Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12411v1
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:20:06 GMT
- Title: Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation
- Authors: Chen Liang, Zhifan Feng, Zihe Liu, Wenbin Jiang, Jinan Xu, Yufeng Chen, Yong Wang,
- Abstract summary: We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework.
At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence.
We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
- Score: 49.27250832754313
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Chain-of-thought prompting significantly boosts the reasoning ability of large language models but still faces three issues: hallucination problem, restricted interpretability, and uncontrollable generation. To address these challenges, we present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework, which can solve complex problems in an agent-style manner by multiple round LLM generation. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. In addition, we integrate the step's index into the reasoning process to form a graph structure for complex inference logic. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our method on six common benchmarks. Results exhibit that our method brings in substantial improvements over current competitive approaches.
Related papers
- Enhancing Multi-Agent Consensus through Third-Party LLM Integration: Analyzing Uncertainty and Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models [1.4582633500696451]
Large Language Models (LLMs) still face challenges when dealing with complex reasoning tasks.
This paper proposes a new method that integrates different LLMs to expand the knowledge boundary.
Experiments on arithmetic datasets have validated the effectiveness of the method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T08:42:33Z) - From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.
We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z) - CoT Rerailer: Enhancing the Reliability of Large Language Models in Complex Reasoning Tasks through Error Detection and Correction [9.44858963874474]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) complex reasoning abilities.
We propose the CoT Rerailer to address these challenges, employing self-consistency and multi-agent debate systems.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across diverse question-answering datasets in various knowledge domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T21:20:17Z) - Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks.
We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z) - Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training.
Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z) - Adaptive In-conversation Team Building for Language Model Agents [33.03550687362213]
Leveraging multiple large language model (LLM) agents has shown to be a promising approach for tackling complex tasks.
Our new adaptive team-building paradigm offers a flexible solution, realized through a novel agent design named Captain Agent.
A comprehensive evaluation across six real-world scenarios demonstrates that Captain Agent significantly outperforms existing multi-agent methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T18:08:37Z) - Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities.
When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z) - On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games
to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees.
We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents.
We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z) - Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models [81.01397924280612]
Large language models (LLMs) can achieve highly effective performance on various reasoning tasks by incorporating step-by-step chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting as demonstrations.
We introduce Iter-CoT (Iterative bootstrapping in Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting), an iterative bootstrapping approach for selecting exemplars and generating reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-23T13:54:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.