Linguini: A benchmark for language-agnostic linguistic reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12126v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:51:02 GMT
- Title: Linguini: A benchmark for language-agnostic linguistic reasoning
- Authors: Eduardo Sánchez, Belen Alastruey, Christophe Ropers, Pontus Stenetorp, Mikel Artetxe, Marta R. Costa-jussà ,
- Abstract summary: We propose a new benchmark to measure a language model's linguistic reasoning skills without relying on pre-existing language-specific knowledge.
The test covers 894 questions grouped in 160 problems across 75 (mostly) extremely low-resource languages.
We find that while all analyzed models rank below 25% accuracy, there is a significant gap between open and closed models.
- Score: 37.73108306825993
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We propose a new benchmark to measure a language model's linguistic reasoning skills without relying on pre-existing language-specific knowledge. The test covers 894 questions grouped in 160 problems across 75 (mostly) extremely low-resource languages, extracted from the International Linguistic Olympiad corpus. To attain high accuracy on this benchmark, models don't need previous knowledge of the tested language, as all the information needed to solve the linguistic puzzle is presented in the context. We find that, while all analyzed models rank below 25% accuracy, there is a significant gap between open and closed models, with the best-performing proprietary model at 24.05% and the best-performing open model at 8.84%.
Related papers
- LINGOLY: A Benchmark of Olympiad-Level Linguistic Reasoning Puzzles in Low-Resource and Extinct Languages [8.754506364968394]
The LingOly benchmark is a novel benchmark for advanced reasoning abilities in large language models.
We evaluate capabilities for in-context identification and generalisation of linguistic patterns in very low-resource or extinct languages.
We assess performance with both direct accuracy and comparison to a no-context baseline to penalise memorisation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T11:50:29Z) - IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models [18.260317326787035]
This paper introduces IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 16 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages.
We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and four proprietary language models.
We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Aya-101 only at 58% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-05T15:23:08Z) - SERENGETI: Massively Multilingual Language Models for Africa [5.945320097465418]
We develop SERENGETI, a massively multilingual language model that covers 517 African languages and language varieties.
We evaluate our novel models on eight natural language understanding tasks across 20 datasets, comparing to 4 mPLMs that cover 4-23 African languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T05:54:14Z) - No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation [69.28110770760506]
We create datasets and models aimed at narrowing the performance gap between low and high-resource languages.
We propose multiple architectural and training improvements to counteract overfitting while training on thousands of tasks.
Our model achieves an improvement of 44% BLEU relative to the previous state-of-the-art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-11T07:33:36Z) - Language Identification for Austronesian Languages [0.0]
This paper provides language identification models for low- and under-resourced languages in the Pacific region.
We combine 29 Austronesian languages with 171 non-Austronesian languages to create an evaluation set.
Further experiments adapt these language identification models for code-switching detection, achieving high accuracy across all 29 languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T08:08:18Z) - Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models [66.49496434282564]
We train multilingual autoregressive language models on a balanced corpus covering a diverse set of languages.
Our largest model sets new state of the art in few-shot learning in more than 20 representative languages.
We present a detailed analysis of where the model succeeds and fails, showing in particular that it enables cross-lingual in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T16:52:35Z) - Language Models are Few-shot Multilingual Learners [66.11011385895195]
We evaluate the multilingual skills of the GPT and T5 models in conducting multi-class classification on non-English languages.
We show that, given a few English examples as context, pre-trained language models can predict not only English test samples but also non-English ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T03:08:22Z) - AmericasNLI: Evaluating Zero-shot Natural Language Understanding of
Pretrained Multilingual Models in Truly Low-resource Languages [75.08199398141744]
We present AmericasNLI, an extension of XNLI (Conneau et al.), to 10 indigenous languages of the Americas.
We conduct experiments with XLM-R, testing multiple zero-shot and translation-based approaches.
We find that XLM-R's zero-shot performance is poor for all 10 languages, with an average performance of 38.62%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T05:32:28Z) - Learning to Learn Morphological Inflection for Resource-Poor Languages [105.11499402984482]
We propose to cast the task of morphological inflection - mapping a lemma to an indicated inflected form - for resource-poor languages as a meta-learning problem.
Treating each language as a separate task, we use data from high-resource source languages to learn a set of model parameters.
Experiments with two model architectures on 29 target languages from 3 families show that our suggested approach outperforms all baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T05:13:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.