TVBench: Redesigning Video-Language Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07752v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:28:36 GMT
• Title: TVBench: Redesigning Video-Language Evaluation
• Authors: Daniel Cores, Michael Dorkenwald, Manuel Mucientes, Cees G. M. Snoek, Yuki M. Asano,
• Abstract summary: We show that the currently most used video-language benchmarks can be solved without requiring much temporal reasoning. We propose TVBench, a novel open-source video multiple-choice question-answering benchmark.
• Score: 48.71203934876828
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have demonstrated impressive performance when integrated with vision models even enabling video understanding. However, evaluating these video models presents its own unique challenges, for which several benchmarks have been proposed. In this paper, we show that the currently most used video-language benchmarks can be solved without requiring much temporal reasoning. We identified three main issues in existing datasets: (i) static information from single frames is often sufficient to solve the tasks (ii) the text of the questions and candidate answers is overly informative, allowing models to answer correctly without relying on any visual input (iii) world knowledge alone can answer many of the questions, making the benchmarks a test of knowledge replication rather than visual reasoning. In addition, we found that open-ended question-answering benchmarks for video understanding suffer from similar issues while the automatic evaluation process with LLMs is unreliable, making it an unsuitable alternative. As a solution, we propose TVBench, a novel open-source video multiple-choice question-answering benchmark, and demonstrate through extensive evaluations that it requires a high level of temporal understanding. Surprisingly, we find that most recent state-of-the-art video-language models perform similarly to random performance on TVBench, with only Gemini-Pro and Tarsier clearly surpassing this baseline.

Related papers

• MINERVA: Evaluating Complex Video Reasoning [72.12644008002566]
  We provide a new video reasoning dataset called MINERVA for modern multimodal models. Our dataset is multimodal, diverse in terms of video domain and length, and consists of complex multi-step questions. We perform fine-grained error analysis to identify common failure modes across various models, and create a taxonomy of reasoning errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T17:41:49Z)
• CG-Bench: Clue-grounded Question Answering Benchmark for Long Video Understanding [43.858197893052115]
  CG-Bench is a novel benchmark for clue-grounded question answering in long videos. It features 1,219 manually curated videos categorized by a granular system with 14 primary categories, 171 secondary categories, and 638 tertiary categories. The benchmark includes 12,129 QA pairs in three major question types: perception, reasoning, and hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T18:46:45Z)
• TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Models [75.42002690128486]
  TemporalBench is a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating fine-grained temporal understanding in videos. It consists of 10K video question-answer pairs, derived from 2K high-quality human annotations detailing the temporal dynamics in video clips. Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4o achieve only 38.5% question answering accuracy on TemporalBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:59:58Z)
• LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding [41.9477837230283]
  LongVideoBench is a question-answering benchmark that features video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long. Our benchmark includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with their subtitles across diverse themes. We formulate a novel video question-answering task termed referring reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T16:00:55Z)
• MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding [67.56182262082729]
  We introduce MMBench-Video, a quantitative benchmark to rigorously evaluate large vision-language models (LVLMs) in video understanding. MMBench-Video incorporates lengthy videos from YouTube and employs free-form questions, mirroring practical use cases. The benchmark is meticulously crafted to probe the models' temporal reasoning skills, with all questions human-annotated according to a carefully constructed ability taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:26:01Z)
• Needle In A Video Haystack: A Scalable Synthetic Evaluator for Video MLLMs [20.168429351519055]
  Video understanding is a crucial next step for multimodal large language models (LMLMs) We propose VideoNIAH (Video Needle In A Haystack), a benchmark construction framework through synthetic video generation. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of both proprietary and open-source models, uncovering significant differences in their video understanding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:50:05Z)
• CinePile: A Long Video Question Answering Dataset and Benchmark [55.30860239555001]
  We present a novel dataset and benchmark, CinePile, specifically designed for authentic long-form video understanding. Our comprehensive dataset comprises 305,000 multiple-choice questions (MCQs), covering various visual and multimodal aspects. We fine-tuned open-source Video-LLMs on the training split and evaluated both open-source and proprietary video-centric LLMs on the test split of our dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T17:59:02Z)
• Grounded Question-Answering in Long Egocentric Videos [39.281013854331285]
  open-ended question-answering (QA) in long, egocentric videos allows individuals or robots to inquire about their own past visual experiences. This task presents unique challenges, including the complexity of temporally grounding queries within extensive video content. Our proposed approach tackles these challenges by (i) integrating query grounding and answering within a unified model to reduce error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T16:31:55Z)
• MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark [63.14000659130736]
  We introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench. We first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T17:59:04Z)
• Video-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Video-based Large Language Models [81.84810348214113]
  Video-based large language models (Video-LLMs) have been recently introduced, targeting both fundamental improvements in perception and comprehension, and a diverse range of user inquiries. To guide the development of such a model, the establishment of a robust and comprehensive evaluation system becomes crucial. This paper proposes textitVideo-Bench, a new comprehensive benchmark along with a toolkit specifically designed for evaluating Video-LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T18:59:58Z)
• Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models [78.64546291816117]
  We propose a novel multimodal video benchmark to evaluate the perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained multimodal models. The Perception Test focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and types of reasoning (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual) across video, audio, and text modalities. The benchmark probes pre-trained models for their transfer capabilities, in a zero-shot / few-shot or limited finetuning regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T07:54:37Z)
• Fill-in-the-blank as a Challenging Video Understanding Evaluation Framework [19.031957183047048]
  We introduce a novel dataset consisting of 28,000 videos and fill-in-the-blank tests. We show that both a multimodal model and a strong language model have a large gap with human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T04:00:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.