Semi-supervised Learning For Robust Speech Evaluation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14666v1
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 02:11:24 GMT
- Title: Semi-supervised Learning For Robust Speech Evaluation
- Authors: Huayun Zhang, Jeremy H. M. Wong, Geyu Lin, Nancy F. Chen,
- Abstract summary: Speech evaluation measures a learners oral proficiency using automatic models.
This paper proposes to address such challenges by exploiting semi-supervised pre-training and objective regularization.
An anchor model is trained using pseudo labels to predict the correctness of pronunciation.
- Score: 30.593420641501968
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Speech evaluation measures a learners oral proficiency using automatic models. Corpora for training such models often pose sparsity challenges given that there often is limited scored data from teachers, in addition to the score distribution across proficiency levels being often imbalanced among student cohorts. Automatic scoring is thus not robust when faced with under-represented samples or out-of-distribution samples, which inevitably exist in real-world deployment scenarios. This paper proposes to address such challenges by exploiting semi-supervised pre-training and objective regularization to approximate subjective evaluation criteria. In particular, normalized mutual information is used to quantify the speech characteristics from the learner and the reference. An anchor model is trained using pseudo labels to predict the correctness of pronunciation. An interpolated loss function is proposed to minimize not only the prediction error with respect to ground-truth scores but also the divergence between two probability distributions estimated by the speech evaluation model and the anchor model. Compared to other state-of-the-art methods on a public data-set, this approach not only achieves high performance while evaluating the entire test-set as a whole, but also brings the most evenly distributed prediction error across distinct proficiency levels. Furthermore, empirical results show the model accuracy on out-of-distribution data also compares favorably with competitive baselines.
Related papers
- Assessing Model Generalization in Vicinity [34.86022681163714]
This paper evaluates the generalization ability of classification models on out-of-distribution test sets without depending on ground truth labels.
We propose incorporating responses from neighboring test samples into the correctness assessment of each individual sample.
The resulting scores are then averaged across all test samples to provide a holistic indication of model accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T15:58:37Z) - Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation [0.6656737591902598]
Cross-validation is a common method for estimating the predictive performance of machine learning models.
We show that an approach called "leave-one-out cross-validation" creates a negative correlation between the average label of each training fold and the label of its corresponding test instance.
We propose a generalizable rebalanced cross-validation approach that corrects for distributional bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T15:47:34Z) - Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice.
We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z) - Improving Adaptive Conformal Prediction Using Self-Supervised Learning [72.2614468437919]
We train an auxiliary model with a self-supervised pretext task on top of an existing predictive model and use the self-supervised error as an additional feature to estimate nonconformity scores.
We empirically demonstrate the benefit of the additional information using both synthetic and real data on the efficiency (width), deficit, and excess of conformal prediction intervals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T18:57:14Z) - A Statistical Model for Predicting Generalization in Few-Shot
Classification [6.158812834002346]
We introduce a Gaussian model of the feature distribution to predict the generalization error.
We show that our approach outperforms alternatives such as the leave-one-out cross-validation strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T10:21:15Z) - Self-Normalized Importance Sampling for Neural Language Modeling [97.96857871187052]
In this work, we propose self-normalized importance sampling. Compared to our previous work, the criteria considered in this work are self-normalized and there is no need to further conduct a correction step.
We show that our proposed self-normalized importance sampling is competitive in both research-oriented and production-oriented automatic speech recognition tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-11T16:57:53Z) - Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuning [57.4036085386653]
We show that prompt-based models for sentence pair classification tasks still suffer from a common pitfall of adopting inferences based on lexical overlap.
We then show that adding a regularization that preserves pretraining weights is effective in mitigating this destructive tendency of few-shot finetuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T10:10:29Z) - Identifying Wrongly Predicted Samples: A Method for Active Learning [6.976600214375139]
We propose a simple sample selection criterion that moves beyond uncertainty.
We show state-of-the-art results and better rates at identifying wrongly predicted samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-14T09:00:42Z) - Understanding Classifier Mistakes with Generative Models [88.20470690631372]
Deep neural networks are effective on supervised learning tasks, but have been shown to be brittle.
In this paper, we leverage generative models to identify and characterize instances where classifiers fail to generalize.
Our approach is agnostic to class labels from the training set which makes it applicable to models trained in a semi-supervised way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T22:13:21Z) - Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers.
We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model.
Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.