Unlocking Memorization in Large Language Models with Dynamic Soft Prompting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13853v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:56:32 GMT
• Title: Unlocking Memorization in Large Language Models with Dynamic Soft Prompting
• Authors: Zhepeng Wang, Runxue Bao, Yawen Wu, Jackson Taylor, Cao Xiao, Feng Zheng, Weiwen Jiang, Shangqian Gao, Yanfu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as summarization, question answering, and translation. LLMs pose significant security risks due to their tendency to memorize training data, leading to potential privacy breaches and copyright infringement. We propose a novel method for estimating LLM memorization using dynamic, prefix-dependent soft prompts.
• Score: 66.54460367290146
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Pretrained large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as summarization, question answering, and translation. However, LLMs pose significant security risks due to their tendency to memorize training data, leading to potential privacy breaches and copyright infringement. Accurate measurement of this memorization is essential to evaluate and mitigate these potential risks. However, previous attempts to characterize memorization are constrained by either using prefixes only or by prepending a constant soft prompt to the prefixes, which cannot react to changes in input. To address this challenge, we propose a novel method for estimating LLM memorization using dynamic, prefix-dependent soft prompts. Our approach involves training a transformer-based generator to produce soft prompts that adapt to changes in input, thereby enabling more accurate extraction of memorized data. Our method not only addresses the limitations of previous methods but also demonstrates superior performance in diverse experimental settings compared to state-of-the-art techniques. In particular, our method can achieve the maximum relative improvement of 112.75% and 32.26% over the vanilla baseline in terms of discoverable memorization rate for the text generation task and code generation task respectively.

Related papers

• Mitigating Memorization In Language Models [37.899013074095336]
  Language models (LMs) can "memorize" information, encode training data in their weights in such a way that inference-time queries can lead to verbatim regurgitation of that data. We introduce TinyMem, a suite of small, computationally-efficient LMs for the rapid development and evaluation of memorization-mitigation methods. We show, in particular, that our proposed unlearning method BalancedSubnet outperforms other mitigation methods at removing memorized information while preserving performance on target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T02:53:51Z)
• Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memorization in Diffusion Models [49.438362005962375]
  We introduce a straightforward yet effective method for detecting memorized prompts by inspecting the magnitude of text-conditional predictions. Our proposed method seamlessly integrates without disrupting sampling algorithms, and delivers high accuracy even at the first generation step. Building on our detection strategy, we unveil an explainable approach that shows the contribution of individual words or tokens to memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T16:13:29Z)
• Accelerating Large Language Model Inference with Self-Supervised Early Exits [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel technique for accelerating inference in large, pre-trained language models (LLMs) We propose the integration of early exit ''heads'' atop existing transformer layers, which facilitate conditional terminations based on a confidence metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T07:58:28Z)
• Generalization v.s. Memorization: Tracing Language Models' Capabilities Back to Pretraining Data [76.90128359866462]
  We introduce an extended concept of memorization, distributional memorization, which measures the correlation between the output probabilities and the pretraining data frequency. This study demonstrates that memorization plays a larger role in simpler, knowledge-intensive tasks, while generalization is the key for harder, reasoning-based tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:24:40Z)
• Beyond Memorization: The Challenge of Random Memory Access in Language Models [56.525691003233554]
  We investigate whether a generative Language Model (LM) is able to access its memory sequentially or randomly. We find that techniques including recitation and permutation improve the random memory access capability of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T16:42:44Z)
• Quantifying and Analyzing Entity-level Memorization in Large Language Models [4.59914731734176]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been proven capable of memorizing their training data. Privacy risks arising from memorization have attracted increasing attention. We propose a fine-grained, entity-level definition to quantify memorization with conditions and metrics closer to real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T03:06:47Z)
• Instruction Position Matters in Sequence Generation with Large Language Models [67.87516654892343]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of performing conditional sequence generation tasks, such as translation or summarization. We propose enhancing the instruction-following capability of LLMs by shifting the position of task instructions after the input sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T12:36:57Z)
• Mitigating Approximate Memorization in Language Models via Dissimilarity Learned Policy [0.0]
  Large Language models (LLMs) are trained on large amounts of data. LLMs showed to memorize parts of the training data and emit those data verbatim when an adversary prompts appropriately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T15:53:28Z)
• Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy [91.98116450958331]
  We argue that verbatim memorization definitions are too restrictive and fail to capture more subtle forms of memorization. Specifically, we design and implement an efficient defense that perfectly prevents all verbatim memorization. We conclude by discussing potential alternative definitions and why defining memorization is a difficult yet crucial open question for neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T17:57:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.