Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean 4
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05977v3
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 16:42:41 GMT
- Title: Mathematical Formalized Problem Solving and Theorem Proving in Different Fields in Lean 4
- Authors: Xichen Tang,
- Abstract summary: This paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal proof steps and complete formalized proofs.
The goal is to determine how AI can be leveraged to assist the mathematical formalization process and improve its performance.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Formalizing mathematical proofs using computerized verification languages like Lean 4 has the potential to significantly impact the field of mathematics, it offers prominent capabilities for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are largely limited to creating formalized versions of proofs from extensive online mathematical corpora, struggling to keep pace with the rapidly evolving nature of mathematics. To bridge the gap between traditional and computerized proof techniques, this paper explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate formal proof steps and complete formalized proofs. By converting natural language (NL) mathematical proofs into formalized versions, this work introduces the basic structure and tactics of the Lean 4 language. The goal is to determine how AI can be leveraged to assist the mathematical formalization process and improve its performance. Several examples are provided that demonstrate solving problems using both traditional and Lean 4-based approaches. Ultimately, this paper presents an explanation of the foundations of Lean 4 and comparative analyses of the mathematical formalization process using traditional and AI-augmented techniques. The findings indicate that AI- powered tools have significant potential to accelerate and enhance the formalization of mathematical proofs, paving the way for more efficient and reliable theorem-proving for AI for Math in the future.
Related papers
- LemmaHead: RAG Assisted Proof Generation Using Large Language Models [0.0]
We develop LemmaHead, a knowledge base that supplements queries to the model with relevant mathematical context.
To measure our model's performance in mathematical reasoning, our testing paradigm focuses on the task of automated theorem proving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-27T05:46:06Z) - Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AI [60.26950681543385]
We advocate for formal mathematical reasoning and argue that it is indispensable for advancing AI4Math to the next level.
We summarize existing progress, discuss open challenges, and envision critical milestones to measure future success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T17:19:24Z) - LeanAgent: Lifelong Learning for Formal Theorem Proving [85.39415834798385]
We present LeanAgent, a novel lifelong learning framework for formal theorem proving.
LeanAgent continuously generalizes to and improves on ever-expanding mathematical knowledge.
It successfully proves 155 theorems previously unproved formally by humans across 23 diverse Lean repositories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:11:24Z) - Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving [53.923617816215774]
We present Lean-STaR, a framework for training language models to produce informal thoughts prior to each step of a proof.
Lean-STaR achieves state-of-the-art results on the miniF2F-test benchmark within the Lean theorem proving environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-14T01:43:07Z) - Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometry [74.72212706513318]
We introduce a neuro-symbolic framework for autoformalizing Euclidean geometry.
One challenge is that informal proofs rely on diagrams, leaving gaps in texts that are hard to formalize.
We provide automatic semantic evaluation for autoformalized theorem statements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T14:35:10Z) - EvoGPT-f: An Evolutionary GPT Framework for Benchmarking Formal Math
Languages [0.0]
Formal mathematics is the discipline of translating mathematics into a programming language.
This paper introduces an evolutionary framework for the first systematic quantitative analysis of the differential machine learnability of five formal math corpora.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T19:10:11Z) - A New Approach Towards Autoformalization [7.275550401145199]
Autoformalization is the task of translating natural language mathematics into a formal language that can be verified by a program.
Research paper mathematics requires large amounts of background and context.
We propose an avenue towards tackling autoformalization for research-level mathematics, by breaking the task into easier and more approachable subtasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T00:50:24Z) - NaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural Language [132.99913141409968]
We develop NaturalProofs, a multi-domain corpus of mathematical statements and their proofs.
NaturalProofs unifies broad coverage, deep coverage, and low-resource mathematical sources.
We benchmark strong neural methods on mathematical reference retrieval and generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-24T03:14:48Z) - Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Proving [94.01137612934842]
This work is motivated by the possibility that a major limitation of automated theorem provers compared to humans might be addressable via generation from language models.
We present an automated prover and proof assistant, GPT-f, for the Metamath formalization language, and analyze its performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-07T19:50:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.