Strategic Insights from Simulation Gaming of AI Race Dynamics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03092v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 02:34:21 GMT
• Title: Strategic Insights from Simulation Gaming of AI Race Dynamics
• Abstract summary: "Intelligence Rising" is a scenario exploration exercise about possible AI futures. We illuminate recurring patterns, strategies, and decision-making processes observed during gameplay.
• Score: 43.04595873106823
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present insights from "Intelligence Rising", a scenario exploration exercise about possible AI futures. Drawing on the experiences of facilitators who have overseen 43 games over a four-year period, we illuminate recurring patterns, strategies, and decision-making processes observed during gameplay. Our analysis reveals key strategic considerations about AI development trajectories in this simulated environment, including: the destabilising effects of AI races, the crucial role of international cooperation in mitigating catastrophic risks, the challenges of aligning corporate and national interests, and the potential for rapid, transformative change in AI capabilities. We highlight places where we believe the game has been effective in exposing participants to the complexities and uncertainties inherent in AI governance. Key recurring gameplay themes include the emergence of international agreements, challenges to the robustness of such agreements, the critical role of cybersecurity in AI development, and the potential for unexpected crises to dramatically alter AI trajectories. By documenting these insights, we aim to provide valuable foresight for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers navigating the complex landscape of AI development and governance.

Related papers

• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• Responsible AI: The Good, The Bad, The AI [1.932555230783329]
  This paper presents a comprehensive examination of AI's dual nature through the lens of strategic information systems.<n>We develop the Paradox-based Responsible AI Governance (PRAIG) framework that articulates: (1) the strategic benefits of AI adoption, (2) the inherent risks and unintended consequences, and (3) governance mechanisms that enable organizations to navigate these tensions.<n>The paper concludes with a research agenda for advancing responsible AI governance scholarship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T22:33:27Z)
• Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences [50.9036832382286]
  We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z)
• AI Governance to Avoid Extinction: The Strategic Landscape and Actionable Research Questions [2.07180164747172]
  Humanity appears to be on course to soon develop AI systems that substantially outperform human experts.<n>We believe the default trajectory has a high likelihood of catastrophe, including human extinction.<n>Risks come from failure to control powerful AI systems, misuse of AI by malicious rogue actors, war between great powers, and authoritarian lock-in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T17:35:36Z)
• Perceptions of Agentic AI in Organizations: Implications for Responsible AI and ROI [0.0]
  This paper investigates how organizations perceive and adapt such frameworks amidst the emerging landscape of agentic AI. Findings highlight that the inherent complexity of agentic AI systems and their responsible implementation, rooted in the intricate interconnectedness of responsible AI dimensions and the thematic framework, contribute to significant challenges in organizational adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T19:15:06Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict. Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers. We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Securing the AI Frontier: Urgent Ethical and Regulatory Imperatives for AI-Driven Cybersecurity [0.0]
  This paper critically examines the evolving ethical and regulatory challenges posed by the integration of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity. We trace the historical development of AI regulation, highlighting major milestones from theoretical discussions in the 1940s to the implementation of recent global frameworks such as the European Union AI Act. Ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight are explored in depth, along with their implications for AI-driven cybersecurity systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T18:17:37Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, yet its adoption is often hindered by concerns about data privacy, security, and the understanding of AI capabilities. This paper synthesizes AI governance approaches, strategic themes, and enablers and challenges for AI adoption by reviewing national AI strategies from leading nations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:00:42Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors [1.1060425537315088]
  This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI) may impact the strategic decision-making (SDM) process in firms. We illustrate how AI could augment existing SDM tools and provide empirical evidence from a leading accelerator program and a startup competition. We examine implications for key cognitive processes underlying SDM -- search, representation, and aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T15:46:15Z)
• Responsible AI for Earth Observation [10.380878519901998]
  We systematically define the intersection of AI and EO, with a central focus on responsible AI practices. We identify several critical components guiding this exploration from both academia and industry perspectives. The paper explores potential opportunities and emerging trends, providing valuable insights for future research endeavors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:47:27Z)
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the C-Suite: The Role of the Chief AI Officer [0.0]
  I explore the role of the Chief AI Officer (CAIO) within the C-suite, emphasizing the necessity of this position for successful AI strategy, integration, and governance. I analyze future scenarios based on current trends in three key areas: the AI Economy, AI Organization, and Competition in the Age of AI. This paper advances the discussion on AI leadership by providing a rationale for the strategic integration of AI at the executive level and examining the role of the Chief AI Officer within organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T19:07:18Z)
• Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
  Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance [8.658519485150423]
  We show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game. We propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:18:42Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.