RLCP: A Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection Method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16634v2
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:15:16 GMT
• Title: RLCP: A Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection Method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model
• Authors: Zhuan Shi, Jing Yan, Xiaoli Tang, Lingjuan Lyu, Boi Faltings,
• Abstract summary: We propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection(RLCP) method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model. Our approach minimizes the generation of copyright-infringing content while maintaining the quality of the model-generated dataset.
• Score: 42.77851688874563
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The increasing sophistication of text-to-image generative models has led to complex challenges in defining and enforcing copyright infringement criteria and protection. Existing methods, such as watermarking and dataset deduplication, fail to provide comprehensive solutions due to the lack of standardized metrics and the inherent complexity of addressing copyright infringement in diffusion models. To deal with these challenges, we propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Copyright Protection(RLCP) method for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model, which minimizes the generation of copyright-infringing content while maintaining the quality of the model-generated dataset. Our approach begins with the introduction of a novel copyright metric grounded in copyright law and court precedents on infringement. We then utilize the Denoising Diffusion Policy Optimization (DDPO) framework to guide the model through a multi-step decision-making process, optimizing it using a reward function that incorporates our proposed copyright metric. Additionally, we employ KL divergence as a regularization term to mitigate some failure modes and stabilize RL fine-tuning. Experiments conducted on 3 mixed datasets of copyright and non-copyright images demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces copyright infringement risk while maintaining image quality.

Related papers

• Copyright-Aware Incentive Scheme for Generative Art Models Using Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [42.63462923848866]
  We introduce a novel copyright metric grounded in copyright law and court precedents on infringement. We then employ the TRAK method to estimate the contribution of data holders. We design a hierarchical budget allocation method based on reinforcement learning to determine the budget for each round and the remuneration of the data holder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T13:29:43Z)
• Strong Copyright Protection for Language Models via Adaptive Model Fusion [15.48692649098646]
  Copyright-Protecting Fusion (CP-Fuse) is an algorithm that adaptively combines language models to minimize the reproduction of protected materials. Our results show that CP-Fuse significantly reduces the memorization of copyrighted content while maintaining high-quality text and code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T15:32:30Z)
• Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models [100.38129820325497]
  Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. This paper introduces the first evaluation of the feasibility and side effects of copyright takedowns for LMs. We examine several strategies, including adding system prompts, decoding-time filtering interventions, and unlearning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T18:09:46Z)
• ©Plug-in Authorization for Human Content Copyright Protection in Text-to-Image Model [71.47762442337948]
  State-of-the-art models create high-quality content without crediting original creators. We propose the copyright Plug-in Authorization framework, introducing three operations: addition, extraction, and combination. Extraction allows creators to reclaim copyright from infringing models, and combination enables users to merge different copyright plug-ins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:48:00Z)
• CPR: Retrieval Augmented Generation for Copyright Protection [101.15323302062562]
  We introduce CopyProtected generation with Retrieval (CPR), a new method for RAG with strong copyright protection guarantees. CPR allows to condition the output of diffusion models on a set of retrieved images. We prove that CPR satisfies Near Access Freeness (NAF) which bounds the amount of information an attacker may be able to extract from the generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T18:09:55Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• CopyScope: Model-level Copyright Infringement Quantification in the Diffusion Workflow [6.6282087165087304]
  Copyright infringement quantification is the primary and challenging step towards AI-generated image copyright traceability. We propose CopyScope, a new framework to quantify the infringement of AI-generated images from the model level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T13:08:09Z)
• FT-Shield: A Watermark Against Unauthorized Fine-tuning in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [64.89896692649589]
  We propose FT-Shield, a watermarking solution tailored for the fine-tuning of text-to-image diffusion models. FT-Shield addresses copyright protection challenges by designing new watermark generation and detection strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T19:50:08Z)
• Can Copyright be Reduced to Privacy? [23.639303165101385]
  We argue that while algorithmic stability may be perceived as a practical tool to detect copying, such copying does not necessarily constitute copyright infringement. If adopted as a standard for detecting an establishing copyright infringement, algorithmic stability may undermine the intended objectives of copyright law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T07:22:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.