Sentiment Analysis of ML Projects: Bridging Emotional Intelligence and Code Quality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17885v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:34:01 GMT
• Title: Sentiment Analysis of ML Projects: Bridging Emotional Intelligence and Code Quality
• Authors: Md Shoaib Ahmed, Dongyoung Park, Nasir U. Eisty,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the relationship between sentiment analysis (SA) and code quality within machine learning (ML) projects. By integrating a comprehensive dataset of popular ML repositories, this analysis applies a blend of rule-based, machine learning, and hybrid sentiment analysis methodologies. Findings show that positive sentiments among developers are strongly associated with superior code quality manifested through reduced bugs and lower incidence of code smells.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the intricate relationship between sentiment analysis (SA) and code quality within machine learning (ML) projects, illustrating how the emotional dynamics of developers affect the technical and functional attributes of software projects. Recognizing the vital role of developer sentiments, this research employs advanced sentiment analysis techniques to scrutinize affective states from textual interactions such as code comments, commit messages, and issue discussions within high-profile ML projects. By integrating a comprehensive dataset of popular ML repositories, this analysis applies a blend of rule-based, machine learning, and hybrid sentiment analysis methodologies to systematically quantify sentiment scores. The emotional valence expressed by developers is then correlated with a spectrum of code quality indicators, including the prevalence of bugs, vulnerabilities, security hotspots, code smells, and duplication instances. Findings from this study distinctly illustrate that positive sentiments among developers are strongly associated with superior code quality metrics manifested through reduced bugs and lower incidence of code smells. This relationship underscores the importance of fostering positive emotional environments to enhance productivity and code craftsmanship. Conversely, the analysis reveals that negative sentiments correlate with an uptick in code issues, particularly increased duplication and heightened security risks, pointing to the detrimental effects of adverse emotional conditions on project health.

Related papers

• Disagreement as Data: Reasoning Trace Analytics in Multi-Agent Systems [0.0]
  We propose that reasoning traces generated by large language model (LLM) agents constitute a novel and rich form of process data.<n>We apply cosine similarity to reasoning traces to systematically detect, quantify, and interpret disagreements among agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T23:19:49Z)
• E^2-LLM: Bridging Neural Signals and Interpretable Affective Analysis [54.763420895859035]
  We present ELLM2-EEG-to-Emotion Large Language Model, first MLLM framework for interpretable emotion analysis from EEG.<n>ELLM integrates a pretrained EEG encoder with Q-based LLMs through learnable projection layers, employing a multi-stage training pipeline.<n>Experiments on the dataset across seven emotion categories demonstrate that ELLM2-EEG-to-Emotion Large Language Model achieves excellent performance on emotion classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T13:21:20Z)
• Coding With AI: From a Reflection on Industrial Practices to Future Computer Science and Software Engineering Education [1.5516092077598485]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have introduced new paradigms in software development.<n>This paper investigates how LLM coding tools are used in professional practice, associated concerns and risks, and the resulting transformations in development.<n>Building on these insights, we argue for curricular shifts toward problem-solving, architectural thinking, code review, and early project-based learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:39:59Z)
• A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code [49.09545217453401]
  Propensity Smelly Score (PSC) is a metric that estimates the likelihood of generating particular smell types.<n>We identify how generation strategy, model size, model architecture and prompt formulation shape the structural properties of generated code.<n> PSC helps developers interpret model behavior and assess code quality, providing evidence that smell propensity signals can support human judgement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T19:18:28Z)
• Process-based Indicators of Vulnerability Re-Introducing Code Changes: An Exploratory Case Study [2.204918347869259]
  This work highlights the critical role of process metrics along with code changes in understanding and mitigating vulnerability reintroduction.<n>Our approach emphasizes that reintroduction is rarely the result of one isolated action, but emerges from cumulative development activities and socio-technical conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T16:45:36Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• A survey on the impact of emotions on the productivity among software developers [0.9176056742068813]
  The time pressure associated with software development, among other factors, often leads to a diminished emotional state among developers.<n>This study aims to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between emotional state and perceived productivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T09:22:56Z)
• SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis [39.229080120880774]
  We introduce SV-TrustEval-C, a benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models' abilities for vulnerability analysis of code written in the C programming language.<n>Our results show that current LLMs are far from satisfactory in understanding complex code relationships and that their vulnerability analyses rely more on pattern matching than on robust logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T02:16:27Z)
• Sensitivity Meets Sparsity: The Impact of Extremely Sparse Parameter Patterns on Theory-of-Mind of Large Language Models [55.46269953415811]
  We identify ToM-sensitive parameters and show that perturbing as little as 0.001% of these parameters significantly degrades ToM performance. Our results have implications for enhancing model alignment, mitigating biases, and improving AI systems designed for human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T17:45:42Z)
• DeepPerception: Advancing R1-like Cognitive Visual Perception in MLLMs for Knowledge-Intensive Visual Grounding [61.26026947423187]
  Human experts excel at fine-grained visual discrimination by leveraging domain knowledge to refine perceptual features. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to integrate reasoning into visual perception. We propose DeepPerception, an MLLM enhanced with cognitive visual perception capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T04:06:34Z)
• Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer Insights [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel scoring mechanism called the SBC score. It is based on a reverse generation technique that leverages the natural language generation capabilities of Large Language Models. Unlike direct code analysis, our approach reconstructs system requirements from AI-generated code and compares them with the original specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T01:12:11Z)
• SOK: Exploring Hallucinations and Security Risks in AI-Assisted Software Development with Insights for LLM Deployment [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, Cursor AI, and Codeium AI have revolutionized the coding landscape. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the benefits and risks associated with AI-powered coding tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T06:00:27Z)
• ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs [72.13489820420726]
  ProSA is a framework designed to evaluate and comprehend prompt sensitivity in large language models. Our study uncovers that prompt sensitivity fluctuates across datasets and models, with larger models exhibiting enhanced robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T09:38:13Z)
• A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems [12.887834116390358]
  Ethical implications appear when designing evaluations of machine learning systems. We present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T01:06:49Z)
• GPT as Psychologist? Preliminary Evaluations for GPT-4V on Visual Affective Computing [74.68232970965595]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are designed to process and integrate information from multiple sources, such as text, speech, images, and videos. This paper assesses the application of MLLMs with 5 crucial abilities for affective computing, spanning from visual affective tasks and reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T13:56:25Z)
• EmoBench: Evaluating the Emotional Intelligence of Large Language Models [73.60839120040887]
  EmoBench is a benchmark that draws upon established psychological theories and proposes a comprehensive definition for machine Emotional Intelligence (EI) EmoBench includes a set of 400 hand-crafted questions in English and Chinese, which are meticulously designed to require thorough reasoning and understanding. Our findings reveal a considerable gap between the EI of existing Large Language Models and the average human, highlighting a promising direction for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:48:09Z)
• Deep Imbalanced Learning for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations [15.705757672984662]
  Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC) is a significant development direction for machine intelligence. Many data in MERC naturally exhibit an imbalanced distribution of emotion categories, and researchers ignore the negative impact of imbalanced data on emotion recognition. We propose the Class Boundary Enhanced Representation Learning (CBERL) model to address the imbalanced distribution of emotion categories in raw data. We have conducted extensive experiments on the IEMOCAP and MELD benchmark datasets, and the results show that CBERL has achieved a certain performance improvement in the effectiveness of emotion recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T12:35:17Z)
• How are Prompts Different in Terms of Sensitivity? [50.67313477651395]
  We present a comprehensive prompt analysis based on the sensitivity of a function. We use gradient-based saliency scores to empirically demonstrate how different prompts affect the relevance of input tokens to the output. We introduce sensitivity-aware decoding which incorporates sensitivity estimation as a penalty term in the standard greedy decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T10:52:01Z)
• Static Code Analysis in the AI Era: An In-depth Exploration of the Concept, Function, and Potential of Intelligent Code Analysis Agents [2.8686437689115363]
  We introduce the Intelligent Code Analysis Agent (ICAA), a novel concept combining AI models, engineering process designs, and traditional non-AI components. We observed a substantial improvement in bug detection accuracy, reducing the false-positive rate to 66% from the baseline's 85%, and a promising recall rate of 60.8%. Despite this challenge, our findings suggest that the ICAA holds considerable potential to revolutionize software quality assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T03:16:58Z)
• Understanding Self-Efficacy in the Context of Software Engineering: A Qualitative Study in the Industry [2.268415020650315]
  Self-efficacy is a concept researched in various areas of knowledge that impacts various factors such as performance, satisfaction, and motivation. This study aims to understand the impact on the software development context with a focus on understanding the behavioral signs of self-efficacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T17:16:37Z)
• CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing [139.77117915309023]
  CRITIC allows large language models to validate and amend their own outputs in a manner similar to human interaction with tools. Comprehensive evaluations involving free-form question answering, mathematical program synthesis, and toxicity reduction demonstrate that CRITIC consistently enhances the performance of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T15:19:44Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)
• The Mind Is a Powerful Place: How Showing Code Comprehensibility Metrics Influences Code Understanding [10.644832702859484]
  We investigate whether a displayed metric value for source code comprehensibility anchors developers in their subjective rating of source code comprehensibility. We found that the displayed value of a comprehensibility metric has a significant and large anchoring effect on a developer's code comprehensibility rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T14:27:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.