Web Retrieval Agents for Evidence-Based Misinformation Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00009v2
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 19:13:41 GMT
• Title: Web Retrieval Agents for Evidence-Based Misinformation Detection
• Authors: Jacob-Junqi Tian, Hao Yu, Yury Orlovskiy, Tyler Vergho, Mauricio Rivera, Mayank Goel, Zachary Yang, Jean-Francois Godbout, Reihaneh Rabbany, Kellin Pelrine,
• Abstract summary: This paper develops an agent-based automated fact-checking approach for detecting misinformation. We demonstrate that combining a powerful LLM agent, which does not have access to the internet for searches, with an online web search agent yields better results than when each tool is used independently.
• Score: 12.807650005708911
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper develops an agent-based automated fact-checking approach for detecting misinformation. We demonstrate that combining a powerful LLM agent, which does not have access to the internet for searches, with an online web search agent yields better results than when each tool is used independently. Our approach is robust across multiple models, outperforming alternatives and increasing the macro F1 of misinformation detection by as much as 20 percent compared to LLMs without search. We also conduct extensive analyses on the sources our system leverages and their biases, decisions in the construction of the system like the search tool and the knowledge base, the type of evidence needed and its impact on the results, and other parts of the overall process. By combining strong performance with in-depth understanding, we hope to provide building blocks for future search-enabled misinformation mitigation systems.

Related papers

• The Extractive-Abstractive Spectrum: Uncovering Verifiability Trade-offs in LLM Generations [40.498553309980764]
  We study the interplay between verifiability and utility of information-sharing tools. We find that users prefer search engines over large language models for high-stakes queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T12:34:52Z)
• WeKnow-RAG: An Adaptive Approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Integrating Web Search and Knowledge Graphs [10.380692079063467]
  We propose WeKnow-RAG, which integrates Web search and Knowledge Graphs into a "Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)" system. First, the accuracy and reliability of LLM responses are improved by combining the structured representation of Knowledge Graphs with the flexibility of dense vector retrieval. Our approach effectively balances the efficiency and accuracy of information retrieval, thus improving the overall retrieval process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T15:19:16Z)
• Multimodal Misinformation Detection using Large Vision-Language Models [7.505532091249881]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks. Few approaches consider evidence retrieval as part of misinformation detection. We propose a novel re-ranking approach for multimodal evidence retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T13:57:11Z)
• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• Tree Search for Language Model Agents [69.43007235771383]
  We propose an inference-time search algorithm for LM agents to perform exploration and multi-step planning in interactive web environments. Our approach is a form of best-first tree search that operates within the actual environment space. It is the first tree search algorithm for LM agents that shows effectiveness on realistic web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:07:55Z)
• AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning [93.96463520716759]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools and knowledge to boost accuracy and hallucinations. Here, we introduce AvaTaR, a novel and automated framework that optimize an LLM agent to effectively leverage provided tools, improving performance on a given task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T04:20:02Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
  Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online. But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z)
• KwaiAgents: Generalized Information-seeking Agent System with Large Language Models [33.59597020276034]
  Humans excel in critical thinking, planning, reflection, and harnessing available tools to interact with and interpret the world. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) suggest that machines might also possess the aforementioned human-like capabilities. We introduce KwaiAgents, a generalized information-seeking agent system based on LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T08:11:11Z)
• Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents [25.89284695491093]
  This paper presents first steps in designing agents that learn meta-strategies for contextual query refinements. Agents are empowered with simple but effective search operators to exert fine-grained and transparent control over queries and search results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T13:11:57Z)
• AutoOD: Automated Outlier Detection via Curiosity-guided Search and Self-imitation Learning [72.99415402575886]
  Outlier detection is an important data mining task with numerous practical applications. We propose AutoOD, an automated outlier detection framework, which aims to search for an optimal neural network model. Experimental results on various real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that the deep model identified by AutoOD achieves the best performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T18:57:51Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.