Evaluating Large Language Models on Spatial Tasks: A Multi-Task Benchmarking Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14438v3
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:59:05 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models on Spatial Tasks: A Multi-Task Benchmarking Study
• Authors: Liuchang Xu, Shuo Zhao, Qingming Lin, Luyao Chen, Qianqian Luo, Sensen Wu, Xinyue Ye, Hailin Feng, Zhenhong Du,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a novel multi-task spatial evaluation dataset. The dataset encompasses twelve distinct task types, including spatial understanding and path planning. The study highlights the impact of prompt strategies on model performance in specific tasks.
• Score: 4.80612909282198
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The advent of large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and others has underscored the importance of evaluating their diverse capabilities, ranging from natural language understanding to code generation. However, their performance on spatial tasks has not been comprehensively assessed. This study addresses this gap by introducing a novel multi-task spatial evaluation dataset, designed to systematically explore and compare the performance of several advanced models on spatial tasks. The dataset encompasses twelve distinct task types, including spatial understanding and path planning, each with verified, accurate answers. We evaluated multiple models, including OpenAI's gpt-3.5-turbo, gpt-4o, and ZhipuAI's glm-4, through a two-phase testing approach. Initially, we conducted zero-shot testing, followed by categorizing the dataset by difficulty and performing prompt tuning tests. Results indicate that gpt-4o achieved the highest overall accuracy in the first phase, with an average of 71.3%. Although moonshot-v1-8k slightly underperformed overall, it surpassed gpt-4o in place name recognition tasks. The study also highlights the impact of prompt strategies on model performance in specific tasks. For example, the Chain-of-Thought (COT) strategy increased gpt-4o's accuracy in path planning from 12.4% to 87.5%, while a one-shot strategy enhanced moonshot-v1-8k's accuracy in mapping tasks from 10.1% to 76.3%.

Related papers

• LLM4DS: Evaluating Large Language Models for Data Science Code Generation [0.0]
  This paper empirically assesses the performance of four leading AI assistants-Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4 Turbo), ChatGPT (o1-preview), Claude (3.5 Sonnet) and Perplexity Labs (Llama-3.1-70b-instruct) All models exceeded a 50% success rate, confirming their capability beyond random chance. ChatGPT demonstrated consistent performance across varying difficulty levels, while Claude's success rate fluctuated with task complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T18:43:26Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for SDG Mapping (Technical Report) [6.789534723913505]
  Large language models (LLMs) enable users to protect data privacy by eliminating the need to provide data to third parties. We compare the performance of various language models on the Sustainable Development Goal mapping task. According to the results of this study, LLaMA 2 and Gemma still have significant room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T03:05:02Z)
• Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees [119.57169648859707]
  We introduce Eurus, a suite of large language models (LLMs) optimized for reasoning. Eurus models achieve state-of-the-art results among open-source models on a diverse set of benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T16:25:30Z)
• Correctness Comparison of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, Claude-3, and Copilot for Spatial Tasks [0.0]
  This study conducts a zero-shot correctness evaluation for a set of 76 spatial tasks across seven task categories assigned to four prominent chatbots. The chatbots performed well on tasks related to spatial literacy, GIS theory, and interpretation of programming code and functions, but revealed weaknesses in mapping, code writing, and spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T18:43:26Z)
• Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoring [23.076596289069506]
  This study investigates the application of large language models (LLMs) in the automatic scoring of student-written responses to science assessments. We focused on overcoming the challenges of accessibility, technical complexity, and lack of explainability that have previously limited the use of artificial intelligence-based automatic scoring tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T21:22:43Z)
• Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling [58.381678612409]
  We propose a tool-augmented preference modeling approach, named Themis, to address limitations by empowering RMs with access to external environments. Our study delves into the integration of external tools into RMs, enabling them to interact with diverse external sources. In human evaluations, RLHF trained with Themis attains an average win rate of 32% when compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T09:47:40Z)
• Data-Efficient Finetuning Using Cross-Task Nearest Neighbors [75.07773863013001]
  We use unlabeled target-task examples to retrieve most similar labeled examples from a pool of multitask data augmented with prompts. Our approach of finetuning models on cross-task nearest neighbors is significantly more data-efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T00:53:04Z)
• A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [90.24921443175514]
  We focus on aspect-based sentiment analysis, which involves extracting aspect term, category, and predicting their corresponding polarities. We propose to reformulate the extraction and prediction tasks into the sequence generation task, using a generative language model with unidirectional attention. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (based on BERT) on average performance by a large margins in few-shot and full-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T18:31:53Z)
• Assessing Data Efficiency in Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing [54.87705549021248]
  We introduce a four-stage protocol which gives an approximate measure of how much in-domain "target" data a requires to achieve a certain quality bar. We apply our protocol in two real-world case studies illustrating its flexibility and applicability to practitioners in task-oriented semantic parsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T02:43:16Z)
• Language Models are Few-Shot Learners [61.36677350504291]
  We show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance. We train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T17:29:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.