Explainable Multi-Stakeholder Job Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00654v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 13:12:30 GMT
• Title: Explainable Multi-Stakeholder Job Recommender Systems
• Authors: Roan Schellingerhout,
• Abstract summary: New laws focus on aspects such as privacy, fairness, and explainability for recommender systems and AI at large. There is a need for a multi-stakeholder approach, as these systems are used by job seekers, recruiters, and companies simultaneously. I summarize my current research on the topic of explainable, multi-stakeholder job recommender systems and set out a number of future research directions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Public opinion on recommender systems has become increasingly wary in recent years. In line with this trend, lawmakers have also started to become more critical of such systems, resulting in the introduction of new laws focusing on aspects such as privacy, fairness, and explainability for recommender systems and AI at large. These concepts are especially crucial in high-risk domains such as recruitment. In recruitment specifically, decisions carry substantial weight, as the outcomes can significantly impact individuals' careers and companies' success. Additionally, there is a need for a multi-stakeholder approach, as these systems are used by job seekers, recruiters, and companies simultaneously, each with its own requirements and expectations. In this paper, I summarize my current research on the topic of explainable, multi-stakeholder job recommender systems and set out a number of future research directions.

Related papers

• A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research [45.86892639035389]
  This study explores fairness, bias, threats, and privacy in recommender systems. It examines how algorithmic decisions can unintentionally reinforce biases or marginalize specific user and item groups. The study suggests future research directions to improve recommender systems' robustness, fairness, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T11:00:35Z)
• All Roads Lead to Rome: Unveiling the Trajectory of Recommender Systems Across the LLM Era [63.649070507815715]
  We aim to integrate recommender systems into a broader picture, and pave the way for more comprehensive solutions for future research. We identify two evolution paths of modern recommender systems -- via list-wise recommendation and conversational recommendation. We point out that the information effectiveness of the recommendation is increased, while the user's acquisition cost is decreased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T05:02:21Z)
• Course Recommender Systems Need to Consider the Job Market [16.88792726960708]
  This paper focuses on the perspective of academic researchers, working in collaboration with the industry, aiming to develop a course recommender system that incorporates job market skill demands. We outline essential properties for course recommender systems to address these demands effectively, including explainable, sequential, unsupervised, and aligned with the job market and user's goals. We introduce an initial system that addresses some existing limitations of course recommender systems using large Language Models (LLMs) for skill extraction and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for alignment with the job market.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T19:52:57Z)
• Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs) [62.0129013439038]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) We conduct a comprehensive review of LLM-empowered recommender systems from various aspects including Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T06:03:40Z)
• A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems [59.23208133653637]
  We present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, we delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T07:08:22Z)
• Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation [1.4123323039043334]
  Growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T10:07:41Z)
• Recommender Systems: A Primer [7.487718119544156]
  We provide an overview of the traditional formulation of the recommendation problem. We then review the classical algorithmic paradigms for item retrieval and ranking. We discuss a number of recent developments in recommender systems research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T06:19:05Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems [32.523177842969915]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of Trustworthy Recommender systems (TRec) with a specific focus on six of the most important aspects. For each aspect, we summarize the recent related technologies and discuss potential research directions to help achieve trustworthy recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T04:34:17Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
  We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems. We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation. We introduce datasets used in these works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.