Investigating the Impact of Hard Samples on Accuracy Reveals In-class Data Imbalance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14401v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:38:14 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Impact of Hard Samples on Accuracy Reveals In-class Data Imbalance
• Authors: Pawel Pukowski, Haiping Lu,
• Abstract summary: In the AutoML domain, test accuracy is heralded as the quintessential metric for evaluating model efficacy. However, the reliability of test accuracy as the primary performance metric has been called into question. The distribution of hard samples between training and test sets affects the difficulty levels of those sets. We propose a benchmarking procedure for comparing hard sample identification methods.
• Score: 4.291589126905706
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the AutoML domain, test accuracy is heralded as the quintessential metric for evaluating model efficacy, underpinning a wide array of applications from neural architecture search to hyperparameter optimization. However, the reliability of test accuracy as the primary performance metric has been called into question, notably through research highlighting how label noise can obscure the true ranking of state-of-the-art models. We venture beyond, along another perspective where the existence of hard samples within datasets casts further doubt on the generalization capabilities inferred from test accuracy alone. Our investigation reveals that the distribution of hard samples between training and test sets affects the difficulty levels of those sets, thereby influencing the perceived generalization capability of models. We unveil two distinct generalization pathways-toward easy and hard samples-highlighting the complexity of achieving balanced model evaluation. Finally, we propose a benchmarking procedure for comparing hard sample identification methods, facilitating the advancement of more nuanced approaches in this area. Our primary goal is not to propose a definitive solution but to highlight the limitations of relying primarily on test accuracy as an evaluation metric, even when working with balanced datasets, by introducing the in-class data imbalance problem. By doing so, we aim to stimulate a critical discussion within the research community and open new avenues for research that consider a broader spectrum of model evaluation criteria. The anonymous code is available at https://github.com/PawPuk/CurvBIM blueunder the GPL-3.0 license.

Related papers

• Is Difficulty Calibration All We Need? Towards More Practical Membership Inference Attacks [16.064233621959538]
  We propose a query-efficient and computation-efficient MIA that directly textbfRe-levertextbfAges the original membershitextbfP scores to mtextbfItigate the errors in textbfDifficulty calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T11:59:42Z)
• Foster Adaptivity and Balance in Learning with Noisy Labels [26.309508654960354]
  We propose a novel approach named textbfSED to deal with label noise in a textbfSelf-adaptivtextbfE and class-balancetextbfD manner. A mean-teacher model is then employed to correct labels of noisy samples. We additionally propose a self-adaptive and class-balanced sample re-weighting mechanism to assign different weights to detected noisy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T03:10:24Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• Importance of Disjoint Sampling in Conventional and Transformer Models for Hyperspectral Image Classification [2.1223532600703385]
  This paper presents an innovative disjoint sampling approach for training SOTA models on Hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) tasks. By separating training, validation, and test data without overlap, the proposed method facilitates a fairer evaluation of how well a model can classify pixels it was not exposed to during training or validation. This rigorous methodology is critical for advancing SOTA models and their real-world application to large-scale land mapping with Hyperspectral sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:40:52Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
  Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data. We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Split-PU: Hardness-aware Training Strategy for Positive-Unlabeled Learning [42.26185670834855]
  Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning aims to learn a model with rare positive samples and abundant unlabeled samples. This paper focuses on improving the commonly-used nnPU with a novel training pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T05:48:31Z)
• Weakly Supervised-Based Oversampling for High Imbalance and High Dimensionality Data Classification [2.9283685972609494]
  Oversampling is an effective method to solve imbalanced classification. Inaccurate labels of synthetic samples would distort the distribution of the dataset. This paper introduces the idea of weakly supervised learning to handle the inaccurate labeling of synthetic samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T15:26:34Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)
• Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
  A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples. We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries. We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.