PersoBench: Benchmarking Personalized Response Generation in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03198v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 07:29:41 GMT
• Title: PersoBench: Benchmarking Personalized Response Generation in Large Language Models
• Authors: Saleh Afzoon, Usman Naseem, Amin Beheshti, Zahra Jamali,
• Abstract summary: We present a new benchmark, PersoBench, to evaluate the personalization ability of large language models (LLMs) in persona-aware dialogue generation. Our analysis, conducted on three well-known persona-aware datasets, evaluates multiple dimensions of response quality, including fluency, diversity, coherence, and personalization.
• Score: 6.8046587254152735
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive conversational capabilities, their proficiency in delivering personalized responses remains unclear. Although recent benchmarks automatically evaluate persona consistency in role-playing contexts using LLM-based judgment, the evaluation of personalization in response generation remains underexplored. To address this gap, we present a new benchmark, PersoBench, to evaluate the personalization ability of LLMs in persona-aware dialogue generation within a zero-shot setting. We assess the performance of three open-source and three closed-source LLMs using well-known datasets and a range of metrics. Our analysis, conducted on three well-known persona-aware datasets, evaluates multiple dimensions of response quality, including fluency, diversity, coherence, and personalization, across both standard and chain-of-thought prompting methods. Our findings reveal that while LLMs excel at generating fluent and diverse responses, they are far from satisfactory in delivering personalized and coherent responses considering both the conversation context and the provided personas. Our benchmark implementation is available at https://github.com/salehafzoon/PersoBench.

Related papers

• FB-Bench: A Fine-Grained Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs' Responsiveness to Human Feedback [33.532239489610056]
  FB-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models' responsiveness to human feedback in real-world usage scenarios. We extensively evaluate a broad array of popular LLMs, revealing significant variations in their performance across different interaction scenarios. Our findings underscore both the strengths and limitations of current models, providing valuable insights and directions for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:40:01Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align'' We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures. For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)
• Reference-Guided Verdict: LLMs-as-Judges in Automatic Evaluation of Free-Form Text [12.879551933541345]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating human-like conversations. Conventional metrics like BLEU and ROUGE are inadequate for capturing the subtle semantics and contextual richness of such generative outputs. We propose a reference-guided verdict method that automates the evaluation process by leveraging multiple LLMs-as-judges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T16:01:45Z)
• PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment [46.750587209286344]
  We introduce PERSONA, a test bed designed to evaluate and improve pluralistic alignment of language models. We procedurally generate diverse user profiles from US census data, resulting in 1,586 synthetic personas. We then generate a large-scale evaluation dataset containing 3,868 prompts and 317,200 feedback pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:11:39Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• PROXYQA: An Alternative Framework for Evaluating Long-Form Text Generation with Large Language Models [72.57329554067195]
  ProxyQA is an innovative framework dedicated to assessing longtext generation. It comprises in-depth human-curated meta-questions spanning various domains, each accompanied by specific proxy-questions with pre-annotated answers. It assesses the generated content's quality through the evaluator's accuracy in addressing the proxy-questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T18:12:25Z)
• A Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of Large Language Models as Automatic Dialogue Evaluators [46.939611070781794]
  Large language models (LLMs) are shown to be promising substitutes for human judges. We analyze the multi-dimensional evaluation capability of 30 recently emerged LLMs at both turn and dialogue levels. We also probe the robustness of the LLMs in handling various adversarial perturbations at both turn and dialogue levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T04:50:57Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• Large Language Models as Automated Aligners for benchmarking Vision-Language Models [48.4367174400306]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have reached a new level of sophistication, showing notable competence in executing intricate cognition and reasoning tasks. Existing evaluation benchmarks, primarily relying on rigid, hand-crafted datasets, face significant limitations in assessing the alignment of these increasingly anthropomorphic models with human intelligence. In this work, we address the limitations via Auto-Bench, which delves into exploring LLMs as proficient curation, measuring the alignment betweenVLMs and human intelligence and value through automatic data curation and assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T16:12:05Z)
• MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback [78.60644407028022]
  We introduce MINT, a benchmark that evaluates large language models' ability to solve tasks with multi-turn interactions. LLMs generally benefit from tools and language feedback, with performance gains of 1-8% for each turn of tool use. LLMs evaluated, supervised instruction-finetuning (SIFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) generally hurt multi-turn capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T15:25:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.