The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04699v1
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 02:30:18 GMT
- Title: The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead?
- Authors: Alexander S. Choi, Syeda Sabrina Akter, JP Singh, Antonios Anastasopoulos,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks.
This paper investigates the efficiency and accuracy of LLMs in specialized tasks through a structured user study focusing on Human-LLM partnership.
- Score: 60.01746782465275
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks, leading researchers to use them for time and labor-intensive analyses. However, their capability to handle highly specialized and open-ended tasks in domains like policy studies remains in question. This paper investigates the efficiency and accuracy of LLMs in specialized tasks through a structured user study focusing on Human-LLM partnership. The study, conducted in two stages-Topic Discovery and Topic Assignment-integrates LLMs with expert annotators to observe the impact of LLM suggestions on what is usually human-only analysis. Results indicate that LLM-generated topic lists have significant overlap with human generated topic lists, with minor hiccups in missing document-specific topics. However, LLM suggestions may significantly improve task completion speed, but at the same time introduce anchoring bias, potentially affecting the depth and nuance of the analysis, raising a critical question about the trade-off between increased efficiency and the risk of biased analysis.
Related papers
- Position: Scaling LLM Agents Requires Asymptotic Analysis with LLM Primitives [8.713076928533846]
Decomposing hard problems into subproblems often makes them easier and more efficient to solve.
This paper argues that analysis with LLM primitives is needed to reason about the efficiency of such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T20:47:43Z) - Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Data [0.631976908971572]
This research investigates the effectiveness of LLM-as-judge models to evaluate the thematic alignment of summaries generated by other LLMs.
Our findings reveal that while LLM-as-judge offer a scalable solution comparable to human raters, humans may still excel at detecting subtle, context-specific nuances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-14T14:49:14Z) - Aggregation Artifacts in Subjective Tasks Collapse Large Language Models' Posteriors [74.04775677110179]
In-context Learning (ICL) has become the primary method for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs)
In this work, we examine whether this is the result of the aggregation used in corresponding datasets, where trying to combine low-agreement, disparate annotations might lead to annotation artifacts that create detrimental noise in the prompt.
Our results indicate that aggregation is a confounding factor in the modeling of subjective tasks, and advocate focusing on modeling individuals instead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T17:16:00Z) - Understanding the Human-LLM Dynamic: A Literature Survey of LLM Use in Programming Tasks [0.850206009406913]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming programming practices, offering significant capabilities for code generation activities.
This paper focuses on their use in programming tasks, drawing insights from user studies that assess the impact of LLMs on programming tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T19:34:46Z) - LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing [106.45895712717612]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks.
This study focuses on the topic of LLMs assist NLP Researchers.
To our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such a comprehensive analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T01:30:22Z) - The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM)
We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions.
Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z) - LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging Large Language Model for Thematic Analysis [18.775126929754833]
Thematic analysis (TA) has been widely used for analyzing qualitative data in many disciplines and fields.
Human coders develop and deepen their data interpretation and coding over multiple iterations, making TA labor-intensive and time-consuming.
We propose a human-LLM collaboration framework (i.e., LLM-in-the-loop) to conduct TA with in-context learning (ICL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T17:05:59Z) - Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation [109.8527403904657]
We show that large language models (LLMs) possess unwavering confidence in their knowledge and cannot handle the conflict between internal and external knowledge well.
Retrieval augmentation proves to be an effective approach in enhancing LLMs' awareness of knowledge boundaries.
We propose a simple method to dynamically utilize supporting documents with our judgement strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T16:46:10Z) - Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks.
We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.