Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08146v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:31:23 GMT
• Title: Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning
• Authors: Amrith Setlur, Chirag Nagpal, Adam Fisch, Xinyang Geng, Jacob Eisenstein, Rishabh Agarwal, Alekh Agarwal, Jonathan Berant, Aviral Kumar,
• Abstract summary: A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs) PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, potentially improving credit assignment over outcome reward models (ORMs) To improve a base policy by running search against a PRM or using it as dense rewards for reinforcement learning (RL), we ask: "How should we design process rewards?" We theoretically characterize the set of good provers and our results show that optimizing process rewards from such provers improves exploration during test-time search and online RL.
• Score: 90.23629291067763
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A promising approach for improving reasoning in large language models is to use process reward models (PRMs). PRMs provide feedback at each step of a multi-step reasoning trace, potentially improving credit assignment over outcome reward models (ORMs) that only provide feedback at the final step. However, collecting dense, per-step human labels is not scalable, and training PRMs from automatically-labeled data has thus far led to limited gains. To improve a base policy by running search against a PRM or using it as dense rewards for reinforcement learning (RL), we ask: "How should we design process rewards?". Our key insight is that, to be effective, the process reward for a step should measure progress: a change in the likelihood of producing a correct response in the future, before and after taking the step, corresponding to the notion of step-level advantages in RL. Crucially, this progress should be measured under a prover policy distinct from the base policy. We theoretically characterize the set of good provers and our results show that optimizing process rewards from such provers improves exploration during test-time search and online RL. In fact, our characterization shows that weak prover policies can substantially improve a stronger base policy, which we also observe empirically. We validate our claims by training process advantage verifiers (PAVs) to predict progress under such provers, and show that compared to ORMs, test-time search against PAVs is $>8\%$ more accurate, and $1.5-5\times$ more compute-efficient. Online RL with dense rewards from PAVs enables one of the first results with $5-6\times$ gain in sample efficiency, and $>6\%$ gain in accuracy, over ORMs.

Related papers

• VinePPO: Unlocking RL Potential For LLM Reasoning Through Refined Credit Assignment [66.80143024475635]
  We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates. We show that VinePPO consistently outperforms PPO and other RL-free baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z)
• ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search [50.45155830888697]
  ReST-MCTS* integrates process reward guidance with tree search MCTS* for collecting higher-quality reasoning traces. We first show that the tree-search policy in ReST-MCTS* achieves higher accuracy compared with prior LLM reasoning baselines. We then show that by using traces searched by this tree-search policy as training data, we can continuously enhance the three language models for multiple iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T07:40:00Z)
• Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Aligned Experience Estimation [37.36913210031282]
  Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) has shown impressive capabilities in training agents without reward engineering. We propose SEER, an efficient PbRL method that integrates label smoothing and policy regularization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:49:20Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
  We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output. We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion. Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z)
• Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning [64.27898739929734]
  Process-Supervised Reward Model (PRM) furnishes LLMs with step-by-step feedback during the training phase. We propose a greedy search algorithm that employs the step-level feedback from PRM to optimize the reasoning pathways explored by LLMs. To explore the versatility of our approach, we develop a novel method to automatically generate step-level reward dataset for coding tasks and observed similar improved performance in the code generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T05:21:50Z)
• Distributional Reward Estimation for Effective Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [19.788336796981685]
  We propose a novel Distributional Reward Estimation framework for effective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (DRE-MARL) Our main idea is to design the multi-action-branch reward estimation and policy-weighted reward aggregation for stabilized training. The superiority of the DRE-MARL is demonstrated using benchmark multi-agent scenarios, compared with the SOTA baselines in terms of both effectiveness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:31:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.