BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04094v1
• Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 09:27:52 GMT
• Title: BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts
• Authors: Maria-Eleni Zoumpoulidi, Georgios Paraskevopoulos, Alexandros Potamianos,
• Abstract summary: We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
• Score: 59.83547898874152
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite the continuous progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various tasks, their performance on mathematical problems and reasoning tasks remains limited. This limitation can be attributed, among other factors, to the inherent difficulty of these problems and the fact that solutions often consist of multiple steps, potentially of varying nature, making it challenging for a single prompting technique to execute all required steps. To address this, we introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's Taxonomy, aiming to improve LLMs' performance in solving such problems by encouraging them to approach the problem starting from simple, i.e., remembering, and progressing to higher cognitive skills, i.e., analyzing, until the correct solution is reached. The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. Thus, we encourage the LLM to deploy the appropriate cognitive processes. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach. We also present extensive ablations, analyzing the strengths of each module within our system.

Related papers

• Fast or Slow? Integrating Fast Intuition and Deliberate Thinking for Enhancing Visual Question Answering [11.271123465926301]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still struggle with complex reasoning tasks in Visual Question Answering.<n>We propose FOCUS, a plug-and-play approach that dynamically adapts to the complexity of questions.<n>Experiments on four benchmarks, ScienceQA, TextQA, VizWiz, and MME, demonstrate that FOCUS consistently improves the performance of both open-source and black-box MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T03:15:29Z)
• A Survey of Slow Thinking-based Reasoning LLMs using Reinforced Learning and Inference-time Scaling Law [29.763080554625216]
  This survey explores recent advancements in reasoning large language models (LLMs) designed to mimic "slow thinking"<n>LLMs focus on scaling computational resources dynamically during complex tasks, such as math reasoning, visual reasoning, medical diagnosis, and multi-agent debates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T14:14:59Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Dancing with Critiques: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Stepwise Natural Language Self-Critique [66.94905631175209]
  We propose a novel inference-time scaling approach -- stepwise natural language self-critique (PANEL) It employs self-generated natural language critiques as feedback to guide the step-level search process. This approach bypasses the need for task-specific verifiers and the associated training overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:59:55Z)
• Towards Understanding Multi-Round Large Language Model Reasoning: Approximability, Learnability and Generalizability [18.54202114336492]
  We investigate the approximation, learnability, and generalization properties of multi-round auto-regressive models.<n>We show that Transformers with finite context windows are universal approximators for steps of Turing-computable functions.<n>We extend PAC learning to sequence generation and demonstrate that multi-round generation is learnable even when the sequence length exceeds the model's context window.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T02:50:55Z)
• TextGames: Learning to Self-Play Text-Based Puzzle Games via Language Model Reasoning [26.680686158061192]
  Reasoning is a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper introduces TextGames, a benchmark specifically crafted to assess LLMs through demanding text-based games.<n>Our findings reveal that although LLMs exhibit proficiency in addressing most easy and medium-level problems, they face significant challenges with more difficult tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T18:26:48Z)
• LLM Reasoning Engine: Specialized Training for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning [7.512199306943756]
  We present a novel method to enhance Large Language Models' capabilities in mathematical reasoning tasks. Motivated by the need to bridge this gap, our approach incorporates a question paraphrase strategy. specialized training objectives are employed to guide the model's learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T17:48:33Z)
• Supervised Chain of Thought [5.389461633686935]
  Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting offers a promising approach to solving complex reasoning tasks. One-prompt-for-all approach poses significant challenges for models to generate the correct reasoning steps. We show how task-specific supervision is essential for navigating the prompt space accurately and achieving optimal performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T06:25:27Z)
• Deconfounded Causality-aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Problem-Solving Improvement of LLMs [12.48241058167222]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in tackling various tasks based on human instructions. But studies reveal that they often struggle with tasks requiring reasoning, such as math or physics limitation. This raises questions about whether LLMs truly comprehend embedded knowledge or merely learn to replicate the token distribution without a true understanding of the content. We propose Decon Causal Adaptation (DCA), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method to enhance the model's reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T13:17:09Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
  We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z)
• Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning [89.89857766491475]
  We propose a curriculum-based logical-aware instruction tuning framework, named LACT.<n>Specifically, we augment the arbitrary first-order logical queries via binary tree decomposition.<n> Experiments across widely used datasets demonstrate that LACT has substantial improvements(brings an average +5.5% MRR score) over advanced methods, achieving the new state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T18:12:08Z)
• Reinforcement Learning Problem Solving with Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have an extensive amount of world knowledge, and this has enabled their application in various domains to improve the performance of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. This has also facilitated a more accessible paradigm of conversation-based interactions between humans and AI systems to solve intended problems. We show the practicality of our approach through two detailed case studies for "Research Scientist" and "Legal Matter Intake"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:16:08Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)
• Distilling Algorithmic Reasoning from LLMs via Explaining Solution Programs [2.3020018305241337]
  Distilling explicit chain-of-thought reasoning paths has emerged as an effective method for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models. We propose a novel approach to distill reasoning abilities from LLMs by leveraging their capacity to explain solutions. Our experiments demonstrate that learning from explanations enables the Reasoner to more effectively guide program implementation by a Coder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T22:19:50Z)
• Scalable Language Model with Generalized Continual Learning [58.700439919096155]
  The Joint Adaptive Re-ization (JARe) is integrated with Dynamic Task-related Knowledge Retrieval (DTKR) to enable adaptive adjustment of language models based on specific downstream tasks. Our method demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on diverse backbones and benchmarks, achieving effective continual learning in both full-set and few-shot scenarios with minimal forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T04:22:15Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• Do Language Models Exhibit the Same Cognitive Biases in Problem Solving as Human Learners? [140.9751389452011]
  We study the biases of large language models (LLMs) in relation to those known in children when solving arithmetic word problems. We generate a novel set of word problems for each of these tests, using a neuro-symbolic approach that enables fine-grained control over the problem features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T18:48:20Z)
• Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration [83.4031923134958]
  Corex is a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform Large Language Models into autonomous agents. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes. We demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T07:11:39Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.