Leveraging MTD to Mitigate Poisoning Attacks in Decentralized FL with Non-IID Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19302v3
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:21:17 GMT
• Title: Leveraging MTD to Mitigate Poisoning Attacks in Decentralized FL with Non-IID Data
• Authors: Chao Feng, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Zien Zeng, Zi Ye, Jan von der Assen, Gerome Bovet, Burkhard Stiller,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a framework that employs the Moving Target Defense (MTD) approach to bolster the robustness of DFL models. By continuously modifying the attack surface of the DFL system, this framework aims to mitigate poisoning attacks effectively.
• Score: 9.715501137911552
• License:
• Abstract: Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL), a paradigm for managing big data in a privacy-preserved manner, is still vulnerable to poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with data or models. Current defense methods often assume Independently and Identically Distributed (IID) data, which is unrealistic in real-world applications. In non-IID contexts, existing defensive strategies face challenges in distinguishing between models that have been compromised and those that have been trained on heterogeneous data distributions, leading to diminished efficacy. In response, this paper proposes a framework that employs the Moving Target Defense (MTD) approach to bolster the robustness of DFL models. By continuously modifying the attack surface of the DFL system, this framework aims to mitigate poisoning attacks effectively. The proposed MTD framework includes both proactive and reactive modes, utilizing a reputation system that combines metrics of model similarity and loss, alongside various defensive techniques. Comprehensive experimental evaluations indicate that the MTD-based mechanism significantly mitigates a range of poisoning attack types across multiple datasets with different topologies.

Related papers

• Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning [0.0]
  We introduce Celtibero, a novel defense mechanism that integrates layered aggregation to enhance robustness against adversarial manipulation. We demonstrate that Celtibero consistently achieves high main task accuracy (MTA) while maintaining minimal attack success rates (ASR) across a range of untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T12:54:00Z)
• Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense [3.685395311534351]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T20:27:45Z)
• Poisoning with A Pill: Circumventing Detection in Federated Learning [33.915489514978084]
  This paper proposes a generic and attack-agnostic augmentation approach designed to enhance the effectiveness and stealthiness of existing FL poisoning attacks against detection in FL. Specifically, we employ a three-stage methodology that strategically constructs, generates, and injects poison into a pill during the FL training, named as pill construction, pill poisoning, and pill injection accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T05:34:47Z)
• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• Sentinel: An Aggregation Function to Secure Decentralized Federated Learning [9.046402244232343]
  Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerges as an innovative paradigm to train collaborative models, addressing the single point of failure limitation. Existing defense mechanisms have been designed for centralized FL and they do not adequately exploit the particularities of DFL. This work introduces Sentinel, a defense strategy to counteract poisoning attacks in DFL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T07:45:18Z)
• Towards Attack-tolerant Federated Learning via Critical Parameter Analysis [85.41873993551332]
  Federated learning systems are susceptible to poisoning attacks when malicious clients send false updates to the central server. This paper proposes a new defense strategy, FedCPA (Federated learning with Critical Analysis) Our attack-tolerant aggregation method is based on the observation that benign local models have similar sets of top-k and bottom-k critical parameters, whereas poisoned local models do not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T05:37:55Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• Bilateral Dependency Optimization: Defending Against Model-inversion Attacks [61.78426165008083]
  We propose a bilateral dependency optimization (BiDO) strategy to defend against model-inversion attacks. BiDO achieves the state-of-the-art defense performance for a variety of datasets, classifiers, and MI attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-11T10:07:03Z)
• Delving into Data: Effectively Substitute Training for Black-box Attack [84.85798059317963]
  We propose a novel perspective substitute training that focuses on designing the distribution of data used in the knowledge stealing process. The combination of these two modules can further boost the consistency of the substitute model and target model, which greatly improves the effectiveness of adversarial attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T07:26:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.