Deep Learning Under Siege: Identifying Security Vulnerabilities and Risk Mitigation Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09517v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:54:12 GMT
• Title: Deep Learning Under Siege: Identifying Security Vulnerabilities and Risk Mitigation Strategies
• Authors: Jamal Al-Karaki, Muhammad Al-Zafar Khan, Mostafa Mohamad, Dababrata Chowdhury,
• Abstract summary: We present the security challenges associated with the current Deep Learning models deployed into production and anticipate the challenges of future DL technologies. We propose risk mitigation techniques to inhibit these challenges and provide metrical evaluations to measure the effectiveness of these metrics.
• Score: 0.5062312533373299
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rise in the wholesale adoption of Deep Learning (DL) models in nearly all aspects of society, a unique set of challenges is imposed. Primarily centered around the architectures of these models, these risks pose a significant challenge, and addressing these challenges is key to their successful implementation and usage in the future. In this research, we present the security challenges associated with the current DL models deployed into production, as well as anticipate the challenges of future DL technologies based on the advancements in computing, AI, and hardware technologies. In addition, we propose risk mitigation techniques to inhibit these challenges and provide metrical evaluations to measure the effectiveness of these metrics.

Related papers

• A Formal Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Emergent Security Risks in Generative AI Models: Bridging Theory and Dynamic Risk Mitigation [0.3413711585591077]
  As generative AI systems, including large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, advance rapidly, their growing adoption has led to new and complex security risks. This paper introduces a novel formal framework for categorizing and mitigating these emergent security risks. We identify previously under-explored risks, including latent space exploitation, multi-modal cross-attack vectors, and feedback-loop-induced model degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T02:51:32Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Grounding and Evaluation for Large Language Models: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned (Survey) [16.39412083123155]
  It is essential to evaluate and monitor AI systems for robustness, bias, security, interpretability, and other responsible AI dimensions. We focus on large language models (LLMs) and other generative AI models, which present additional challenges such as hallucinations, harmful and manipulative content, and copyright infringement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T01:23:10Z)
• Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models [171.01569693871676]
  This work identifies 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs) Based on the identified challenges, we pose $200+$ concrete research questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T16:58:28Z)
• On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI [135.2754367149689]
  We argue that current large-scale generative AI models do not sufficiently address several fundamental issues that hinder their widespread adoption across domains. In this work, we aim to identify key unresolved challenges in modern generative AI paradigms that should be tackled to further enhance their capabilities, versatility, and reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:19:33Z)
• Causal Reasoning: Charting a Revolutionary Course for Next-Generation AI-Native Wireless Networks [63.246437631458356]
  Next-generation wireless networks (e.g., 6G) will be artificial intelligence (AI)-native. This article introduces a novel framework for building AI-native wireless networks; grounded in the emerging field of causal reasoning. We highlight several wireless networking challenges that can be addressed by causal discovery and representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T00:05:39Z)
• Adversarial Nibbler: A Data-Centric Challenge for Improving the Safety of Text-to-Image Models [6.475537049815622]
  Adversarial Nibbler is a data-centric challenge, part of the DataPerf challenge suite, organized and supported by Kaggle and MLCommons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:02:40Z)
• Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements [76.80453043969209]
  This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models. We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models. We explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T09:32:55Z)
• Holistic Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning Models [91.34155889052786]
  Adversarial robustness studies the worst-case performance of a machine learning model to ensure safety and reliability. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of research topics and foundational principles of research methods for adversarial robustness of deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T05:30:27Z)
• Machine Learning (In) Security: A Stream of Problems [17.471312325933244]
  We identify, detail, and discuss the main challenges in the correct application of Machine Learning techniques to cybersecurity data. We evaluate how concept drift, evolution, delayed labels, and adversarial ML impact the existing solutions. We present how existing solutions may fail under certain circumstances, and propose mitigations to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T03:40:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.