ProverbEval: Exploring LLM Evaluation Challenges for Low-resource Language Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05049v3
• Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:08:04 GMT
• Title: ProverbEval: Exploring LLM Evaluation Challenges for Low-resource Language Understanding
• Authors: Israel Abebe Azime, Atnafu Lambebo Tonja, Tadesse Destaw Belay, Yonas Chanie, Bontu Fufa Balcha, Negasi Haile Abadi, Henok Biadglign Ademtew, Mulubrhan Abebe Nerea, Debela Desalegn Yadeta, Derartu Dagne Geremew, Assefa Atsbiha tesfau, Philipp Slusallek, Thamar Solorio, Dietrich Klakow,
• Abstract summary: We introduce proverbeval, LLM evaluation benchmark for low-resource languages. Native language proverb descriptions significantly improve tasks such as proverb generation. monolingual evaluations consistently outperformed their cross-lingual counterparts in generation tasks.
• Score: 15.93642619347214
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid development of evaluation datasets to assess LLMs understanding across a wide range of subjects and domains, identifying a suitable language understanding benchmark has become increasingly challenging. In this work, we explore LLM evaluation challenges for low-resource language understanding and introduce \proverbeval, LLM evaluation benchmark for low-resource languages, focusing on low-resource language understanding in culture-specific scenarios. We benchmark various LLMs and explore factors that create variability in the benchmarking process. We observed performance variances of up to 50\%, depending on the order in which answer choices were presented in multiple-choice tasks. Native language proverb descriptions significantly improve tasks such as proverb generation, contributing to improved outcomes. Additionally, monolingual evaluations consistently outperformed their cross-lingual counterparts in generation tasks. We argue that special attention must be given to the order of choices, the choice of prompt language, task variability, and generation tasks when creating LLM evaluation benchmarks. Evaluation data available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/israel/ProverbEval, evaluation code https://github.com/EthioNLP/EthioProverbEval.

Related papers

• When LLMs Struggle: Reference-less Translation Evaluation for Low-resource Languages [9.138590152838754]
  Segment-level quality estimation (QE) is a challenging cross-lingual language understanding task. We comprehensively evaluate large language models (LLMs) in zero/few-shot scenarios. Our results indicate that prompt-based approaches are outperformed by the encoder-based fine-tuned QE models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T12:54:05Z)
• Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization [108.6908427615402]
  Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) aims to generate a summary for the source text in a different target language. Currently, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) excel at various English tasks. Recent studies have shown that LLMs' performance on CLS tasks remains unsatisfactory even with few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T00:39:44Z)
• MM-Eval: A Multilingual Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-as-a-Judge and Reward Models [3.961168847961322]
  Large language models (LLMs) are commonly used as evaluators in tasks, where they act as proxies for human preferences or judgments. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on English, offering limited insight into LLMs' effectiveness as evaluators in non-English contexts. We introduce MM-Eval, a multilingual meta-evaluation benchmark that covers 18 languages across six categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T06:04:55Z)
• What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation? [12.42394213466485]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve results comparable to fine-tuned multilingual pre-trained language models. This paper explores what translation information, such as the source, reference, translation errors and annotation guidelines, is needed for LLMs to evaluate machine translation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T09:50:45Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts. We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion. We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• DnA-Eval: Enhancing Large Language Model Evaluation through Decomposition and Aggregation [75.81096662788254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are scalable and economical evaluators. The question of how reliable these evaluators are has emerged as a crucial research question. We propose Decompose and Aggregate, which breaks down the evaluation process into different stages based on pedagogical practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:12:30Z)
• Language Ranker: A Metric for Quantifying LLM Performance Across High and Low-Resource Languages [48.40607157158246]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z)
• METAL: Towards Multilingual Meta-Evaluation [12.852595634767901]
  This study proposes a framework for an end-to-end assessment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as evaluators in multilingual scenarios. We create a dataset covering 10 languages containing native speaker judgments for the task of summarization. We compare the performance of LLM-based evaluators created using GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, and PaLM2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:14:54Z)
• OMGEval: An Open Multilingual Generative Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.54423478596468]
  We introduce OMGEval, the first Open-source Multilingual Generative test set that can assess the capability of LLMs in different languages. For each language, OMGEval provides 804 open-ended questions, covering a wide range of important capabilities of LLMs. Specifically, the current version of OMGEval includes 5 languages (i.e., Zh, Ru, Fr, Es, Ar)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:42:41Z)
• Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization [132.25202059478065]
  We benchmark large language models (LLMs) on instruction controllable text summarization. Our study reveals that instruction controllable text summarization remains a challenging task for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T18:25:26Z)
• CARE-MI: Chinese Benchmark for Misinformation Evaluation in Maternity and Infant Care [14.326936563564171]
  We present a benchmark, CARE-MI, for evaluating misinformation in large language models (LLMs) Our proposed benchmark fills the gap between the extensive usage of LLMs and the lack of datasets for assessing the misinformation generated by these models. Using our benchmark, we conduct extensive experiments and found that current Chinese LLMs are far from perfect in the topic of maternity and infant care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T03:34:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.