Privacy Evaluation Benchmarks for NLP Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15868v3
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 03:12:35 GMT
• Title: Privacy Evaluation Benchmarks for NLP Models
• Authors: Wei Huang, Yinggui Wang, Cen Chen,
• Abstract summary: We present a privacy attack and defense evaluation benchmark in the field of NLP. This benchmark supports a variety of models, datasets, and protocols, along with standardized modules for comprehensive evaluation of attacks and defense strategies. We propose a chained framework for privacy attacks. Allowing a practitioner to chain multiple attacks to achieve a higher-level attack objective.
• Score: 16.158384185081932
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: By inducing privacy attacks on NLP models, attackers can obtain sensitive information such as training data and model parameters, etc. Although researchers have studied, in-depth, several kinds of attacks in NLP models, they are non-systematic analyses. It lacks a comprehensive understanding of the impact caused by the attacks. For example, we must consider which scenarios can apply to which attacks, what the common factors are that affect the performance of different attacks, the nature of the relationships between different attacks, and the influence of various datasets and models on the effectiveness of the attacks, etc. Therefore, we need a benchmark to holistically assess the privacy risks faced by NLP models. In this paper, we present a privacy attack and defense evaluation benchmark in the field of NLP, which includes the conventional/small models and large language models (LLMs). This benchmark supports a variety of models, datasets, and protocols, along with standardized modules for comprehensive evaluation of attacks and defense strategies. Based on the above framework, we present a study on the association between auxiliary data from different domains and the strength of privacy attacks. And we provide an improved attack method in this scenario with the help of Knowledge Distillation (KD). Furthermore, we propose a chained framework for privacy attacks. Allowing a practitioner to chain multiple attacks to achieve a higher-level attack objective. Based on this, we provide some defense and enhanced attack strategies. The code for reproducing the results can be found at https://github.com/user2311717757/nlp_doctor.

Related papers

• SoK: Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning [21.73177249075515]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy, but its decentralized nature exposes it to client-side data poisoning attacks (DPAs) and model poisoning attacks (MPAs) This paper aims to provide a unified benchmark and analysis of defenses against DPAs and MPAs, clarifying the distinction between these two similar but slightly distinct domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T06:05:00Z)
• Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained Models [112.48136829374741]
  In this paper, we unveil a new vulnerability: the privacy backdoor attack. When a victim fine-tunes a backdoored model, their training data will be leaked at a significantly higher rate than if they had fine-tuned a typical model. Our findings highlight a critical privacy concern within the machine learning community and call for a reevaluation of safety protocols in the use of open-source pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Towards Attack-tolerant Federated Learning via Critical Parameter Analysis [85.41873993551332]
  Federated learning systems are susceptible to poisoning attacks when malicious clients send false updates to the central server. This paper proposes a new defense strategy, FedCPA (Federated learning with Critical Analysis) Our attack-tolerant aggregation method is based on the observation that benign local models have similar sets of top-k and bottom-k critical parameters, whereas poisoned local models do not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T05:37:55Z)
• Membership-Doctor: Comprehensive Assessment of Membership Inference Against Machine Learning Models [11.842337448801066]
  We present a large-scale measurement of different membership inference attacks and defenses. We find that some assumptions of the threat model, such as same-architecture and same-distribution between shadow and target models, are unnecessary. We are also the first to execute attacks on the real-world data collected from the Internet, instead of laboratory datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T17:00:53Z)
• Defending against the Label-flipping Attack in Federated Learning [5.769445676575767]
  Federated learning (FL) provides autonomy and privacy by design to participating peers. The label-flipping (LF) attack is a targeted poisoning attack where the attackers poison their training data by flipping the labels of some examples. We propose a novel defense that first dynamically extracts those gradients from the peers' local updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T12:02:54Z)
• A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks [72.7373468905418]
  We develop an open-source toolkit OpenBackdoor to foster the implementations and evaluations of textual backdoor learning. We also propose CUBE, a simple yet strong clustering-based defense baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T02:29:23Z)
• Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models [9.26208227402571]
  Membership inference attacks are used to quantify the private information that a model leaks about the individual data points in its training set. We derive new attack algorithms that can achieve a high AUC score while also highlighting the different factors that affect their performance. Our algorithms capture a very precise approximation of privacy loss in models, and can be used as a tool to perform an accurate and informed estimation of privacy risk in machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T13:31:22Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)
• Knowledge-Enriched Distributional Model Inversion Attacks [49.43828150561947]
  Model inversion (MI) attacks are aimed at reconstructing training data from model parameters. We present a novel inversion-specific GAN that can better distill knowledge useful for performing attacks on private models from public data. Our experiments show that the combination of these techniques can significantly boost the success rate of the state-of-the-art MI attacks by 150%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T16:20:48Z)
• Learning to Attack: Towards Textual Adversarial Attacking in Real-world Situations [81.82518920087175]
  Adversarial attacking aims to fool deep neural networks with adversarial examples. We propose a reinforcement learning based attack model, which can learn from attack history and launch attacks more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T09:12:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.