CG-Bench: Clue-grounded Question Answering Benchmark for Long Video Understanding
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12075v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:46:45 GMT
- Title: CG-Bench: Clue-grounded Question Answering Benchmark for Long Video Understanding
- Authors: Guo Chen, Yicheng Liu, Yifei Huang, Yuping He, Baoqi Pei, Jilan Xu, Yali Wang, Tong Lu, Limin Wang,
- Abstract summary: CG-Bench is a novel benchmark for clue-grounded question answering in long videos.
It features 1,219 manually curated videos categorized by a granular system with 14 primary categories, 171 secondary categories, and 638 tertiary categories.
The benchmark includes 12,129 QA pairs in three major question types: perception, reasoning, and hallucination.
- Score: 43.858197893052115
- License:
- Abstract: Most existing video understanding benchmarks for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) focus only on short videos. The limited number of benchmarks for long video understanding often rely solely on multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, because of the inherent limitation of MCQ-based evaluation and the increasing reasoning ability of MLLMs, models can give the current answer purely by combining short video understanding with elimination, without genuinely understanding the video content. To address this gap, we introduce CG-Bench, a novel benchmark designed for clue-grounded question answering in long videos. CG-Bench emphasizes the model's ability to retrieve relevant clues for questions, enhancing evaluation credibility. It features 1,219 manually curated videos categorized by a granular system with 14 primary categories, 171 secondary categories, and 638 tertiary categories, making it the largest benchmark for long video analysis. The benchmark includes 12,129 QA pairs in three major question types: perception, reasoning, and hallucination. Compensating the drawbacks of pure MCQ-based evaluation, we design two novel clue-based evaluation methods: clue-grounded white box and black box evaluations, to assess whether the model generates answers based on the correct understanding of the video. We evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source MLLMs on CG-Bench. Results indicate that current models significantly underperform in understanding long videos compared to short ones, and a significant gap exists between open-source and commercial models. We hope CG-Bench can advance the development of more trustworthy and capable MLLMs for long video understanding. All annotations and video data are released at https://cg-bench.github.io/leaderboard/.
Related papers
- HLV-1K: A Large-scale Hour-Long Video Benchmark for Time-Specific Long Video Understanding [52.696422425058245]
We build a large-scale hour-long long video benchmark, HLV-1K, designed to evaluate long video understanding models.
HLV-1K comprises 1009 hour-long videos with 14,847 high-quality question answering (QA) and multi-choice question asnwering (MCQA)
We evaluate our benchmark using existing state-of-the-art methods and demonstrate its value for testing deep long video understanding capabilities at different levels and for various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-03T05:32:37Z) - TemporalBench: Benchmarking Fine-grained Temporal Understanding for Multimodal Video Models [75.42002690128486]
TemporalBench is a new benchmark dedicated to evaluating fine-grained temporal understanding in videos.
It consists of 10K video question-answer pairs, derived from 2K high-quality human annotations detailing the temporal dynamics in video clips.
Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4o achieve only 38.5% question answering accuracy on TemporalBench.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:59:58Z) - TVBench: Redesigning Video-Language Evaluation [48.71203934876828]
We show that the currently most used video-language benchmarks can be solved without requiring much temporal reasoning.
We propose TVBench, a novel open-source video multiple-choice question-answering benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T09:28:36Z) - LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding [41.9477837230283]
LongVideoBench is a question-answering benchmark that features video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long.
Our benchmark includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with their subtitles across diverse themes.
We formulate a novel video question-answering task termed referring reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T16:00:55Z) - Goldfish: Vision-Language Understanding of Arbitrarily Long Videos [51.547065479762715]
We present a methodology tailored for comprehending videos of arbitrary lengths.
We also introduce the TVQA-long benchmark, designed to evaluate models' capabilities in understanding long videos with questions in both vision and text content.
Our results indicate that our models have significant improvements in both long and short-video understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T15:59:32Z) - MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding [67.56182262082729]
We introduce MMBench-Video, a quantitative benchmark to rigorously evaluate large vision-language models (LVLMs) in video understanding.
MMBench-Video incorporates lengthy videos from YouTube and employs free-form questions, mirroring practical use cases.
The benchmark is meticulously crafted to probe the models' temporal reasoning skills, with all questions human-annotated according to a carefully constructed ability taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T17:26:01Z) - Needle In A Video Haystack: A Scalable Synthetic Evaluator for Video MLLMs [20.168429351519055]
Video understanding is a crucial next step for multimodal large language models (LMLMs)
We propose VideoNIAH (Video Needle In A Haystack), a benchmark construction framework through synthetic video generation.
We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of both proprietary and open-source models, uncovering significant differences in their video understanding capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T17:50:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.