evaluating edited videos remains a considerable challenge. Current metrics tend to fail to align with human perceptions, and effective quantitative metrics for video editing are still notably absent. To address this, we introduce VE-Bench, a benchmark suite tailored to the assessment of text-driven video editing. This suite includes VE-Bench DB, a video quality assessment (VQA) database for video editing. VE-Bench DB encompasses a diverse set of source videos featuring various motions and subjects, along with multiple distinct editing prompts, editing results from 8 different models, and the corresponding Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) from 24 human annotators. Based on VE-Bench DB, we further propose VE-Bench QA, a quantitative human-aligned measurement for the text-driven video editing task. In addition to the aesthetic, distortion, and other visual quality indicators that traditional VQA methods emphasize, VE-Bench QA focuses on the text-video alignment and the relevance modeling between source and edited videos. It proposes a new assessment network for video editing that attains superior performance in alignment with human preferences. To the best of our knowledge, VE-Bench introduces the first quality assessment dataset for video editing and an effective subjective-aligned quantitative metric for this domain. All data and code will be publicly available at https://github.com/littlespray/VE-Bench.

Related papers

• MIVE: New Design and Benchmark for Multi-Instance Video Editing [27.706882926164724]
  MIVE is a general-purpose mask-based framework, not dedicated to specific objects (e.g., people) MIVE introduces two key modules: Disentangled Multi-instance Sampling (DMS) to prevent editing leakage and Instance-centric Probability Redistribution (IPR) to ensure precise localization and faithful editing. Our extensive qualitative, quantitative, and user study evaluations demonstrate that MIVE significantly outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods in terms of editing faithfulness, accuracy, and leakage prevention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T13:00:04Z)
• StableV2V: Stablizing Shape Consistency in Video-to-Video Editing [11.09708780767668]
  We present a shape-consistent video editing method, namely StableV2V, in this paper. Our method decomposes the entire editing pipeline into several sequential procedures, where it edits the first video frame, then establishes an alignment between the delivered motions and user prompts, and eventually propagates the edited contents to all other frames based on such alignment. Experimental results and analyses illustrate the outperforming performance, visual consistency, and inference efficiency of our method compared to existing state-of-the-art studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T11:48:01Z)
• EditBoard: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Text-Based Video Editing Models [16.045012576543474]
  Text-based video editing has emerged as a promising field, enabling precise modifications to videos based on text prompts. Existing evaluations are limited and inconsistent, typically summarizing overall performance with a single score. We propose EditBoard, the first comprehensive evaluation benchmark for text-based video editing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T08:43:18Z)
• Beyond Raw Videos: Understanding Edited Videos with Large Multimodal Model [62.38322742493649]
  We build a video VQA benchmark covering editing categories, i.e., effect, funny, meme, and game. Most of the open-source video LMMs perform poorly on the benchmark, indicating a huge domain gap between edited short videos on social media and regular raw videos. To improve the generalization ability of LMMs, we collect a training set for the proposed benchmark based on both Panda-70M/WebVid raw videos and small-scale TikTok/CapCut edited videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T03:28:52Z)
• Subjective-Aligned Dataset and Metric for Text-to-Video Quality Assessment [54.00254267259069]
  We establish the largest-scale Text-to-Video Quality Assessment DataBase (T2VQA-DB) to date. The dataset is composed of 10,000 videos generated by 9 different T2V models. We propose a novel transformer-based model for subjective-aligned Text-to-Video Quality Assessment (T2VQA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T16:52:49Z)
• Towards A Better Metric for Text-to-Video Generation [102.16250512265995]
  Generative models have demonstrated remarkable capability in synthesizing high-quality text, images, and videos. We introduce a novel evaluation pipeline, the Text-to-Video Score (T2VScore) This metric integrates two pivotal criteria: (1) Text-Video Alignment, which scrutinizes the fidelity of the video in representing the given text description, and (2) Video Quality, which evaluates the video's overall production caliber with a mixture of experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T15:42:39Z)
• VIDiff: Translating Videos via Multi-Modal Instructions with Diffusion Models [96.55004961251889]
  Video Instruction Diffusion (VIDiff) is a unified foundation model designed for a wide range of video tasks. Our model can edit and translate the desired results within seconds based on user instructions. We provide convincing generative results for diverse input videos and written instructions, both qualitatively and quantitatively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:59:52Z)
• Video-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Video-based Large Language Models [81.84810348214113]
  Video-based large language models (Video-LLMs) have been recently introduced, targeting both fundamental improvements in perception and comprehension, and a diverse range of user inquiries. To guide the development of such a model, the establishment of a robust and comprehensive evaluation system becomes crucial. This paper proposes textitVideo-Bench, a new comprehensive benchmark along with a toolkit specifically designed for evaluating Video-LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T18:59:58Z)
• The Anatomy of Video Editing: A Dataset and Benchmark Suite for AI-Assisted Video Editing [90.59584961661345]
  This work introduces the Anatomy of Video Editing, a dataset, and benchmark, to foster research in AI-assisted video editing. Our benchmark suite focuses on video editing tasks, beyond visual effects, such as automatic footage organization and assisted video assembling. To enable research on these fronts, we annotate more than 1.5M tags, with relevant concepts to cinematography, from 196176 shots sampled from movie scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T10:53:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.