Abstractive Text Summarization: State of the Art, Challenges, and Improvements
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02413v1
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 03:39:23 GMT
- Title: Abstractive Text Summarization: State of the Art, Challenges, and Improvements
- Authors: Hassan Shakil, Ahmad Farooq, Jugal Kalita,
- Abstract summary: This review takes a comprehensive approach encompassing state-of-the-art methods, challenges, solutions, comparisons, limitations and charts out future improvements.
The paper highlights challenges such as inadequate meaning representation, factual consistency, controllable text summarization, cross-lingual summarization, and evaluation metrics.
- Score: 6.349503549199403
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Specifically focusing on the landscape of abstractive text summarization, as opposed to extractive techniques, this survey presents a comprehensive overview, delving into state-of-the-art techniques, prevailing challenges, and prospective research directions. We categorize the techniques into traditional sequence-to-sequence models, pre-trained large language models, reinforcement learning, hierarchical methods, and multi-modal summarization. Unlike prior works that did not examine complexities, scalability and comparisons of techniques in detail, this review takes a comprehensive approach encompassing state-of-the-art methods, challenges, solutions, comparisons, limitations and charts out future improvements - providing researchers an extensive overview to advance abstractive summarization research. We provide vital comparison tables across techniques categorized - offering insights into model complexity, scalability and appropriate applications. The paper highlights challenges such as inadequate meaning representation, factual consistency, controllable text summarization, cross-lingual summarization, and evaluation metrics, among others. Solutions leveraging knowledge incorporation and other innovative strategies are proposed to address these challenges. The paper concludes by highlighting emerging research areas like factual inconsistency, domain-specific, cross-lingual, multilingual, and long-document summarization, as well as handling noisy data. Our objective is to provide researchers and practitioners with a structured overview of the domain, enabling them to better understand the current landscape and identify potential areas for further research and improvement.
Related papers
- Inference Optimizations for Large Language Models: Effects, Challenges, and Practical Considerations [0.0]
Large language models are ubiquitous in natural language processing because they can adapt to new tasks without retraining.
This literature review focuses on various techniques for reducing resource requirements and compressing large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T12:07:32Z) - CADS: A Systematic Literature Review on the Challenges of Abstractive Dialogue Summarization [7.234196390284036]
This article summarizes the research on Transformer-based abstractive summarization for English dialogues.
We cover the main challenges present in dialog summarization (i.e., language, structure, comprehension, speaker, salience, and factuality)
We find that while some challenges, like language, have seen considerable progress, others, such as comprehension, factuality, and salience, remain difficult and hold significant research opportunities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T17:30:22Z) - Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges [7.140449861888235]
This review categorizes works in text generation into five main tasks.
For each task, we review their relevant characteristics, sub-tasks, and specific challenges.
Our investigation shows nine prominent challenges common to all tasks and sub-tasks in recent text generation publications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T14:38:11Z) - Transformers and Language Models in Form Understanding: A Comprehensive
Review of Scanned Document Analysis [16.86139440201837]
We focus on the topic of form understanding in the context of scanned documents.
Our research methodology involves an in-depth analysis of popular documents and forms of understanding of trends over the last decade.
We showcase how transformers have propelled the field forward, revolutionizing form-understanding techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T22:22:02Z) - Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Survey [17.19337964440007]
There is currently a lack of comprehensive review that summarizes and compares the key techniques, metrics, datasets, models, and optimization approaches in this research domain.
This survey aims to address this gap by consolidating recent progress in these areas, offering a thorough survey and taxonomy of the datasets, metrics, and methodologies utilized.
It identifies strengths, limitations, unexplored territories, and gaps in the existing literature, while providing some insights for future research directions in this vital and rapidly evolving field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T23:59:01Z) - How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored.
Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges.
We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z) - Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook [151.49434496615427]
Vision systems to see and reason about the compositional nature of visual scenes are fundamental to understanding our world.
The models learned to bridge the gap between such modalities coupled with large-scale training data facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time.
The output of such models can be modified through human-provided prompts without retraining, e.g., segmenting a particular object by providing a bounding box, having interactive dialogues by asking questions about an image or video scene or manipulating the robot's behavior through language instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T17:59:18Z) - Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective
Study [117.08431221482638]
Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models.
Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms.
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z) - From Show to Tell: A Survey on Image Captioning [48.98681267347662]
Connecting Vision and Language plays an essential role in Generative Intelligence.
Research in image captioning has not reached a conclusive answer yet.
This work aims at providing a comprehensive overview and categorization of image captioning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T18:00:54Z) - Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and
Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot.
This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z) - Summarizing Text on Any Aspects: A Knowledge-Informed Weakly-Supervised
Approach [89.56158561087209]
We study summarizing on arbitrary aspects relevant to the document.
Due to the lack of supervision data, we develop a new weak supervision construction method and an aspect modeling scheme.
Experiments show our approach achieves performance boosts on summarizing both real and synthetic documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-14T03:20:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.