AI Literacy for All: Adjustable Interdisciplinary Socio-technical Curriculum
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10552v1
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 13:13:53 GMT
- Title: AI Literacy for All: Adjustable Interdisciplinary Socio-technical Curriculum
- Authors: Sri Yash Tadimalla, Mary Lou Maher,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a curriculum, "AI Literacy for All," to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of AI.
The paper presents four pillars of AI literacy: understanding the scope and technical dimensions of AI, learning how to interact with Gen-AI in an informed and responsible way, the socio-technical issues of ethical and responsible AI, and the social and future implications of AI.
- Score: 0.8879149917735942
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a curriculum, "AI Literacy for All," to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of AI, its socio-technical implications, and its practical applications for all levels of education. With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), there is a need for AI literacy that goes beyond the traditional AI education curriculum. AI literacy has been conceptualized in various ways, including public literacy, competency building for designers, conceptual understanding of AI concepts, and domain-specific upskilling. Most of these conceptualizations were established before the public release of Generative AI (Gen-AI) tools like ChatGPT. AI education has focused on the principles and applications of AI through a technical lens that emphasizes the mastery of AI principles, the mathematical foundations underlying these technologies, and the programming and mathematical skills necessary to implement AI solutions. In AI Literacy for All, we emphasize a balanced curriculum that includes technical and non-technical learning outcomes to enable a conceptual understanding and critical evaluation of AI technologies in an interdisciplinary socio-technical context. The paper presents four pillars of AI literacy: understanding the scope and technical dimensions of AI, learning how to interact with Gen-AI in an informed and responsible way, the socio-technical issues of ethical and responsible AI, and the social and future implications of AI. While it is important to include all learning outcomes for AI education in a Computer Science major, the learning outcomes can be adjusted for other learning contexts, including, non-CS majors, high school summer camps, the adult workforce, and the public. This paper advocates for a shift in AI literacy education to offer a more interdisciplinary socio-technical approach as a pathway to broaden participation in AI.
Related papers
- Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.
The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming.
A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTube [11.209406323898019]
We analyze the 20 most watched introductory AI courses on YouTube.
Introductory AI courses do not meaningfully engage with ethical or societal challenges of AI.
We recommend that introductory AI courses should highlight ethical challenges of AI to present a more balanced perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T01:48:42Z) - Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills.
This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI.
Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z) - Transdisciplinary AI Education: The Confluence of Curricular and
Community Needs in the Instruction of Artificial Intelligence [0.7133676002283578]
We examine the current state of AI in education and explore the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating this technology into the classroom.
This paper delves into the AI program currently in development for Neom Community School and the larger Education, Research, and Innovation Sector in Neom, Saudi Arabia s new megacity under development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T17:26:27Z) - What Students Can Learn About Artificial Intelligence -- Recommendations
for K-12 Computing Education [0.0]
Technological advances in the context of digital transformation are the basis for rapid developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI)
An increasing number of computer science curricula are being extended to include the topic of AI.
This paper presents a curriculum of learning objectives that addresses digital literacy and the societal perspective in particular.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T20:39:43Z) - Competency Model Approach to AI Literacy: Research-based Path from
Initial Framework to Model [0.0]
Research on AI Literacy could lead to an effective and practical platform for developing these skills.
We propose and advocate for a pathway for developing AI Literacy as a pragmatic and useful tool for AI education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-12T15:42:32Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z) - Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of
AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains.
Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.