Is What You Ask For What You Get? Investigating Concept Associations in Text-to-Image Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04634v1
• Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 21:42:53 GMT
• Title: Is What You Ask For What You Get? Investigating Concept Associations in Text-to-Image Models
• Authors: Salma Abdel Magid, Weiwei Pan, Simon Warchol, Grace Guo, Junsik Kim, Mahia Rahman, Hanspeter Pfister,
• Abstract summary: characterization allows us to use our framework to audit models and prompt-datasets. We implement Concept2Concept as an open-source interactive visualization tool facilitating use by non-technical end-users.
• Score: 24.851041038347784
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Text-to-image (T2I) models are increasingly used in impactful real-life applications. As such, there is a growing need to audit these models to ensure that they generate desirable, task-appropriate images. However, systematically inspecting the associations between prompts and generated content in a human-understandable way remains challenging. To address this, we propose \emph{Concept2Concept}, a framework where we characterize conditional distributions of vision language models using interpretable concepts and metrics that can be defined in terms of these concepts. This characterization allows us to use our framework to audit models and prompt-datasets. To demonstrate, we investigate several case studies of conditional distributions of prompts, such as user defined distributions or empirical, real world distributions. Lastly, we implement Concept2Concept as an open-source interactive visualization tool facilitating use by non-technical end-users. Warning: This paper contains discussions of harmful content, including CSAM and NSFW material, which may be disturbing to some readers.

Related papers

• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [49.60774626839712]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their fairness, reliability, and potential for misuse. We propose an evaluation framework designed to assess model reliability through their responses to perturbations in the embedding space. Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and retrieval of bias provenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• LLM-based Hierarchical Concept Decomposition for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Classification [5.8754760054410955]
  We introduce textttHi-CoDecomposition, a novel framework designed to enhance model interpretability through structured concept analysis. Our approach not only aligns with the performance of state-of-the-art models but also advances transparency by providing clear insights into the decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T00:36:56Z)
• Concept Arithmetics for Circumventing Concept Inhibition in Diffusion Models [58.065255696601604]
  We use compositional property of diffusion models, which allows to leverage multiple prompts in a single image generation. We argue that it is essential to consider all possible approaches to image generation with diffusion models that can be employed by an adversary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T16:35:16Z)
• Visual Concept-driven Image Generation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Model [65.96212844602866]
  Text-to-image (TTI) models have demonstrated impressive results in generating high-resolution images of complex scenes. Recent approaches have extended these methods with personalization techniques that allow them to integrate user-illustrated concepts. However, the ability to generate images with multiple interacting concepts, such as human subjects, as well as concepts that may be entangled in one, or across multiple, image illustrations remains illusive. We propose a concept-driven TTI personalization framework that addresses these core challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T07:28:37Z)
• Implicit Concept Removal of Diffusion Models [92.55152501707995]
  Text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models often inadvertently generate unwanted concepts such as watermarks and unsafe images. We present the Geom-Erasing, a novel concept removal method based on the geometric-driven control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:13:10Z)
• Create Your World: Lifelong Text-to-Image Diffusion [75.14353789007902]
  We propose Lifelong text-to-image Diffusion Model (L2DM) to overcome knowledge "catastrophic forgetting" for the past encountered concepts. In respect of knowledge "catastrophic forgetting", our L2DM framework devises a task-aware memory enhancement module and a elastic-concept distillation module. Our model can generate more faithful image across a range of continual text prompts in terms of both qualitative and quantitative metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T16:45:56Z)
• FLIRT: Feedback Loop In-context Red Teaming [79.63896510559357]
  We propose an automatic red teaming framework that evaluates a given black-box model and exposes its vulnerabilities. Our framework uses in-context learning in a feedback loop to red team models and trigger them into unsafe content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T14:03:08Z)
• Discovering Concepts in Learned Representations using Statistical Inference and Interactive Visualization [0.76146285961466]
  Concept discovery is important for bridging the gap between non-deep learning experts and model end-users. Current approaches include hand-crafting concept datasets and then converting them to latent space directions. In this study, we offer another two approaches to guide user discovery of meaningful concepts, one based on multiple hypothesis testing, and another on interactive visualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T22:29:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.