Narratives at Conflict: Computational Analysis of News Framing in Multilingual Disinformation Campaigns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13651v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 18:51:47 GMT
• Title: Narratives at Conflict: Computational Analysis of News Framing in Multilingual Disinformation Campaigns
• Authors: Antonina Sinelnik, Dirk Hovy,
• Abstract summary: We explore how multilingual framing of the same issue differs systematically. We use eight years of Russia-backed disinformation campaigns, spanning 8k news articles in 4 languages targeting 15 countries. We find that disinformation campaigns consistently and intentionally favor specific framing, depending on the target language of the audience.
• Score: 22.05782818652258
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Any report frames issues to favor a particular interpretation by highlighting or excluding certain aspects of a story. Despite the widespread use of framing in disinformation, framing properties and detection methods remain underexplored outside the English-speaking world. We explore how multilingual framing of the same issue differs systematically. We use eight years of Russia-backed disinformation campaigns, spanning 8k news articles in 4 languages targeting 15 countries. We find that disinformation campaigns consistently and intentionally favor specific framing, depending on the target language of the audience. We further discover how Russian-language articles consistently highlight selected frames depending on the region of the media coverage. We find that the two most prominent models for automatic frame analysis underperform and show high disagreement, highlighting the need for further research.

Related papers

• Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on Wikipedia [49.80565462746646]
  We introduce the InfoGap method -- an efficient and reliable approach to locating information gaps and inconsistencies in articles at the fact level. We evaluate InfoGap by analyzing LGBT people's portrayals, across 2.7K biography pages on English, Russian, and French Wikipedias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T20:40:49Z)
• Media Framing through the Lens of Event-Centric Narratives [5.991851254194096]
  We argue that to explain framing devices we have to look at the way narratives are constructed. We show that our framework can be used to analyze framing in U.S. news for two different domains: immigration and gun control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T05:21:42Z)
• A Multilingual Similarity Dataset for News Article Frame [14.977682986280998]
  We introduce an extended version of a large labeled news article dataset with 16,687 new labeled pairs. Our method frees the work of manual identification of frame classes in traditional news frame analysis studies. Overall we introduce the most extensive cross-lingual news article similarity dataset available to date with 26,555 labeled news article pairs across 10 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T01:01:04Z)
• Understanding Cross-Lingual Alignment -- A Survey [52.572071017877704]
  Cross-lingual alignment is the meaningful similarity of representations across languages in multilingual language models. We survey the literature of techniques to improve cross-lingual alignment, providing a taxonomy of methods and summarising insights from throughout the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T11:39:53Z)
• Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus Mainstream Media [3.3181276611945263]
  We investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites. We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T14:56:23Z)
• X-PARADE: Cross-Lingual Textual Entailment and Information Divergence across Paragraphs [55.80189506270598]
  X-PARADE is the first cross-lingual dataset of paragraph-level information divergences. Annotators label a paragraph in a target language at the span level and evaluate it with respect to a corresponding paragraph in a source language. Aligned paragraphs are sourced from Wikipedia pages in different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T04:34:55Z)
• Conflicts, Villains, Resolutions: Towards models of Narrative Media Framing [19.589945994234075]
  We revisit a widely used conceptualization of framing from the communication sciences which explicitly captures elements of narratives. We adapt an effective annotation paradigm that breaks a complex annotation task into a series of simpler binary questions. We explore automatic multi-label prediction of our frames with supervised and semi-supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T08:50:13Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Automated multilingual detection of Pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers and Telegram posts [5.886782001771578]
  The full-scale conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine generated an unprecedented amount of news articles and social media data. This study analyses how the media affected and mirrored public opinion during the first month of the war using news articles and Telegram news channels in Ukrainian, Russian, Romanian and English. We propose and compare two methods of multilingual automated pro-Kremlin propaganda identification, based on Transformers and linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T14:25:37Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• Fine-grained Iterative Attention Network for TemporalLanguage Localization in Videos [63.94898634140878]
  Temporal language localization in videos aims to ground one video segment in an untrimmed video based on a given sentence query. We propose a Fine-grained Iterative Attention Network (FIAN) that consists of an iterative attention module for bilateral query-video in-formation extraction. We evaluate the proposed method on three challenging public benchmarks: Ac-tivityNet Captions, TACoS, and Charades-STA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T04:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.