Why Fine-Tuning Struggles with Forgetting in Machine Unlearning? Theoretical Insights and a Remedial Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03833v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:01:52 GMT
• Title: Why Fine-Tuning Struggles with Forgetting in Machine Unlearning? Theoretical Insights and a Remedial Approach
• Authors: Meng Ding, Jinhui Xu, Kaiyi Ji,
• Abstract summary: Fine-tuning (FT) methods have become one of the fundamental approaches for approximating unlearning. We present the first theoretical analysis of FT methods for machine unlearning within a linear regression framework. We propose a theoretical approach to mitigate the retention of forgetting data in the pretrained model.
• Score: 19.307968983872588
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine Unlearning has emerged as a significant area of research, focusing on 'removing' specific subsets of data from a trained model. Fine-tuning (FT) methods have become one of the fundamental approaches for approximating unlearning, as they effectively retain model performance. However, it is consistently observed that naive FT methods struggle to forget the targeted data. In this paper, we present the first theoretical analysis of FT methods for machine unlearning within a linear regression framework, providing a deeper exploration of this phenomenon. We investigate two scenarios with distinct features and overlapping features. Our findings reveal that FT models can achieve zero remaining loss yet fail to forget the forgetting data, unlike golden models (trained from scratch without the forgetting data). This analysis reveals that naive FT methods struggle with forgetting because the pretrained model retains information about the forgetting data, and the fine-tuning process has no impact on this retained information. To address this issue, we first propose a theoretical approach to mitigate the retention of forgetting data in the pretrained model. Our analysis shows that removing the forgetting data's influence allows FT models to match the performance of the golden model. Building on this insight, we introduce a discriminative regularization term to practically reduce the unlearning loss gap between the fine-tuned model and the golden model. Our experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate these theoretical insights and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed regularization method.

Related papers

• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment [65.15914284008973]
  We propose to leverage an Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) technique to simultaneously build an reward model and a policy model. We show that the proposed algorithms converge to the stationary solutions of the IRL problem. Our results indicate that it is beneficial to leverage reward learning throughout the entire alignment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:11:05Z)
• The Edge-of-Reach Problem in Offline Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [37.387280102209274]
  offline reinforcement learning aims to enable agents to be trained from pre-collected datasets, however, this comes with the added challenge of estimating the value of behavior not covered in the dataset. Model-based methods offer a solution by allowing agents to collect additional synthetic data via rollouts in a learned dynamics model. However, if the learned dynamics model is replaced by the true error-free dynamics, existing model-based methods completely fail. We propose Reach-Aware Value Learning (RAVL), a simple and robust method that directly addresses the edge-of-reach problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T20:38:00Z)
• An Information Theoretic Approach to Machine Unlearning [45.600917449314444]
  Key challenge in unlearning is forgetting the necessary data in a timely manner, while preserving model performance. In this work, we address the zero-shot unlearning scenario, whereby an unlearning algorithm must be able to remove data given only a trained model and the data to be forgotten. We derive a simple but principled zero-shot unlearning method based on the geometry of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:33:30Z)
• Federated Learning with Projected Trajectory Regularization [65.6266768678291]
  Federated learning enables joint training of machine learning models from distributed clients without sharing their local data. One key challenge in federated learning is to handle non-identically distributed data across the clients. We propose a novel federated learning framework with projected trajectory regularization (FedPTR) for tackling the data issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T02:12:08Z)
• Machine Unlearning Methodology base on Stochastic Teacher Network [33.763901254862766]
  "Right to be forgotten" grants data owners the right to actively withdraw data that has been used for model training. Existing machine unlearning methods have been found to be ineffective in quickly removing knowledge from deep learning models. This paper proposes using a network as a teacher to expedite the mitigation of the influence caused by forgotten data on the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T06:05:23Z)
• Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels [72.81914952849334]
  We propose first scenarios for unlearning and labels in machine learning models. Our approach builds on the concept of influence functions and realizes unlearning through closed-form updates of model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T04:42:24Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Variational Bayesian Unlearning [54.26984662139516]
  We study the problem of approximately unlearning a Bayesian model from a small subset of the training data to be erased. We show that it is equivalent to minimizing an evidence upper bound which trades off between fully unlearning from erased data vs. not entirely forgetting the posterior belief. In model training with VI, only an approximate (instead of exact) posterior belief given the full data can be obtained, which makes unlearning even more challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T11:53:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.