CommonIT: Commonality-Aware Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models via Data Partitions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03077v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 01:42:35 GMT
• Title: CommonIT: Commonality-Aware Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models via Data Partitions
• Authors: Jun Rao, Xuebo Liu, Lian Lian, Shengjun Cheng, Yunjie Liao, Min Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel instruction tuning strategy termed CommonIT: Commonality-aware Instruction Tuning. Specifically, we cluster instruction datasets into distinct groups with three proposed metrics (Task, Embedding and Length) Rigorous testing on LLaMa models demonstrates CommonIT's effectiveness in enhancing the instruction-following capabilities of LLMs.
• Score: 17.252582058787937
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With instruction tuning, Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance their ability to adhere to commands. Diverging from most works focusing on data mixing, our study concentrates on enhancing the model's capabilities from the perspective of data sampling during training. Drawing inspiration from the human learning process, where it is generally easier to master solutions to similar topics through focused practice on a single type of topic, we introduce a novel instruction tuning strategy termed CommonIT: Commonality-aware Instruction Tuning. Specifically, we cluster instruction datasets into distinct groups with three proposed metrics (Task, Embedding and Length). We ensure each training mini-batch, or "partition", consists solely of data from a single group, which brings about both data randomness across mini-batches and intra-batch data similarity. Rigorous testing on LLaMa models demonstrates CommonIT's effectiveness in enhancing the instruction-following capabilities of LLMs through IT datasets (FLAN, CoT, and Alpaca) and models (LLaMa2-7B, Qwen2-7B, LLaMa 13B, and BLOOM 7B). CommonIT consistently boosts an average improvement of 2.1\% on the general domain (i.e., the average score of Knowledge, Reasoning, Multilinguality and Coding) with the Length metric, and 5.2\% on the special domain (i.e., GSM, Openfunctions and Code) with the Task metric, and 3.8\% on the specific tasks (i.e., MMLU) with the Embedding metric. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/raojay7/CommonIT}.

Related papers

• Pilot: Building the Federated Multimodal Instruction Tuning Framework [79.56362403673354]
  Our framework integrates two stages of "adapter on adapter" into the connector of the vision encoder and the LLM. In stage 1, we extract task-specific features and client-specific features from visual information. In stage 2, we build the cross-task Mixture-of-Adapters(CT-MoA) module to perform cross-task interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T07:49:24Z)
• MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks. Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales. We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z)
• Dynamic Data Mixing Maximizes Instruction Tuning for Mixture-of-Experts [20.202031878825153]
  We propose a novel dynamic data mixture for MoE instruction tuning. Inspired by MoE's token routing preference, we build dataset-level representations and then capture the subtle differences among datasets. Results on two MoE models demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on both downstream knowledge & reasoning tasks and open-ended queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:47:03Z)
• Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models? [141.2019867466968]
  Membership inference attacks (MIAs) attempt to predict whether a particular datapoint is a member of a target model's training data. We perform a large-scale evaluation of MIAs over a suite of language models trained on the Pile, ranging from 160M to 12B parameters. We find that MIAs barely outperform random guessing for most settings across varying LLM sizes and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T17:52:05Z)
• EntGPT: Linking Generative Large Language Models with Knowledge Bases [8.557683104631883]
  We introduce EntGPT, employing advanced prompt engineering to enhance EL tasks. Our three-step hard-prompting method (EntGPT-P) significantly boosts the micro-F_1 score by up to 36% over vanilla prompts. Our instruction tuning method (EntGPT-I) improves micro-F_1 scores by 2.1% on average in supervised EL tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T19:16:27Z)
• Distribution Matching for Multi-Task Learning of Classification Tasks: a Large-Scale Study on Faces & Beyond [62.406687088097605]
  Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a framework, where multiple related tasks are learned jointly and benefit from a shared representation space. We show that MTL can be successful with classification tasks with little, or non-overlapping annotations. We propose a novel approach, where knowledge exchange is enabled between the tasks via distribution matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T14:18:11Z)
• One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Models [108.81681547472138]
  textscNuggets uses one-shot learning to select high-quality instruction data from extensive datasets. We show that instruction tuning with the top 1% of examples curated by textscNuggets substantially outperforms conventional methods employing the entire dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T03:33:12Z)
• Universal Metric Learning with Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning [40.85295050164728]
  A common practice in metric learning is to train and test an embedding model for each dataset. This dataset-specific approach fails to simulate real-world scenarios that involve multiple heterogeneous distributions of data. We introduce a novel metric learning paradigm, called Universal Metric Learning (UML), which learns a unified metric capable of capturing relations across multiple data distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T10:34:01Z)
• USER: Unified Semantic Enhancement with Momentum Contrast for Image-Text Retrieval [115.28586222748478]
  Image-Text Retrieval (ITR) aims at searching for the target instances that are semantically relevant to the given query from the other modality. Existing approaches typically suffer from two major limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T12:42:58Z)
• Boosting Natural Language Generation from Instructions with Meta-Learning [43.64522457686405]
  Recent work has shown that language models (LMs) trained with multi-task. textitinstructional learning (MTIL) can solve diverse NLP. tasks with improved performance compared to prompt tuning. In this paper we investigate whether meta-learning applied to MTIL can further improve generalization to unseen tasks in a zero-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T22:23:23Z)
• When to Use Multi-Task Learning vs Intermediate Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Encoder Transfer Learning [15.39115079099451]
  Transfer learning (TL) in natural language processing has seen a surge of interest in recent years. Three main strategies have emerged for making use of multiple supervised datasets during fine-tuning. We compare all three TL methods in a comprehensive analysis on the GLUE dataset suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T06:48:45Z)
• Semi-supervised Multi-task Learning for Semantics and Depth [88.77716991603252]
  Multi-Task Learning (MTL) aims to enhance the model generalization by sharing representations between related tasks for better performance. We propose the Semi-supervised Multi-Task Learning (MTL) method to leverage the available supervisory signals from different datasets. We present a domain-aware discriminator structure with various alignment formulations to mitigate the domain discrepancy issue among datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T07:43:39Z)
• Task Attended Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Learning [3.0724051098062097]
  We introduce a training curriculum motivated by selective focus in humans, called task attended meta-training, to weight the tasks in a batch. The comparisons of the models with their non-task-attended counterparts on complex datasets validate its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-20T07:34:37Z)
• Improving Generalization in Meta-learning via Task Augmentation [69.83677015207527]
  We propose two task augmentation methods, including MetaMix and Channel Shuffle. Both MetaMix and Channel Shuffle outperform state-of-the-art results by a large margin across many datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-26T01:50:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.