ARTICLE: Annotator Reliability Through In-Context Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12218v2
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 03:46:07 GMT
• Title: ARTICLE: Annotator Reliability Through In-Context Learning
• Authors: Sujan Dutta, Deepak Pandita, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Marcos Zampieri, Christopher M. Homan, Ashiqur R. KhudaBukhsh,
• Abstract summary: We propose texttARTICLE, an in-context learning framework to estimate annotation quality through self-consistency. Our findings indicate that texttARTICLE can be used as a robust method for identifying reliable annotators, hence improving data quality.
• Score: 18.818071256242327
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring annotator quality in training and evaluation data is a key piece of machine learning in NLP. Tasks such as sentiment analysis and offensive speech detection are intrinsically subjective, creating a challenging scenario for traditional quality assessment approaches because it is hard to distinguish disagreement due to poor work from that due to differences of opinions between sincere annotators. With the goal of increasing diverse perspectives in annotation while ensuring consistency, we propose \texttt{ARTICLE}, an in-context learning (ICL) framework to estimate annotation quality through self-consistency. We evaluate this framework on two offensive speech datasets using multiple LLMs and compare its performance with traditional methods. Our findings indicate that \texttt{ARTICLE} can be used as a robust method for identifying reliable annotators, hence improving data quality.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Vision Language Model Unlearning via Fictitious Facial Identity Dataset [94.13848736705575]
  We introduce Facial Identity Unlearning Benchmark (FIUBench), a novel VLM unlearning benchmark designed to robustly evaluate the effectiveness of unlearning algorithms. We apply a two-stage evaluation pipeline that is designed to precisely control the sources of information and their exposure levels. Through the evaluation of four baseline VLM unlearning algorithms within FIUBench, we find that all methods remain limited in their unlearning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T23:26:10Z)
• Multi-Facet Counterfactual Learning for Content Quality Evaluation [48.73583736357489]
  We propose a framework for efficiently constructing evaluators that perceive multiple facets of content quality evaluation. We leverage a joint training strategy based on contrastive learning and supervised learning to enable the evaluator to distinguish between different quality facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T08:04:10Z)
• Con-ReCall: Detecting Pre-training Data in LLMs via Contrastive Decoding [118.75567341513897]
  Existing methods typically analyze target text in isolation or solely with non-member contexts. We propose Con-ReCall, a novel approach that leverages the asymmetric distributional shifts induced by member and non-member contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:10:38Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• DCR-Consistency: Divide-Conquer-Reasoning for Consistency Evaluation and Improvement of Large Language Models [4.953092503184905]
  This work proposes DCR, an automated framework for evaluating and improving the consistency of Large Language Models (LLMs) generated texts. We introduce an automatic metric converter (AMC) that translates the output from DCE into an interpretable numeric score. Our approach also substantially reduces nearly 90% of output inconsistencies, showing promise for effective hallucination mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T08:34:16Z)
• The Meta-Evaluation Problem in Explainable AI: Identifying Reliable Estimators with MetaQuantus [10.135749005469686]
  One of the unsolved challenges in the field of Explainable AI (XAI) is determining how to most reliably estimate the quality of an explanation method. We address this issue through a meta-evaluation of different quality estimators in XAI. Our novel framework, MetaQuantus, analyses two complementary performance characteristics of a quality estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:59:02Z)
• Using Representation Expressiveness and Learnability to Evaluate Self-Supervised Learning Methods [61.49061000562676]
  We introduce Cluster Learnability (CL) to assess learnability. CL is measured in terms of the performance of a KNN trained to predict labels obtained by clustering the representations with K-means. We find that CL better correlates with in-distribution model performance than other competing recent evaluation schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T19:05:13Z)
• Utterance Rewriting with Contrastive Learning in Multi-turn Dialogue [22.103162555263143]
  We introduce contrastive learning and multi-task learning to jointly model the problem. Our proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance on several public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-22T10:13:27Z)
• Semantics-Preserved Distortion for Personal Privacy Protection in Information Management [65.08939490413037]
  This paper suggests a linguistically-grounded approach to distort texts while maintaining semantic integrity. We present two distinct frameworks for semantic-preserving distortion: a generative approach and a substitutive approach. We also explore privacy protection in a specific medical information management scenario, showing our method effectively limits sensitive data memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-04T04:01:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.