Securing the AI Frontier: Urgent Ethical and Regulatory Imperatives for AI-Driven Cybersecurity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10467v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:17:37 GMT
• Title: Securing the AI Frontier: Urgent Ethical and Regulatory Imperatives for AI-Driven Cybersecurity
• Authors: Vikram Kulothungan,
• Abstract summary: This paper critically examines the evolving ethical and regulatory challenges posed by the integration of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.<n>We trace the historical development of AI regulation, highlighting major milestones from theoretical discussions in the 1940s to the implementation of recent global frameworks such as the European Union AI Act.<n>Ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight are explored in depth, along with their implications for AI-driven cybersecurity systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper critically examines the evolving ethical and regulatory challenges posed by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in cybersecurity. We trace the historical development of AI regulation, highlighting major milestones from theoretical discussions in the 1940s to the implementation of recent global frameworks such as the European Union AI Act. The current regulatory landscape is analyzed, emphasizing risk-based approaches, sector-specific regulations, and the tension between fostering innovation and mitigating risks. Ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight are explored in depth, along with their implications for AI-driven cybersecurity systems. Furthermore, we propose strategies for promoting AI literacy and public engagement, essential for shaping a future regulatory framework. Our findings underscore the need for a unified, globally harmonized regulatory approach that addresses the unique risks of AI in cybersecurity. We conclude by identifying future research opportunities and recommending pathways for collaboration between policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers to ensure the responsible deployment of AI technologies in cybersecurity.

Related papers

• Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape [42.771086928042315]
  This paper presents an in-depth analysis of frontier AI's impact on cybersecurity. We first define and categorize the marginal risks of frontier AI in cybersecurity. We then systemically analyze the current and future impacts of frontier AI in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T18:25:18Z)
• AI threats to national security can be countered through an incident regime [55.2480439325792]
  We propose a legally mandated post-deployment AI incident regime that aims to counter potential national security threats from AI systems. Our proposed AI incident regime is split into three phases. The first phase revolves around a novel operationalization of what counts as an 'AI incident' The second and third phases spell out that AI providers should notify a government agency about incidents, and that the government agency should be involved in amending AI providers' security and safety procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T17:51:50Z)
• Ethical Implications of AI in Data Collection: Balancing Innovation with Privacy [0.0]
  This article examines the ethical and legal implications of artificial intelligence (AI) driven data collection, focusing on developments from 2023 to 2024. It compares regulatory approaches in the European Union, the United States, and China, highlighting the challenges in creating a globally harmonized framework for AI governance. The article emphasizes the need for adaptive governance and international cooperation to address the global nature of AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T14:15:59Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems. Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Decoding the Black Box: Integrating Moral Imagination with Technical AI Governance [0.0]
  We develop a comprehensive framework designed to regulate AI technologies deployed in high-stakes domains such as defense, finance, healthcare, and education. Our approach combines rigorous technical analysis, quantitative risk assessment, and normative evaluation to expose systemic vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T03:11:32Z)
• Decentralized Governance of Autonomous AI Agents [0.0]
  ETHOS is a decentralized governance (DeGov) model leveraging Web3 technologies, including blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs)<n>It establishes a global registry for AI agents, enabling dynamic risk classification, proportional oversight, and automated compliance monitoring.<n>By integrating philosophical principles of rationality, ethical grounding, and goal alignment, ETHOS aims to create a robust research agenda for promoting trust, transparency, and participatory governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T18:01:49Z)
• From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations [13.753819576072127]
  The article thoroughly analyzes the ground-breaking AI regulatory framework proposed by the European Union.<n>Considering the technical efforts and strategies undertaken by academics and industry to uphold these principles, we explore the synergies and conflicts among the five ethical principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T00:46:20Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Towards a Privacy and Security-Aware Framework for Ethical AI: Guiding the Development and Assessment of AI Systems [0.0]
  This study conducts a systematic literature review spanning the years 2020 to 2023. Through the synthesis of knowledge extracted from the SLR, this study presents a conceptual framework tailored for privacy- and security-aware AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:39:57Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.