Vision-fused Attack: Advancing Aggressive and Stealthy Adversarial Text against Neural Machine Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05021v1
• Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 08:22:17 GMT
• Title: Vision-fused Attack: Advancing Aggressive and Stealthy Adversarial Text against Neural Machine Translation
• Authors: Yanni Xue, Haojie Hao, Jiakai Wang, Qiang Sheng, Renshuai Tao, Yu Liang, Pu Feng, Xianglong Liu,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel vision-fused attack (VFA) framework to acquire powerful adversarial text. For human imperceptibility, we propose the perception-retained adversarial text selection strategy to align the human text-reading mechanism.
• Score: 24.237246648082085
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While neural machine translation (NMT) models achieve success in our daily lives, they show vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Despite being harmful, these attacks also offer benefits for interpreting and enhancing NMT models, thus drawing increased research attention. However, existing studies on adversarial attacks are insufficient in both attacking ability and human imperceptibility due to their sole focus on the scope of language. This paper proposes a novel vision-fused attack (VFA) framework to acquire powerful adversarial text, i.e., more aggressive and stealthy. Regarding the attacking ability, we design the vision-merged solution space enhancement strategy to enlarge the limited semantic solution space, which enables us to search for adversarial candidates with higher attacking ability. For human imperceptibility, we propose the perception-retained adversarial text selection strategy to align the human text-reading mechanism. Thus, the finally selected adversarial text could be more deceptive. Extensive experiments on various models, including large language models (LLMs) like LLaMA and GPT-3.5, strongly support that VFA outperforms the comparisons by large margins (up to 81%/14% improvements on ASR/SSIM).

Related papers

• Chain of Attack: On the Robustness of Vision-Language Models Against Transfer-Based Adversarial Attacks [34.40254709148148]
  Pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) have showcased remarkable performance in image and natural language understanding. Their potential safety and robustness issues raise concerns that adversaries may evade the system and cause these models to generate toxic content through malicious attacks. We present Chain of Attack (CoA), which iteratively enhances the generation of adversarial examples based on the multi-modal semantic update.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T05:28:07Z)
• MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
  We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models. Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs. Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z)
• White-box Multimodal Jailbreaks Against Large Vision-Language Models [61.97578116584653]
  We propose a more comprehensive strategy that jointly attacks both text and image modalities to exploit a broader spectrum of vulnerability within Large Vision-Language Models. Our attack method begins by optimizing an adversarial image prefix from random noise to generate diverse harmful responses in the absence of text input. An adversarial text suffix is integrated and co-optimized with the adversarial image prefix to maximize the probability of eliciting affirmative responses to various harmful instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:13:30Z)
• Safeguarding Vision-Language Models Against Patched Visual Prompt Injectors [31.383591942592467]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) offer innovative ways to combine visual and textual data for enhanced understanding and interaction. Patch-based adversarial attack is considered the most realistic threat model in physical vision applications. We introduce SmoothVLM, a defense mechanism rooted in smoothing techniques, to protectVLMs from the threat of patched visual prompt injectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T04:19:19Z)
• Semantic Stealth: Adversarial Text Attacks on NLP Using Several Methods [0.0]
  A text adversarial attack involves the deliberate manipulation of input text to mislead the predictions of the model. BERT, BERT-on-BERT attack, and Fraud Bargain's Attack (FBA) are explored in this paper. PWWS emerges as the most potent adversary, consistently outperforming other methods across multiple evaluation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T02:55:01Z)
• Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Models [62.50622628004134]
  The vulnerability of deep neural networks to imperceptible adversarial perturbations has attracted widespread attention. Previous efforts achieved zero-shot adversarial robustness by aligning adversarial visual features with text supervision. We propose a few-shot adversarial prompt framework where adapting input sequences with limited data makes significant adversarial robustness improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T18:28:43Z)
• SA-Attack: Improving Adversarial Transferability of Vision-Language Pre-training Models via Self-Augmentation [56.622250514119294]
  In contrast to white-box adversarial attacks, transfer attacks are more reflective of real-world scenarios. We propose a self-augment-based transfer attack method, termed SA-Attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T09:08:50Z)
• Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models [109.75753454188705]
  Recent work shows that text moderations can produce jailbreaking prompts that bypass defenses. We look at three types of defenses: detection (perplexity based), input preprocessing (paraphrase and retokenization), and adversarial training. We find that the weakness of existing discretes for text, combined with the relatively high costs of optimization, makes standard adaptive attacks more challenging for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T17:59:44Z)
• How do humans perceive adversarial text? A reality check on the validity and naturalness of word-based adversarial attacks [4.297786261992324]
  adversarial attacks are malicious algorithms that imperceptibly modify input text to force models into making incorrect predictions. We surveyed 378 human participants about the perceptibility of text adversarial examples produced by state-of-the-art methods. Our results underline that existing text attacks are impractical in real-world scenarios where humans are involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T21:52:13Z)
• Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
  We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.