Large Language Models as Foundations for Next-Gen Dense Retrieval: A Comprehensive Empirical Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12194v2
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 06:46:41 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models as Foundations for Next-Gen Dense Retrieval: A Comprehensive Empirical Assessment
- Authors: Kun Luo, Minghao Qin, Zheng Liu, Shitao Xiao, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu,
- Abstract summary: Pretrained language models like BERT and T5 serve as crucial backbone encoders for dense retrieval.
Recent research has explored using large language models (LLMs) as retrievers, achieving SOTA performance across various tasks.
- Score: 16.39696580487218
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Pretrained language models like BERT and T5 serve as crucial backbone encoders for dense retrieval. However, these models often exhibit limited generalization capabilities and face challenges in improving in domain accuracy. Recent research has explored using large language models (LLMs) as retrievers, achieving SOTA performance across various tasks. Despite these advancements, the specific benefits of LLMs over traditional retrievers and the impact of different LLM configurations, such as parameter sizes, pretraining duration, and alignment processes on retrieval tasks remain unclear. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study on a wide range of retrieval tasks, including in domain accuracy, data efficiency, zero shot generalization, lengthy retrieval, instruction based retrieval, and multi task learning. We evaluate over 15 different backbone LLMs and non LLMs. Our findings reveal that larger models and extensive pretraining consistently enhance in domain accuracy and data efficiency. Additionally, larger models demonstrate significant potential in zero shot generalization, lengthy retrieval, instruction based retrieval, and multi task learning. These results underscore the advantages of LLMs as versatile and effective backbone encoders in dense retrieval, providing valuable insights for future research and development in this field.
Related papers
- Invar-RAG: Invariant LLM-aligned Retrieval for Better Generation [43.630437906898635]
We propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning architecture called Invar-RAG.
In the retrieval stage, an LLM-based retriever is constructed by integrating LoRA-based representation learning.
In the generation stage, a refined fine-tuning method is employed to improve LLM accuracy in generating answers based on retrieved information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T14:25:37Z) - Dynamic Uncertainty Ranking: Enhancing In-Context Learning for Long-Tail Knowledge in LLMs [50.29035873837]
Large language models (LLMs) can learn vast amounts of knowledge from diverse domains during pre-training.
Long-tail knowledge from specialized domains is often scarce and underrepresented, rarely appearing in the models' memorization.
We propose a reinforcement learning-based dynamic uncertainty ranking method for ICL that accounts for the varying impact of each retrieved sample on LLM predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T03:42:17Z) - Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.312330150540912]
An emerging application is using Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) capabilities.
We propose FRAMES, a high-quality evaluation dataset designed to test LLMs' ability to provide factual responses.
We present baseline results demonstrating that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with this task, achieving 0.40 accuracy with no retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T17:52:07Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - From Generalist to Specialist: Improving Large Language Models for Medical Physics Using ARCoT [0.0]
ARCoT (Adaptable Retrieval-based Chain of Thought) is a framework designed to enhance the domain-specific accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our model outperformed standard LLMs and reported average human performance, demonstrating improvements of up to 68%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T18:31:38Z) - LLM In-Context Recall is Prompt Dependent [0.0]
A model's ability to do this significantly influences its practical efficacy and dependability in real-world applications.
This study demonstrates that an LLM's recall capability is not only contingent upon the prompt's content but also may be compromised by biases in its training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T01:13:59Z) - Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks.
However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs.
We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z) - Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG.
InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks.
It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - The Truth is in There: Improving Reasoning in Language Models with
Layer-Selective Rank Reduction [22.659005954676598]
We show that it is possible to significantly improve the performance of Large Language Models by selectively removing higher-order components of their weight matrices.
This simple intervention, which we call LAyer-SElective Rank reduction (LASER), can be done on a model after training has completed.
We show extensive experiments demonstrating the generality of this finding across language models and datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T03:51:08Z) - To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs.
We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting.
Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.