Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03793v2
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:14:36 GMT
• Title: Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures
• Authors: Ishaan Domkundwar, Mukunda N S, Ishaan Bhola,
• Abstract summary: This paper addresses the need for safety measures in AI systems that collaborate with human teams. We propose and evaluate three frameworks to enhance safety protocols in AI agent systems. We conclude that these frameworks can significantly strengthen the safety and security of AI agent systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents, specifically powered by large language models, have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in various applications where precision and efficacy are necessary. However, these agents come with inherent risks, including the potential for unsafe or biased actions, vulnerability to adversarial attacks, lack of transparency, and tendency to generate hallucinations. As AI agents become more prevalent in critical sectors of the industry, the implementation of effective safety protocols becomes increasingly important. This paper addresses the critical need for safety measures in AI systems, especially ones that collaborate with human teams. We propose and evaluate three frameworks to enhance safety protocols in AI agent systems: an LLM-powered input-output filter, a safety agent integrated within the system, and a hierarchical delegation-based system with embedded safety checks. Our methodology involves implementing these frameworks and testing them against a set of unsafe agentic use cases, providing a comprehensive evaluation of their effectiveness in mitigating risks associated with AI agent deployment. We conclude that these frameworks can significantly strengthen the safety and security of AI agent systems, minimizing potential harmful actions or outputs. Our work contributes to the ongoing effort to create safe and reliable AI applications, particularly in automated operations, and provides a foundation for developing robust guardrails to ensure the responsible use of AI agents in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Securing Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Threat Model and Mitigation Framework for Generative AI Agents [0.0]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive threat model tailored specifically for GenAI agents. Research work identifies 9 primary threats and organizes them across five key domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T16:29:24Z)
• A Framework for the Assurance of AI-Enabled Systems [0.0]
  This paper proposes a claims-based framework for risk management and assurance of AI systems. The paper's contributions are a framework process for AI assurance, a set of relevant definitions, and a discussion of important considerations in AI assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T13:44:01Z)
• Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems [1.2564343689544843]
  We develop simulations of AI agents collaborating on shared objectives to study security risks and trade-offs. We observe infectious malicious prompts - the multi-hop spreading of malicious instructions. Our findings illustrate potential trade-off between security and collaborative efficiency in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T14:00:35Z)
• AISafetyLab: A Comprehensive Framework for AI Safety Evaluation and Improvement [73.0700818105842]
  We introduce AISafetyLab, a unified framework and toolkit that integrates representative attack, defense, and evaluation methodologies for AI safety. AISafetyLab features an intuitive interface that enables developers to seamlessly apply various techniques. We conduct empirical studies on Vicuna, analyzing different attack and defense strategies to provide valuable insights into their comparative effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T02:11:52Z)
• Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI [90.74347101431474]
  Multi-agent systems of advanced AI pose novel and under-explored risks. We identify three key failure modes based on agents' incentives, as well as seven key risk factors. We highlight several important instances of each risk, as well as promising directions to help mitigate them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T23:03:21Z)
• Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents [72.92604341646691]
  We introduce Agent-SafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs) Agent-SafetyBench encompasses 349 interaction environments and 2,000 test cases, evaluating 8 categories of safety risks and covering 10 common failure modes frequently encountered in unsafe interactions. Our evaluation of 16 popular LLM agents reveals a concerning result: none of the agents achieves a safety score above 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:35:15Z)
• HAICOSYSTEM: An Ecosystem for Sandboxing Safety Risks in Human-AI Interactions [76.42274173122328]
  We present HAICOSYSTEM, a framework examining AI agent safety within diverse and complex social interactions. We run 1840 simulations based on 92 scenarios across seven domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, education) Our experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs, both proprietary and open-sourced, exhibit safety risks in over 50% cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T19:47:21Z)
• SafeEmbodAI: a Safety Framework for Mobile Robots in Embodied AI Systems [5.055705635181593]
  Embodied AI systems, including AI-powered robots that autonomously interact with the physical world, stand to be significantly advanced. Improper safety management can lead to failures in complex environments and make the system vulnerable to malicious command injections. We propose textitSafeEmbodAI, a safety framework for integrating mobile robots into embodied AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T05:56:50Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress? [59.96471873997733]
  We propose an empirical foundation for developing more meaningful safety metrics and define AI safety in a machine learning research context. We aim to provide a more rigorous framework for AI safety research, advancing the science of safety evaluations and clarifying the path towards measurable progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T17:59:24Z)
• Security of AI Agents [5.468745160706382]
  The study and development of AI agents have been boosted by large language models. In this paper, we identify and describe these vulnerabilities in detail from a system security perspective. We introduce defense mechanisms corresponding to each vulnerability with meticulous design and experiments to evaluate their viability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T23:16:45Z)
• AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathways [10.16690494897609]
  An Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent is a software entity that autonomously performs tasks or makes decisions based on pre-defined objectives and data inputs. This survey delves into the emerging security threats faced by AI agents, categorizing them into four critical knowledge gaps. By systematically reviewing these threats, this paper highlights both the progress made and the existing limitations in safeguarding AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T01:22:31Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• TrustAgent: Towards Safe and Trustworthy LLM-based Agents [50.33549510615024]
  This paper presents an Agent-Constitution-based agent framework, TrustAgent, with a focus on improving the LLM-based agent safety. The proposed framework ensures strict adherence to the Agent Constitution through three strategic components: pre-planning strategy which injects safety knowledge to the model before plan generation, in-planning strategy which enhances safety during plan generation, and post-planning strategy which ensures safety by post-planning inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T17:26:23Z)
• PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [70.84902425123406]
  Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence. However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks. We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors. Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.