Detecting Bias and Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models for Healthcare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06566v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:00:05 GMT
• Title: Detecting Bias and Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Large Language Models for Healthcare
• Authors: Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Zahra Shakeri,
• Abstract summary: Biased AI-generated medical advice and misdiagnoses can jeopardize patient safety. This study introduces new resources designed to promote ethical and precise AI in healthcare.
• Score: 0.2302001830524133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Biased AI-generated medical advice and misdiagnoses can jeopardize patient safety, making the integrity of AI in healthcare more critical than ever. As Large Language Models (LLMs) take on a growing role in medical decision-making, addressing their biases and enhancing their accuracy is key to delivering safe, reliable care. This study addresses these challenges head-on by introducing new resources designed to promote ethical and precise AI in healthcare. We present two datasets: BiasMD, featuring 6,007 question-answer pairs crafted to evaluate and mitigate biases in health-related LLM outputs, and DiseaseMatcher, with 32,000 clinical question-answer pairs spanning 700 diseases, aimed at assessing symptom-based diagnostic accuracy. Using these datasets, we developed the EthiClinician, a fine-tuned model built on the ChatDoctor framework, which outperforms GPT-4 in both ethical reasoning and clinical judgment. By exposing and correcting hidden biases in existing models for healthcare, our work sets a new benchmark for safer, more reliable patient outcomes.

Related papers

• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• An Explainable Hybrid AI Framework for Enhanced Tuberculosis and Symptom Detection [55.35661671061754]
  Tuberculosis remains a critical global health issue, particularly in resource-limited and remote areas.<n>We propose a framework which enhances disease and symptom detection on chest X-rays by integrating two supervised heads and a self-supervised head.<n>Our model achieves an accuracy of 98.85% for distinguishing between COVID-19, tuberculosis, and normal cases, and a macro-F1 score of 90.09% for multilabel symptom detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T17:18:55Z)
• EchoBench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Medical Large Vision-Language Models [82.43729208063468]
  Recent benchmarks for medical Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) emphasize leaderboard accuracy, overlooking reliability and safety.<n>We study sycophancy -- models' tendency to uncritically echo user-provided information.<n>We introduce EchoBench, a benchmark to systematically evaluate sycophancy in medical LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T14:09:55Z)
• How to Evaluate Medical AI [4.23552814358972]
  We introduce Relative Precision and Recall of Algorithmic Diagnostics (RPAD and RRAD)<n>RPAD and RRAD compare AI outputs against multiple expert opinions rather than a single reference.<n>Large-scale study shows that top-performing models, such as DeepSeek-V3, achieve consistency on par with or exceeding expert consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T14:01:22Z)
• Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [57.73472878679636]
  We introduce Med-RewardBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate medical reward models and judges.<n>Med-RewardBench features a multimodal dataset spanning 13 organ systems and 8 clinical departments, with 1,026 expert-annotated cases.<n>A rigorous three-step process ensures high-quality evaluation data across six clinically critical dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T08:58:39Z)
• Beyond Benchmarks: Dynamic, Automatic And Systematic Red-Teaming Agents For Trustworthy Medical Language Models [87.66870367661342]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used in AI applications in healthcare.<n>Red-teaming framework that continuously stress-test LLMs can reveal significant weaknesses in four safety-critical domains.<n>A suite of adversarial agents is applied to autonomously mutate test cases, identify/evolve unsafe-triggering strategies, and evaluate responses.<n>Our framework delivers an evolvable, scalable, and reliable safeguard for the next generation of medical AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:44:22Z)
• Multi-Modal Explainable Medical AI Assistant for Trustworthy Human-AI Collaboration [17.11245701879749]
  Generalist Medical AI (GMAI) systems have demonstrated expert-level performance in biomedical perception tasks.<n>Here, we present XMedGPT, a clinician-centric, multi-modal AI assistant that integrates textual and visual interpretability.<n>We validate XMedGPT across four pillars: multi-modal interpretability, uncertainty quantification, and prognostic modeling, and rigorous benchmarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-11T08:32:01Z)
• Machine Learning Solutions Integrated in an IoT Healthcare Platform for Heart Failure Risk Stratification [0.16863755729554883]
  The management of chronic Heart Failure (HF) presents significant challenges in modern healthcare.<n>We present a predictive model founded on Machine Learning (ML) techniques to identify patients at HF risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T14:07:05Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• Uncertainty-aware abstention in medical diagnosis based on medical texts [87.88110503208016]
  This study addresses the critical issue of reliability for AI-assisted medical diagnosis. We focus on the selection prediction approach that allows the diagnosis system to abstain from providing the decision if it is not confident in the diagnosis. We introduce HUQ-2, a new state-of-the-art method for enhancing reliability in selective prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T10:15:21Z)
• A Scalable Approach to Benchmarking the In-Conversation Differential Diagnostic Accuracy of a Health AI [0.0]
  This study introduces a scalable benchmarking methodology for assessing health AI systems. Our methodology employs 400 validated clinical vignettes across 14 medical specialties, using AI-powered patient actors to simulate realistic clinical interactions. August achieved a top-one diagnostic accuracy of 81.8% (327/400 cases) and a top-two accuracy of 85.0% (340/400 cases), significantly outperforming traditional symptom checkers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T05:02:33Z)
• Which Client is Reliable?: A Reliable and Personalized Prompt-based Federated Learning for Medical Image Question Answering [51.26412822853409]
  We present a novel personalized federated learning (pFL) method for medical visual question answering (VQA) models. Our method introduces learnable prompts into a Transformer architecture to efficiently train it on diverse medical datasets without massive computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:31:17Z)
• AIPatient: Simulating Patients with EHRs and LLM Powered Agentic Workflow [33.8495939261319]
  We develop an advanced simulated patient system with AIPatient Knowledge Graph (AIPatient KG) as the input and Reasoning Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Reasoning RAG) as the generation backbone. Reasoning RAG leverages six LLM powered agents spanning tasks including retrieval, KG query generation, abstraction, checker, rewrite, and summarization. Our system also presents high readability (median Flesch Reading Ease 77.23; median Flesch Kincaid Grade 5.6), robustness (ANOVA F-value 0.6126, p>0.1), and stability (ANOVA F-value 0.782, p>0.1)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T17:17:15Z)
• From Uncertainty to Trust: Kernel Dropout for AI-Powered Medical Predictions [14.672477787408887]
  AI-driven medical predictions with trustworthy confidence are essential for ensuring the responsible use of AI in healthcare applications. This paper proposes a novel approach to address these challenges, introducing a Bayesian Monte Carlo Dropout model with kernel modelling. We demonstrate significant improvements in reliability, even with limited data, offering a promising step towards building trust in AI-driven medical predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T11:43:26Z)
• A Concept-based Interpretable Model for the Diagnosis of Choroid Neoplasias using Multimodal Data [28.632437578685842]
  We focus on choroid neoplasias, the most prevalent form of eye cancer in adults, albeit rare with 5.1 per million. Our work introduces a concept-based interpretable model that distinguishes between three types of choroidal tumors, integrating insights from domain experts via radiological reports. Remarkably, this model achieves an F1 score of 0.91, rivaling that of black-box models, but also boosts the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors by 42%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T07:15:53Z)
• Integrating ChatGPT into Secure Hospital Networks: A Case Study on Improving Radiology Report Analysis [1.3624495460189863]
  This study demonstrates the first in-hospital adaptation of a cloud-based AI, similar to ChatGPT, into a secure model for analyzing radiology reports. By employing a unique sentence-level knowledge distillation method through contrastive learning, we achieve over 95% accuracy in detecting anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:02:24Z)
• Large Language Models in Medical Term Classification and Unexpected Misalignment Between Response and Reasoning [28.355000184014084]
  This study assesses the ability of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) to identify patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from discharge summaries. The data was partitioned into training, validation, and testing sets in a 7:2:1 ratio for model fine-tuning and evaluation. Open-source models like Falcon and LLaMA 2 achieved high accuracy but lacked explanatory reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T17:36:48Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Advancing COVID-19 Diagnosis with Privacy-Preserving Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence [79.038671794961]
  We launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the AI model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution. Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans (CTs) from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the UK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T00:43:41Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.