Using Large Language Models to Generate Authentic Multi-agent Knowledge Work Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04286v2
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:32:54 GMT
• Title: Using Large Language Models to Generate Authentic Multi-agent Knowledge Work Datasets
• Authors: Desiree Heim, Christian Jilek, Adrian Ulges, Andreas Dengel,
• Abstract summary: Current publicly available knowledge work data collections lack diversity, extensive annotations, and contextual information about the users and their documents. This paper introduces our approach's design and vision and focuses on generating authentic knowledge work documents using Large Language Models. Our study involving human raters who assessed 53% of the generated and 74% of the real documents as realistic demonstrates the potential of our approach.
• Score: 5.465422605475246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Current publicly available knowledge work data collections lack diversity, extensive annotations, and contextual information about the users and their documents. These issues hinder objective and comparable data-driven evaluations and optimizations of knowledge work assistance systems. Due to the considerable resources needed to collect such data in real-life settings and the necessity of data censorship, collecting such a dataset appears nearly impossible. For this reason, we propose a configurable, multi-agent knowledge work dataset generator. This system simulates collaborative knowledge work among agents producing Large Language Model-generated documents and accompanying data traces. Additionally, the generator captures all background information, given in its configuration or created during the simulation process, in a knowledge graph. Finally, the resulting dataset can be utilized and shared without privacy or confidentiality concerns. This paper introduces our approach's design and vision and focuses on generating authentic knowledge work documents using Large Language Models. Our study involving human raters who assessed 53% of the generated and 74% of the real documents as realistic demonstrates the potential of our approach. Furthermore, we analyze the authenticity criteria mentioned in the participants' comments and elaborate on potential improvements for identified common issues.

Related papers

• Benchmarking pre-trained text embedding models in aligning built asset information [0.0]
  This study presents a comparative benchmark of state-of-the-art text embedding models to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning built asset information with domain-specific technical concepts. The results of our benchmarking across six proposed datasets, covering three tasks of clustering, retrieval, and reranking, highlight the need for future research on domain adaptation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T20:54:17Z)
• Query of CC: Unearthing Large Scale Domain-Specific Knowledge from Public Corpora [104.16648246740543]
  We propose an efficient data collection method based on large language models. The method bootstraps seed information through a large language model and retrieves related data from public corpora. It not only collects knowledge-related data for specific domains but unearths the data with potential reasoning procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T03:38:23Z)
• Capture the Flag: Uncovering Data Insights with Large Language Models [90.47038584812925]
  This study explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the discovery of insights in data. We propose a new evaluation methodology based on a "capture the flag" principle, measuring the ability of such models to recognize meaningful and pertinent information (flags) in a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T14:20:06Z)
• infoVerse: A Universal Framework for Dataset Characterization with Multidimensional Meta-information [68.76707843019886]
  infoVerse is a universal framework for dataset characterization. infoVerse captures multidimensional characteristics of datasets by incorporating various model-driven meta-information. In three real-world applications (data pruning, active learning, and data annotation), the samples chosen on infoVerse space consistently outperform strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T18:12:48Z)
• Controllable Data Generation by Deep Learning: A Review [22.582082771890974]
  controllable deep data generation is a promising research area, commonly known as controllable deep data generation. This article introduces exciting applications of controllable deep data generation, experimentally analyzes and compares existing works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T20:44:42Z)
• Layout-Aware Information Extraction for Document-Grounded Dialogue: Dataset, Method and Demonstration [75.47708732473586]
  We propose a layout-aware document-level Information Extraction dataset, LIE, to facilitate the study of extracting both structural and semantic knowledge from visually rich documents. LIE contains 62k annotations of three extraction tasks from 4,061 pages in product and official documents. Empirical results show that layout is critical for VRD-based extraction, and system demonstration also verifies that the extracted knowledge can help locate the answers that users care about.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T07:59:45Z)
• Documenting Data Production Processes: A Participatory Approach for Data Work [4.811554861191618]
  opacity of machine learning data is a significant threat to ethical data work and intelligible systems. Previous research has proposed standardized checklists to document datasets. This paper proposes a shift of perspective: from documenting datasets toward documenting data production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T15:39:02Z)
• Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI [0.0]
  We propose Data Cards for fostering transparent, purposeful and human-centered documentation of datasets. Data Cards are structured summaries of essential facts about various aspects of ML datasets needed by stakeholders. We present frameworks that ground Data Cards in real-world utility and human-centricity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-03T13:49:36Z)
• Algorithmic Fairness Datasets: the Story so Far [68.45921483094705]
  Data-driven algorithms are studied in diverse domains to support critical decisions, directly impacting people's well-being. A growing community of researchers has been investigating the equity of existing algorithms and proposing novel ones, advancing the understanding of risks and opportunities of automated decision-making for historically disadvantaged populations. Progress in fair Machine Learning hinges on data, which can be appropriately used only if adequately documented. Unfortunately, the algorithmic fairness community suffers from a collective data documentation debt caused by a lack of information on specific resources (opacity) and scatteredness of available information (sparsity)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T17:25:46Z)
• ENT-DESC: Entity Description Generation by Exploring Knowledge Graph [53.03778194567752]
  In practice, the input knowledge could be more than enough, since the output description may only cover the most significant knowledge. We introduce a large-scale and challenging dataset to facilitate the study of such a practical scenario in KG-to-text. We propose a multi-graph structure that is able to represent the original graph information more comprehensively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T14:16:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.