SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01630v1
• Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 05:56:50 GMT
• Title: SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systems
• Authors: Wenxiao Zhang, Xiangrui Kong, Thomas Braunl, Jin B. Hong,
• Abstract summary: Embodied AI systems, including AI-powered robots that autonomously interact with the physical world, stand to be significantly advanced. Improper safety management can lead to failures in complex environments and make the system vulnerable to malicious command injections. We propose textitSafeEmbodAI, a safety framework for integrating mobile robots into embodied AI systems.
• Score: 5.055705635181593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Embodied AI systems, including AI-powered robots that autonomously interact with the physical world, stand to be significantly advanced by Large Language Models (LLMs), which enable robots to better understand complex language commands and perform advanced tasks with enhanced comprehension and adaptability, highlighting their potential to improve embodied AI capabilities. However, this advancement also introduces safety challenges, particularly in robotic navigation tasks. Improper safety management can lead to failures in complex environments and make the system vulnerable to malicious command injections, resulting in unsafe behaviours such as detours or collisions. To address these issues, we propose \textit{SafeEmbodAI}, a safety framework for integrating mobile robots into embodied AI systems. \textit{SafeEmbodAI} incorporates secure prompting, state management, and safety validation mechanisms to secure and assist LLMs in reasoning through multi-modal data and validating responses. We designed a metric to evaluate mission-oriented exploration, and evaluations in simulated environments demonstrate that our framework effectively mitigates threats from malicious commands and improves performance in various environment settings, ensuring the safety of embodied AI systems. Notably, In complex environments with mixed obstacles, our method demonstrates a significant performance increase of 267\% compared to the baseline in attack scenarios, highlighting its robustness in challenging conditions.

Related papers

• Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics [70.93622520400385]
  This paper systematically quantifies the robustness of VLA-based robotic systems. We introduce an untargeted position-aware attack objective that leverages spatial foundations to destabilize robotic actions. We also design an adversarial patch generation approach that places a small, colorful patch within the camera's view, effectively executing the attack in both digital and physical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T01:52:20Z)
• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions [76.42274173122328]
  We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examining AI agent safety within diverse and complex social interactions. We run 1840 simulations based on 92 scenarios across seven domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, education) Our experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs, both proprietary and open-sourced, exhibit safety risks in over 50% cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T19:47:21Z)
• Automated Cybersecurity Compliance and Threat Response Using AI, Blockchain & Smart Contracts [0.36832029288386137]
  We present a novel framework that integrates artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and smart contracts. We propose a system that automates the enforcement of security policies, reducing manual effort and potential human error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T20:38:14Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• A Study on Prompt Injection Attack Against LLM-Integrated Mobile Robotic Systems [4.71242457111104]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can process multi-modal prompts, enabling them to generate more context-aware responses. One of the primary concerns is the potential security risks associated with using LLMs in robotic navigation tasks. This study investigates the impact of prompt injections on mobile robot performance in LLM-integrated systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T02:48:22Z)
• Safety Control of Service Robots with LLMs and Embodied Knowledge Graphs [12.787160626087744]
  We propose a novel integration of Large Language Models with Embodied Robotic Control Prompts (ERCPs) and Embodied Knowledge Graphs (EKGs) ERCPs are designed as predefined instructions that ensure LLMs generate safe and precise responses. EKGs provide a comprehensive knowledge base ensuring that the actions of the robot are continuously aligned with safety protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T05:50:25Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Highlighting the Safety Concerns of Deploying LLMs/VLMs in Robotics [54.57914943017522]
  We highlight the critical issues of robustness and safety associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotics applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:01:45Z)
• Safe AI -- How is this Possible? [0.45687771576879593]
  Traditional safety engineering is coming to a turning point moving from deterministic, non-evolving systems operating in well-defined contexts to increasingly autonomous and learning-enabled AI systems acting in largely unpredictable operating contexts. We outline some of underlying challenges of safe AI and suggest a rigorous engineering framework for minimizing uncertainty, thereby increasing confidence, up to tolerable levels, in the safe behavior of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T16:32:35Z)
• TanksWorld: A Multi-Agent Environment for AI Safety Research [5.218815947097599]
  The ability to create artificial intelligence capable of performing complex tasks is rapidly outpacing our ability to ensure the safe and assured operation of AI-enabled systems. Recent simulation environments to illustrate AI safety risks are relatively simple or narrowly-focused on a particular issue. We introduce the AI safety TanksWorld as an environment for AI safety research with three essential aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T21:00:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.