Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13637v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:52:26 GMT
• Title: Temporal Elections: Welfare, Strategyproofness, and Proportionality
• Authors: Edith Elkind, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Nicholas Teh,
• Abstract summary: We focus on two objectives-utilitarian welfare (Util) and egalitarian welfare (Egal)-and consider the computational complexity of the associated problems. We observe that maximizing Util is easy, but the corresponding decision problem for Egal is NP-complete even in restricted cases.
• Score: 21.36300710262896
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We investigate a model of sequential decision-making where a single alternative is chosen at each round. We focus on two objectives-utilitarian welfare (Util) and egalitarian welfare (Egal)-and consider the computational complexity of the associated maximization problems, as well as their compatibility with strategyproofness and proportionality. We observe that maximizing Util is easy, but the corresponding decision problem for Egal is NP-complete even in restricted cases. We complement this hardness result for Egal with parameterized complexity analysis and an approximation algorithm. Additionally, we show that, while a mechanism that outputs a Util outcome is strategyproof, all deterministic mechanisms for computing Egal outcomes fail a very weak variant of strategyproofness, called non-obvious manipulability (NOM). However, we show that when agents have non-empty approval sets at each timestep, choosing an Egal-maximizing outcome while breaking ties lexicographically satisfies NOM. Regarding proportionality, we prove that a proportional (PROP) outcome can be computed efficiently, but finding an outcome that maximizes Util while guaranteeing PROP is NP-hard. We also derive upper and lower bounds on the price of proportionality with respect to Util and Egal.

Related papers

• Anytime-Constrained Reinforcement Learning [6.981971551979697]
  We introduce and study constrained Markov Decision Processes (cMDPs) with anytime constraints. We show that there exist optimal deterministic policies augmented with cumulative costs. We show that computing non-trivial approximately optimal policies is NP-hard in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:51:26Z)
• Online POMDP Planning with Anytime Deterministic Guarantees [11.157761902108692]
  Planning under uncertainty can be mathematically formalized using partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) Finding an optimal plan for POMDPs can be computationally expensive and is feasible only for small tasks. We derive a deterministic relationship between a simplified solution that is easier to obtain and the theoretically optimal one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T04:40:38Z)
• Instance-Optimality in Interactive Decision Making: Toward a Non-Asymptotic Theory [30.061707627742766]
  We aim for instance-optimality, a strong notion of adaptivity which asserts that, on any particular problem instance, the algorithm under consideration outperforms all consistent algorithms. In this paper, we take the first step toward developing a non-asymptotic theory of instance-optimal decision making with general function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T21:51:58Z)
• Optimal Sparse Recovery with Decision Stumps [7.24496247221802]
  We show that tree based methods attain strong feature selection properties under a wide variety of settings. As a byproduct of our analysis, we show that we can provably guarantee recovery even when the number of active features $s$ is unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T00:43:06Z)
• Stochastic Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Method for Nonconvex Expectation Constrained Optimization [88.0031283949404]
  Many real-world problems have complicated non functional constraints and use a large number of data points. Our proposed method outperforms an existing method with the previously best-known result.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T14:48:54Z)
• Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning [68.86485583981866]
  We propose Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization (P3O), which solves the cumbersome constrained policy iteration via a single minimization of an equivalent unconstrained problem. P3O utilizes a simple-yet-effective penalty function to eliminate cost constraints and removes the trust-region constraint by the clipped surrogate objective. We show that P3O outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms with respect to both reward improvement and constraint satisfaction on a set of constrained locomotive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T06:15:51Z)
• A Boosting Approach to Reinforcement Learning [59.46285581748018]
  We study efficient algorithms for reinforcement learning in decision processes whose complexity is independent of the number of states. We give an efficient algorithm that is capable of improving the accuracy of such weak learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T16:00:45Z)
• Navigating to the Best Policy in Markov Decision Processes [68.8204255655161]
  We investigate the active pure exploration problem in Markov Decision Processes. Agent sequentially selects actions and, from the resulting system trajectory, aims at the best as fast as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T09:16:28Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
• Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
  We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function. It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)
• Tightly Robust Optimization via Empirical Domain Reduction [22.63829081634384]
  We propose an algorithm to determine the scale such that the solution has a good objective value. Under some regularity conditions, the scale obtained by our algorithm is $O(sqrtn)$, whereas the scale obtained by a standard approach is $O(sqrtd/n)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T12:24:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.