ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following Procedure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03117v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 03:21:24 GMT
• Title: ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following Procedure
• Authors: Ippei Fujisawa, Sensho Nobe, Hiroki Seto, Rina Onda, Yoshiaki Uchida, Hiroki Ikoma, Pei-Chun Chien, Ryota Kanai,
• Abstract summary: We propose a benchmark that focuses on a specific aspect of reasoning ability: the direct evaluation of multi-step inference. Our dataset comprises pairs of explicit instructions and corresponding questions, where the procedures necessary for solving the questions are entirely detailed within the instructions. By constructing problems that require varying numbers of steps to solve and evaluating responses at each step, we enable a thorough assessment of state-of-the-art LLMs' ability to follow instructions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reasoning is central to a wide range of intellectual activities, and while the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, their performance in reasoning tasks remains limited. The processes and mechanisms underlying reasoning are not yet fully understood, but key elements include path exploration, selection of relevant knowledge, and multi-step inference. Problems are solved through the synthesis of these components. In this paper, we propose a benchmark that focuses on a specific aspect of reasoning ability: the direct evaluation of multi-step inference. To this end, we design a special reasoning task where multi-step inference is specifically focused by largely eliminating path exploration and implicit knowledge utilization. Our dataset comprises pairs of explicit instructions and corresponding questions, where the procedures necessary for solving the questions are entirely detailed within the instructions. This setup allows models to solve problems solely by following the provided directives. By constructing problems that require varying numbers of steps to solve and evaluating responses at each step, we enable a thorough assessment of state-of-the-art LLMs' ability to follow instructions. To ensure the robustness of our evaluation, we include multiple distinct tasks. Furthermore, by comparing accuracy across tasks, utilizing step-aware metrics, and applying separately defined measures of complexity, we conduct experiments that offer insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in reasoning tasks. Our findings have significant implications for the development of LLMs and highlight areas for future research in advancing their reasoning abilities. Our dataset is available at \url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/ifujisawa/procbench} and code at \url{https://github.com/ifujisawa/proc-bench}.

Related papers

• Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning [52.83539473110143]
  We introduce a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help Large Language Models (LLMs) better understand a question. To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA) Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:30:33Z)
• BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts [59.83547898874152]
  We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T09:27:52Z)
• DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories Search [37.16633337724158]
  DOTS is an approach enabling LLMs to reason dynamically via optimal reasoning trajectory search. Our method consistently outperforms static reasoning techniques and the vanilla instruction tuning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:58:09Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for Conversational Question Answering in Multi-instructional Documents [61.41316121093604]
  We present InsCoQA, a novel benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in the context of conversational question answering (CQA) Sourced from extensive, encyclopedia-style instructional content, InsCoQA assesses models on their ability to retrieve, interpret, and accurately summarize procedural guidance from multiple documents. We also propose InsEval, an LLM-assisted evaluator that measures the integrity and accuracy of generated responses and procedural instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T09:10:00Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making. We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill. Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Interactive-KBQA: Multi-Turn Interactions for Knowledge Base Question Answering with Large Language Models [7.399563588835834]
  Interactive-KBQA is a framework designed to generate logical forms through direct interaction with knowledge bases (KBs) Our method achieves competitive results on the WebQuestionsSP, ComplexWebQuestions, KQA Pro, and MetaQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T06:32:18Z)
• When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks [54.71034943526973]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs) We find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications. We identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:26:30Z)
• Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction [33.88499005859982]
  Event relation extraction is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T14:53:06Z)
• Multi-Task Instruction Tuning of LLaMa for Specific Scenarios: A Preliminary Study on Writing Assistance [60.40541387785977]
  Small foundational models can display remarkable proficiency in tackling diverse tasks when fine-tuned using instruction-driven data. In this work, we investigate a practical problem setting where the primary focus is on one or a few particular tasks rather than general-purpose instruction following. Experimental results show that fine-tuning LLaMA on writing instruction data significantly improves its ability on writing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T16:56:44Z)
• Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models [26.5029080638055]
  This paper proposes a new method, Active-Prompt, to adapt large language models to different tasks. By borrowing ideas from the related problem of uncertainty-based active learning, we introduce several metrics to characterize the uncertainty. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method, achieving state-of-the-art on eight complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:58:59Z)
• Shepherd Pre-trained Language Models to Develop a Train of Thought: An Iterative Prompting Approach [30.117038793151004]
  Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have been shown incapable of recalling knowledge to solve tasks requiring complex & multi-step inference procedures. Similar to how humans develop a "train of thought" for these tasks, how can we equip PLMs with such abilities? We propose an iterative context-aware prompter, which addresses these limitations by learning to dynamically synthesize conditioned prompts on the current step's contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T04:12:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.