Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09270v3
• Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 06:39:19 GMT
• Title: Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements
• Authors: Jiawen Deng, Jiale Cheng, Hao Sun, Zhexin Zhang, Minlie Huang
• Abstract summary: This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models. We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models. We explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment.
• Score: 76.80453043969209
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As generative large model capabilities advance, safety concerns become more pronounced in their outputs. To ensure the sustainable growth of the AI ecosystem, it's imperative to undertake a holistic evaluation and refinement of associated safety risks. This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models, delineating the landscape of safety risks as well as safety evaluation and improvement methods. We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models, encompassing preference-based testing, adversarial attack approaches, issues detection, and other advanced evaluation methods. Additionally, we explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment, highlighting cutting-edge safety approaches for each stage in building large models. Finally, we discuss the core challenges in advancing towards more responsible AI, including the interpretability of safety mechanisms, ongoing safety issues, and robustness against malicious attacks. Through this survey, we aim to provide clear technical guidance for safety researchers and encourage further study on the safety of large models.

Related papers

• Building Trust: Foundations of Security, Safety and Transparency in AI [0.23301643766310373]
  We review the current security and safety scenarios while highlighting challenges such as tracking issues, remediation, and the apparent absence of AI model lifecycle and ownership processes. This paper aims to provide some of the foundational pieces for more standardized security, safety, and transparency in the development and operation of AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T06:55:57Z)
• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress? [59.96471873997733]
  We propose an empirical foundation for developing more meaningful safety metrics and define AI safety in a machine learning research context. We aim to provide a more rigorous framework for AI safety research, advancing the science of safety evaluations and clarifying the path towards measurable progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T17:59:24Z)
• Sok: Comprehensive Security Overview, Challenges, and Future Directions of Voice-Controlled Systems [10.86045604075024]
  The integration of Voice Control Systems into smart devices accentuates the importance of their security. Current research has uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in VCS, presenting significant risks to user privacy and security. This study introduces a hierarchical model structure for VCS, providing a novel lens for categorizing and analyzing existing literature in a systematic manner. We classify attacks based on their technical principles and thoroughly evaluate various attributes, such as their methods, targets, vectors, and behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T12:18:46Z)
• The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness [56.174255970895466]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications. This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:37:06Z)
• Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis [63.532413807686524]
  This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL) We propose a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T16:09:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.